Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Visiting Locker Room
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-08-2006, 05:39 PM
PonyExpress's Avatar
VIP Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ManchVegas!!
Posts: 4,596
PonyExpress will become famous soon enoughPonyExpress will become famous soon enough
Default Interesting Roethlisberger stat

Interesting 2006 stat on Ben.

Games in which he attempted less than 30 passes: 11 TDs/ 1 Int.

Games in which he attempted more than 30 passes: 4 TDs/19 Ints.

Indications of the same trend in 2005:

2005

Less than 30 passes: 14 TDs/ 6 Ints

More than 30 passes: 3 TDs / 3 Ints

I still believe that Ben, when fully healthy, is a top 5 QB. My top 5 right now

Brady, Manning, Palmer, Ben, Brees.

Up and comers:

Rivers, V. Young.

PS. I also think the Steelers did a great job developing Santonio Holmes this year, sticking with him through the fumbles and erratic routes. Too bad C. Jackson didn't develop like that.

Last edited by PonyExpress; 12-08-2006 at 05:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links


  #2  
Old 12-08-2006, 07:22 PM
shirtsleeve's Avatar
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: stuck at work
Posts: 1,685
shirtsleeve is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Interesting Roethlisberger stat

Not a surprise at all when you think about it. Over 30 attempts means the running game is a non-starter and the Squealers are now one dimensional. The load is then on the Hamburgler. And he cant carry the offense himself. He is incapable to deliver the team from a deficit. Therefore, I say he is nowhere near the level of elite QB. Maybe not even average.
__________________
“Here's another startling revelation, on par with those. The sky is blue.” ...Bill Belichick
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-08-2007, 05:34 AM
Rookie
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 29
BumShady911 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Interesting Roethlisberger stat

Quote:
Originally Posted by shirtsleeve View Post
Not a surprise at all when you think about it. Over 30 attempts means the running game is a non-starter and the Squealers are now one dimensional. The load is then on the Hamburgler. And he cant carry the offense himself. He is incapable to deliver the team from a deficit. Therefore, I say he is nowhere near the level of elite QB. Maybe not even average.
but man he has that ring so he has to be a golden boy and a messiah and well he is GOD himself.....like brady is right, because brady has rings too....so it has to be true....oh wait its a team sport and you cant win it all without some breaks and without a team effort.

all rings mean is that the team came to play everytime out in the playoffs that year and they got the breaks plain and simple, want some proof?

last year steelers - Carson's injury...Vandershank's miss, and all the ticky tack calls against Seattle

how about pats in 01 - obviously the tuck rule ruling, adam v making them kicks in the snow and the refs not calling helmet to helmet vs the pats when warner threw that INT that got returned...that helped you did only win by 3 pts you know
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-09-2007, 07:57 PM
Rookie
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18
patsrok93 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Interesting Roethlisberger stat

i really hpoe that u dont consider cheeseburger a top 5 qb
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-09-2007, 09:17 PM
Pats Fanatic's Avatar
VIP Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Skating Away on the Thin Ice of a New Day
Posts: 1,720
Pats Fanatic will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Interesting Roethlisberger stat

Quote:
Originally Posted by BumShady911 View Post
but man he has that ring so he has to be a golden boy and a messiah and well he is GOD himself.....like brady is right, because brady has rings too....so it has to be true....oh wait its a team sport and you cant win it all without some breaks and without a team effort.

all rings mean is that the team came to play everytime out in the playoffs that year and they got the breaks plain and simple, want some proof?

last year steelers - Carson's injury...Vandershank's miss, and all the ticky tack calls against Seattle

how about pats in 01 - obviously the tuck rule ruling, adam v making them kicks in the snow and the refs not calling helmet to helmet vs the pats when warner threw that INT that got returned...that helped you did only win by 3 pts you know
Do you know what you are taking about troll at all. Are you complaining because some team won the Superbowl but your pathetic team didn't. Are you as stupid as you write really because it's pretty sad.

__________________
One can only see what one observes, and one observes only things which are already in the mind -Alphonse Bertillon

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
Like Our Site? Please help support our site by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive added benefits to your account!

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

© Copyright 2008 PatsFans.com - The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of PatsFans.com or our staff.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC