Water Boy
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2004
- Messages
- 3,073
- Reaction score
- 1,286
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.based on this game, i would agree...
HOWEVER, i would like u to keep in mind that LoMo ran at the beginnign of the game, agaistn a D which was not tired at all, where areas Jordan ran ONLY in the 4th, against a tired D-line...
It seemed LOMO got at least 2-3 yards minimum per carry.i would prefer seeing Jordan get the start too.
Watching Maroney getting blown back and dance too much is beyond frustrating.
This team has the feel of 2003-4 and Lamont Jordan seems to fit that a hell of a lot better. We need someone who punishes the defense and always falls forward.
It's too early to judge after just one game, but the signs are encouraging. Jordan didn't dance around todayand seemed to have a good burst. He looked like a 2004 Corey Dillon.
Thats especially important when the snow starts falling and the wind gets cold to have him fresh to some extentLamont Jordan is an absolute beast.. Only problem is the guy has a bad back, we need to keep his workload down so we can keep him healthy for when we need him the most. I think this was his problem in Oakland they over used him the first have of the season till he couldnt even perform much in the last half.
We gotta keep this guy healthy he adds a great mix up to our running style
It's the same as always. Lomo dances but sometimes gets the big run. Lamont doesn't dance (a ala Antwoine Smith) and always gets at least three. The O-line seems to never block for Maroney and he gets caught in the backfield.
It seemed LOMO got at least 2-3 yards minimum per carry.
good to see you are back
Thanks, but I would say that it's even better to see the real Seymour back. I thought he was our best D-lineman today and he was good against KC too.