|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The beat goes on, neet another member of the new ethical majority:
http://www.slate.com/id/2154965/ Quote:
Another great choice for Intel Cmte chairman. ![]()
__________________
If the devil can keep you from asking the right questions he never has to worry about the answers. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
They're almost all corrupt, 534 of them for sure - congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) is my one exception. Hopefully the Dems will do good things for America, but eliminating corruption won't be one of them.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know almost nothing about Reyes, but the article from Salon seems unfair. After all, Reyes is a former Border Control official, so it's not surprising that his daughter works in a related field. I don't see how you can prevent people from using the contacts they developed to legitimately help out their kids or how you can prevent kids from helping their employers any more than you can prevent political contributors from getting extra access to politicians. The question is: Were their bribes, inside deals, or other sorts of corruption. Is there a link between IMC's failures and Reyes? I don't know. This, from the Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...42516-2005Apr1 "The investigation focuses in part on IMC's employment of the daughter of Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-Tex.), a former Border Patrol official and key backer of the system of 12,000 sensors and several hundred cameras installed for the Border Patrol between 1998 and last year, officials said. There is no indication that Reyes took part in any impropriety, they said." ... "Officials at the Department of Homeland Security, now the parent of the Border Patrol, acknowledge that there were serious technical and oversight problems with the ISIS program." ... "Rep. Reyes said that he never interceded with U.S. officials to help IMC win a contract and that he helped IMC retain congressional funding because he believes cameras 'are an important part of our ability to defend the borders.'" |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
This guy also wants "More Troops" sent to Iraq
I love this sh!t Auntie Pelosi isn't even warmed up yet, wait until January, no wonder Bush grins when they mention her name, Bush knows whats coming. Pelosi, Obama and Mother Hillary will help elect another Republican president.
__________________
Stupid Harry Boy |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bingo, except that this contract pales to anything Haliburton has gotten or stolen.
__________________
"the trio of Parcells, Drew Bledsoe and Robert Kraft fixed things so that the Patriots became around-the-clock news. And then the duo of Bill Belichick and Tom Brady fixed things so that the Patriots became an around-the-clock obsession." Steve Buckley |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Right, but the concept is the same. The Republicans have their Haliburton and the Democrats have their Bechtel Parsons.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Bill Clinton killed Kathleen Wileys Cat. It is certainly true that during a two year period Halliburton’s revenue from Defense Department contracts doubled. However, that increase in revenue occurred from 1998 to 2000 - during the Clinton administration. If Democrats want to investigate a scandal involving Iraq they should devote their efforts to the UN "Oil-for-Food" program instead of Halliburton. http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...e.asp?ID=15426
__________________
Stupid Harry Boy |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Investigate them both. Haliburton doesn't excuse the sham that is the oil-for-food program, but neither do the UN's crimes excuse Haliburton. And while they're at it, they should investigate Bechtel Parsons for their Big Dig pork. Last edited by Pujo; 12-06-2006 at 11:48 AM. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ron Paul is very highly regarded by virtually all of the intelligent people that I know.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "A theory that explains everything, explains nothing" |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM |
| Like Our Site? Please help support our site by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive added benefits to your account! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|