Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > More Pats Forums > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-19-2007, 08:19 PM
sebman2112's Avatar
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,373
sebman2112 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Pats get pick 91, not 92

The Bengals used their third round pick in the '06 supplemental draft on Ahmad Brooks, which means they loose their '07 third rounder. This will bump everyone who was behind them up one spot.

Find the info here:
http://www.boston.com/sports/footbal.../reiss_pieces/

I really don't know why I forgot about this, since I already knew taking a player in the supplemental means you'll loose that pick in next years draft, and I knew the Bengals took Brooks in the supplemental.....
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links


  #2  
Old 03-19-2007, 08:33 PM
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,840
cstjohn17 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Pats get pick 91, not 92

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebman2112 View Post
The Bengals used their third round pick in the '06 supplemental draft on Ahmad Brooks, which means they loose their '07 third rounder. This will bump everyone who was behind them up one spot.

Find the info here:
http://www.boston.com/sports/footbal.../reiss_pieces/

I really don't know why I forgot about this, since I already knew taking a player in the supplemental means you'll loose that pick in next years draft, and I knew the Bengals took Brooks in the supplemental.....
The Bengals got a good player with that pick, Ahmad Brooks. He has his baggage but I think he will be a very solid pro. Our roster would look good if he was our SILB. If he becomes half the player he was touted to be, a 3rd round pick is a steal.

http://football.about.com/od/playerp...hmadbrooks.htm


Colvin, Wood
Brooks
Bruschi
Thomas, Vrabel

Last edited by cstjohn17; 03-19-2007 at 08:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-19-2007, 08:42 PM
sebman2112's Avatar
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,373
sebman2112 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Pats get pick 91, not 92

Quote:
Originally Posted by cstjohn17 View Post
The Bengals got a good player with that pick, Ahmad Brooks. He has his baggage but I think he will be a very solid pro. Our roster would look good if he was our SILB. If he becomes half the player he was touted to be, a 3rd round pick is a steal.

http://football.about.com/od/playerp...hmadbrooks.htm


Colvin, Wood
Brooks
Bruschi
Thomas, Vrabel
I wanted the Patriots to take him in the sup draft, but everyone thought the Bengals would, and their pick was higher. I didn't think he would get in trouble again so fast, but that probably had more to do with the culture in Cincy, than anything.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by sebman2112; 03-19-2007 at 08:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-19-2007, 10:22 PM
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,840
cstjohn17 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Pats get pick 91, not 92

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebman2112 View Post
I wanted the Patriots to take him in the sup draft, but everyone thought the Bengals would, and their pick was higher. I didn't think he would get in trouble again so fast, but that probably had more to do with the culture in Cincy, than anything.
I think the Pats could have had him if they gave up their 3rd, the supplemental draft was based on the 2005 standings (2006 draft order). The Pats picked at 21 and the Bengals picked at 24).

I don't think he has been in trouble since becoming a pro. He was run out of Virginia in college and had some injuries but was rated higher than AJ Hawk before the 2005 college season.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
Like Our Site? Please help support our site by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive added benefits to your account!

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC