Top 10 Democrat Sex Scandals

[QuiGon]

I got this from a link from drudgereport... I don't know the original writer but did not want to take credit or make it seem like it was my work... My favorite is number 3, which proves that Democrats will defend homosexual pedophilia to their dying day... so without further ado...

10. Sen. Daniel Inouye. The 82-year-old Hawaii Democrat was accused in the 1990s by numerous women of sexual harassment. Democrats cast doubt on the allegations and the Senate Ethics Committee dropped its investigation.

9. Former Rep. Gus Savage. The Illinois Democrat was accused of fondling a Peace Corps volunteer in 1989 while on a trip to Africa. The House Ethics Committee decided against disciplinary action in 1990.

8. Rep. Barney Frank. The outspoken Massachusetts Democrat hired a male prostitute who ran a prostitution service from Frank’s residence in the 1980s. Only two Democrats in the House of Representatives voted to censure him in 1990.

7. Former Sen. Brock Adams. The late Washington Democrat was forced to stop campaigning after numerous accusations of drugging, assault and rape, the first surfacing in 1988.

6. Former Rep. Fred Richmond. This New York Democrat was arrested in 1978 for soliciting sex from a 16-year-old. He remained in Congress and won re-election—before eventually resigning in 1982 after pleading guilty to tax evasion and drug possession.

5. Former Rep. John Young. The late Texas Democrat increased the salary of a staffer after she gave in to his sexual advances. The congressman won re-election in 1976 but lost two years later.

4. Former Rep. Wayne Hays. The late Ohio Democrat hired an unqualified secretary reportedly for sexual acts. Although he resigned from Congress, the Democratic House leadership stalled in removing him from the Administration Committee in 1976.

3. Former Rep. Gerry Studds. He was censured for sexual relationship with underage male page in 1983. Massachusetts voters returned him to office for six more terms.

2. Former Rep. Mel Reynolds. The Illinois Democrat was convicted of 12 counts of sexual assault with a 16-year-old. President Bill Clinton pardoned him before leaving office.

1. Sen. Teddy Kennedy. The liberal Massachusetts senator testified in defense of nephew accused of rape, invoking his family history to win over the jury in 1991.

[IcyPatriot]

PATSFANS.COM POLITICAL FORUM STYLE.

[DarrylS]

I guess in Qui Con's mind because the Dems did some stuff it is ok for Foley to have done what he did... no one defends anything on your list, but one thing I am certain of is that if Studds did what he did in '06 as he did in '83 he would have faced the same furor as Foley.. Wasn't Foley portrayed as a protector of children?? Isn't his vaunted party the one of family values??

Your response is so typical of the right, lets change the subject and lets divert the blame... have not heard the permissiveness of William Clinton, but it is coming. Already Harry Boy has done his rant and rave about how the Dems knew, but did nothing until it was a month before elections ergo they are responsible. Heard how the Dems like NAMBLA...same old crap over and over again.. Herr Rove has taught his minions well, fortuantely or unfortunately many of us can see through the political rhetoric and understand why. What I worry about if we all spending a lot of time on Foley, what else is going on that we should be paying attention to????

[QuiGon]

Originally Posted by GJAJ15

I guess in Qui Con's mind because the Dems did some stuff it is ok for Foley to have done what he did...

Only a complete moron would deduce that from the things I have said here. But that's OK - I know you're not stupid enough to believe the nonsense you spew.

Originally Posted by GJAJ15

no one defends anything on your list,

WRONG Democrats defended those people on my list for a verrrrrrrrry long time

Originally Posted by GJAJ15

Your response is so typical of the right, lets change the subject and lets divert the blame...

Again, this is the conclusion only a moron could reach - but I know you're just being deliberately obtuse and aren't so stupid as to believe what you're saying.

Like I said before... when a Republican does this sort of thing, Republicans are the first to want to hang him high. When Democrats do this sort of thing, their constituents will defend (and re-elect) them to their dying day.

[Patters]

Originally Posted by QuiGon

Like I said before... when a Republican does this sort of thing, Republicans are the first to want to hang him high. When Democrats do this sort of thing, their constituents will defend (and re-elect) them to their dying day.

I think it depends on the evidence. Foley, the fool, created a full document trail, making it very difficult for him to claim any sort of innocence. If the IMs didn't exist and the public only had the word of a page to go by, I very much doubt Foley and the Republican leadership would be in this much trouble. Also, the Republicans have won votes on issues of morality and accountability. In the best case for the Republicans, the Foley incident proves that the Repugs are just as bad as the Democrats, so if Christian morality is your issue, stay home.

[Harry Boy]

Foley's lawyer is all over Cable News reporting that Foley wants the people to know that he is a "Homosexual" and not a "Pedophile".

How will the "kind and caring" liberal democrats handle the Homosexual side to this?

The democrats have a really good chance of taking over in November and believe it or not I am kind of looking forward to it, it will be fun to sit back and watch these Politically Correct Far Left "Dip Sh!ts" f-ck up the war on terror and everything else in the country.
NAMBLA and Al Queda hope they win also.

[Patters]

Originally Posted by Harry Boy

Al Queda hope they win also.

Why would Al Qaeda want the Democrats to win? They've had all their major successes with the Republicans in power. Think about it: Under the Republicans, they killed 3000 American civilians, 3000 American soldiers, saw their enemy Saddam Hussein defeated, saw their membership ranks swell, saw America alienate a large part of the global community, and have a better chance than ever of having influence in Iraq.

[patsfan13]

Originally Posted by Patters

I think it depends on the evidence. Foley, the fool, created a full document trail, making it very difficult for him to claim any sort of innocence. If the IMs didn't exist and the public only had the word of a page to go by, I very much doubt Foley and the Republican leadership would be in this much trouble. Also, the Republicans have won votes on issues of morality and accountability. In the best case for the Republicans, the Foley incident proves that the Repugs are just as bad as the Democrats, so if Christian morality is your issue, stay home.

So Patters why are the republican leadership in trouble?

I don't recall Tip O'Neill being 'in trouble over the Studds affair?

[Pujo]

You're a loser, Qui Gon, someone said it best: you're the GOP NEM.

Republicans good, Democrats always bad. It's an easy drill to remember. It's easy enough to find huge faults with both, and with just a little selective vision anyone can be a party-line homer.

[Patters]

Originally Posted by patsfan13

So Patters why are the republican leadership in trouble?

I don't recall Tip O'Neill being 'in trouble over the Studds affair?

The Republicans and Democrats worked out a compromise whereby Studds and Crane were both censured for having sexual relations with pages. While censure is a significant punishment, I assume the punishment wasn't greater because they had committed their crimes many years earlier. There's no evidence that Tip O'Neill covered up for Studds as far as I know. As I've already said, the biggest issue in the Foley scandal is that there was apparently a coverup.