T-ShirtDynasty
Moderator
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2005
- Messages
- 3,541
- Reaction score
- 1
Forgive me for the new thread (mods feel free to over-rule), the other Wilfork thread based on the PFT article kinda degenerated there, and what wasn't mentioned in the PFT piece (surprise) is a mention of the lack of evidence that was brought up on the NFL.com piece:
So if the video upheld New England's contention there was no intent to injure, why is he getting a fine at all?
Oh, and HI Guys! How ya been?
Source: Patriots' Wilfork to be fined, not suspended for hit on CutlerWilfork was summoned before Goodell after the Broncos claimed tape of New England's 41-7 win Oct. 20 showed Wilfork elbowing Cutler in the helmet.
However, the tapes that were reviewed during the hearing did not show that clearly, upholding New England's contention there was no intent to injure. They also showed Wilfork helping up Cutler and patting him on the back after the play.
So if the video upheld New England's contention there was no intent to injure, why is he getting a fine at all?
Oh, and HI Guys! How ya been?