George Bush the Whore has Lost his Mind

[mikey]

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/11/wa...ref=washington


.

[QuiGon]

Originally Posted by mikey

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/11/wa...ref=washington


.

Ah, imitation... the sincerest form of flattery...

You better watch out..!! PFinVA and GJAJ don't like this sort of talk, so I am sure they will come down on you just as hard as they came down on me..!! Well, unless they are complete hypocrites that is.... hmmmmmmmm.....

[PressCoverage]

Originally Posted by QuiGon

Ah, imitation... the sincerest form of flattery...

You better watch out..!! PFinVA and GJAJ don't like this sort of talk, so I am sure they will come down on you just as hard as they came down on me..!! Well, unless they are complete hypocrites that is.... hmmmmmmmm.....

this must be more of you being civil and sticking to the facts that pertain to the thread, huh tough guy?

[QuiGon]

Originally Posted by PressCoverage

this must be more of you being civil and sticking to the facts that pertain to the thread, huh tough guy?

Well, I am certainly much more civil than you, wimpy guy.

[PressCoverage]

Originally Posted by QuiGon

Well, I am certainly much more civil than you, wimpy guy.

care to quantify that somehow? or will you be resting your case based merely on what you FEEL again? better still, care to accept the bet?

here, i'll frame it out for you once more:

the first person, you or me, who attacks another poster here in the PoFo on a personal level must agree to leave the forum for a month... i'm willing to play, why not you?

[PatsFanInVa]

Hey, Mikey, has it ever occured to you that the surest way for dumb threads to triumph, is for people who could post smart ones to post dumb ones too?

The "whore" thing is just dumb.

Qui, by the way, get stuffed.

PFnV

[QuiGon]

Originally Posted by PressCoverage

care to quantify that somehow? or will you be resting your case based merely on what you FEEL again? better still, care to accept the bet?

here, i'll frame it out for you once more:

the first person, you or me, who attacks another poster here in the PoFo on a personal level must agree to leave the forum for a month... i'm willing to play, why not you?

Because you're missing one itty bitty important part which I thought would be obvious to even you but apparently not... exactly whom, may I ask, would be the arbiter of such a wager..? You think I am going to leave it up to you to judge what constitutes a "personal attack"...? Or Patters..? Puh-leeze. If you can come up with an acceptable answer to that question, then I will gladly accept your wager.

But be aware that I am not going to accept a completely open ended timeframe on the wager.

[QuiGon]

Originally Posted by PatsFanInVa

Hey, Mikey, has it ever occured to you that the surest way for dumb threads to triumph, is for people who could post smart ones to post dumb ones too?

The "whore" thing is just dumb.

Qui, by the way, get stuffed.

PFnV

Yup... just like I thought... he's a hypocrite...

[PressCoverage]

Originally Posted by QuiGon

Because you're missing one itty bitty important part which I thought would be obvious to even you but apparently not... exactly whom, may I ask, would be the arbiter of such a wager..? You think I am going to leave it up to you to judge what constitutes a "personal attack"...? Or Patters..? Puh-leeze. If you can come up with an acceptable answer to that question, then I will gladly accept your wager.

But be aware that I am not going to accept a completely open ended timeframe on the wager.

personal attacks are rather clear, as stated in the forum rules... though i understand your attempt to fog the issue by pretending you're not quite sure what a personal attack is...

but honestly, why would you not accept an open ended time frame?

[QuiGon]

Originally Posted by PressCoverage

personal attacks are rather clear, as stated in the forum rules... though i understand your attempt to fog the issue by pretending you're not quite sure what a personal attack is...

Well, unfortunately, in this forum there is quite often a disagreement on what does and doesn't constitute a "personal attack". For example, this morning I made a reference to the Armenian Genocide. I was told that that was considered a personal attack when I consider it to be nothing of the sort.

You moonbats (is "moonbat" a personal attack?) have this tendency to take any Conservative idea and call it a personal attack. i.e. if you oppose affirmative action, you're a racist! If you oppose gay marriage, you're a homophobe! Those are all personal attacks!! (etc)...

Originally Posted by PressCoverage

but honestly, why would you not accept an open ended time frame?

Because I am a man of my word and I am not going to commit to something with an open ended time frame until I see how it plays out. However, since we can't agree on the other problem with your bet (who is the arbiter) then I guess discussing timeframes is completely irrelevant.