SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I am not surprised BB made both lists.
I am surprised Cauglin made the would not want to have as a coach list.
Yep. The nice thing is that the negative part presumably doesn't hurt the team at all in recruiting FAs, because the Patriots wouldn't want the kind of player who wouldn't like to play for a coach like Belichick.
Yep. The nice thing is that the negative part presumably doesn't hurt the team at all in recruiting FAs, because the Patriots wouldn't want the kind of player who wouldn't like to play for a coach like Belichick.
The naming of Belichick on both lists illustrated how players were willing to make compromises when it comes to winning.
Since it originated in the NY Times, Eric's probably screwed in that department.Very interesting - thanks for sharing....
Seems natural that BB would be on the "most like to play for" and the "least"
He's a demanding Coach. Players don't always like that. But he wins. Players LOVE that!
Meanwhile MangIdiot languishes only on the "Least" like to play for list.
That's not good news if you're ManJudas. He can't win even with a HoF QB and after spending $120 million in the offseason and in a Division without Brady to contend with. He'd better hope no one in the NY area happens to read this article.
OK, so according to the article the players' responses broke down sharply across racial lines, except for agreement on 2 men: Dungy and Belichick. They clearly stand head and shoulders above the rest of the coaching fraternity.
While I am not surprised BB made both lists. I am surprised Cauglin made the would not want to have as a coach list.
I agree with the top four guys on the "Wouldn't like to play for" list.
Coughlin is an old and out-of-touch unreasonable disciplinarian
According to those polls, Lovie Smith should be right there with them, it appears.