Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > More Pats Forums > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-25-2008, 06:32 PM
PATSNUTme's Avatar
Paranoid Homer Moderator
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Homerville City
Posts: 9,588
PATSNUTme will become famous soon enoughPATSNUTme will become famous soon enough
Default Is a "conversion player" too big a risk at #7???

I been going through a couple of draft guides and the new buzz word this year is "conversion players".

Now,some of the the best players and most often mentioned players for the Patriots are what is termed as "conversion players".

These "conversion players" are players like Ghoslton, Harvey, Long, Merling, and Groves are players that will be drafted to play a different position than they played in college. Drafting a player is always a risk but to draft a "conversion player" may be too big a risk.

Should the Patriots draft a safer pick like Rivers, McKelvin, or Clady who they know can play the position?

Has there ever been a "conversion player" drafted in the top 10 that has really excelled at a new position right away?

Thoughts?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links


  #2  
Old 03-25-2008, 06:40 PM
Mogamedogz's Avatar
VIP Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: RI
Posts: 1,178
Mogamedogz is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via Yahoo to Mogamedogz
Default Re: Is a "conversion player" too big a risk at #7

If Ghoslton is there @ #7 I may just cry tears of joy. Conversion... Smersion.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-25-2008, 08:36 PM
Rookie
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 7
kooooolaidd is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is a "conversion player" too big a risk at #7???

I agree

if Gholston is available there at #7 I will cry tears of joy
the only mock draft that says he'll land to us is Todd MCshay's. Everyone else has him going as early as #1

I think Mcshay's mock was before Gholston's pro day. 42 inch vert!? Unheard of
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-25-2008, 10:08 PM
WhiZa's Avatar
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 1,492
WhiZa is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is a "conversion player" too big a risk at #7???

I was thinking about this today as well. I may be the only person who would not throw their TV out the window if the Pats skip on Gholston. The guy has not played with his hand up at all and he is expected to play OLB? There's no doubt he can rush the passer, and he certainly is athletic enough to play OLB, but there is risk there and the Pats may want to take the safer pick. I can say I would not blame them.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-25-2008, 10:45 PM
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 171
The Great Fork is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is a "conversion player" too big a risk at #7???

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiZa View Post
I was thinking about this today as well. I may be the only person who would not throw their TV out the window if the Pats skip on Gholston. The guy has not played with his hand up at all and he is expected to play OLB? There's no doubt he can rush the passer, and he certainly is athletic enough to play OLB, but there is risk there and the Pats may want to take the safer pick. I can say I would not blame them.
Here's a thought: How many times have you seen the absolute MUST HAVE guy turn out to be a bust? I get upset sometimes when the Pats don't make certain moves but I think you need to trust BB and Pioli to get it done. So as to the "throw their tv out the window" comment, I'm with you. Guys allllways move up after their pro days. Workout warriors do not equal NFL heroes.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-25-2008, 10:51 PM
Moderatrix
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 4,270
patchick will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Is a "conversion player" too big a risk at #7???

I understand the risk of projecting a guy to a new position, but Pats OLB is a position where virtually every player is a conversion...and it's a huge impact position with rare-body-type players. If you want a Ware or Merriman, you have to roll the dice. If somehow Gholston's there, I wouldn't hesitate.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-26-2008, 12:03 AM
BelichickFan's Avatar
Chinese Democracy is Out
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 21,616
BelichickFan will become famous soon enoughBelichickFan will become famous soon enough
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: Is a "conversion player" too big a risk at #7???

I've said several times that a major position change adds too much risk but Merriman, Ware, Wimbley went 11th, 12th, 13th and all had major impacts as rookies. Sure, 7th is a little higher but it's in the same ballpark and you can't argue with the results.
__________________
Don't Give Me a Defensive Player Who Can't Tackle . . . What Am I Going to Do With Him ? --- Bill Belichick
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-26-2008, 12:17 AM
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: quincy
Posts: 683
jeffbiologist can only hope to improve
Default Re: Is a "conversion player" too big a risk at #7???

And what really hurts is that we dont have another pick til 62 so this pick will be mangnified in importance.....and I can see us reaching if we cant trade down. Dont be surprised to see a guy rated 20-25 taken if Long/Gholston arent there. We will likely be taking a risk no matter who we pick at 7.....
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-26-2008, 09:23 AM
dryheat44's Avatar
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,197
dryheat44 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is a "conversion player" too big a risk at #7???

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan View Post
I've said several times that a major position change adds too much risk but Merriman, Ware, Wimbley went 11th, 12th, 13th and all had major impacts as rookies. Sure, 7th is a little higher but it's in the same ballpark and you can't argue with the results.
And I think Gholston's a safer projection to OLB than all of those guys. His explosion and football smarts are just off the charts. I have Oakland grabbing him at 4, though.
__________________
There isn’t too much I need. It doesn’t take much to please me. As long as my wife and kids are healthy with a shelter over their heads and food on the table, I’m happy.
-- Ty Warren, on his plans for celebrating his contract extension.

When it's fourth and 10, you can have the milk drinkers. I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time. -- R.I.P. Max McGee


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by dryheat44; 03-26-2008 at 09:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-26-2008, 09:30 AM
mike100915's Avatar
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Norwood, Ma
Posts: 307
mike100915 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Is a "conversion player" too big a risk at #7???

With his recent pro day success, there is a 0% chance Gholston falls to us at #7. I wouldn't be shocked to see the Patriots move up to say #5 and try to grab him or Chris Long. The draft could easily see Chris Long go #1, and Gholston #2 to the Rams, that's not out of the question. The #7 pick, is looking more and more like one of the toughest picks in the draft. There going to have to choose from Ellis, Rivers, McKelvin, and Clady. What if the Patriots are concerned about Seymour health and recent play and maybe grab a Sedrick Ellis. That is not an impossible thought.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
Like Our Site? Please help support our site by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive added benefits to your account!

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC