ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
It's a shame that Kurt Warner won the starting job in Arizona. In my opinion, he would be a perfect fit here for this year and beyond. He has been a leader of some of the greatest offensive teams of all time. Yes, he is older, but he is absolutely, the best person besides Brady to lead this offense.
I wonder (1) if he could become available and (2) what it would take to procure his services.
Obviously, he's starting in Arizona, but does that team expect to go with him the entire season? If they were to lose some games in the upcoming weeks, could he become available.
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
i doubt that. clearly i dont believe anything will materialize with Warner, it was just a thought I had. He's a smart man, with the ability to find open men, plus has shown the ability to lead. people can say what they want. he would be a perfect fit, no question.
That division is going to be up for grabs all season long and even if Warner sucks, they don't trust Leinart any more than Warner. They'd just platoon the two in the same game.
__________________
"He said he was bringing something for Rodney Harrison. I don't know. Maybe it was the two dropped passes."
It's a shame that Kurt Warner won the starting job in Arizona. In my opinion, he would be a perfect fit here for this year and beyond. He has been a leader of some of the greatest offensive teams of all time. Yes, he is older, but he is absolutely, the best person besides Brady to lead this offense.
I wonder (1) if he could become available and (2) what it would take to procure his services.
Obviously, he's starting in Arizona, but does that team expect to go with him the entire season? If they were to lose some games in the upcoming weeks, could he become available.
I'm not a big Warner fan. If he were as good as you want to say he is, he wouldnt be struggling to get on the field for the last 5 years.
There is something about Warner, whether its decision making, or holding the ball too long (huge prob when he was with the Giants) or just being a bad teammate, but he has fallen a long, long way. I don't like bringing 'people problems' to the team unless there is a clear need for the level of talent, and I don't see a big wealth of talent either.
It's a shame that Kurt Warner won the starting job in Arizona. In my opinion, he would be a perfect fit here for this year and beyond. He has been a leader of some of the greatest offensive teams of all time. Yes, he is older, but he is absolutely, the best person besides Brady to lead this offense.
I wonder (1) if he could become available and (2) what it would take to procure his services.
Obviously, he's starting in Arizona, but does that team expect to go with him the entire season? If they were to lose some games in the upcoming weeks, could he become available.
If I were going to try to get someone's starter, why would I go after Warner? I'd take Peyton over him any day, or Romo. I'd also prefer Rothliesberger to Warner.
If you are fantasizing about QBs who are currently starting for other teams, why limit yourself to Warner?
I mention Warner because he is one QB who could become available. Don't compare, or consider, Warner as an untouchable. Anyone who would compare him to Romo, Rothlesberger, or Manning is a fool, and I certainly am not. He is older and the Cardinals have a young QB that I assume they think highly of. As a GM, you have to search all options, and he is just one of the many players I would research and try to find out his availability. Any GM who does not do their due dilligence is a GM I do not want.
I mention Warner because he is one QB who could become available. Don't compare, or consider, Warner as an untouchable. Anyone who would compare him to Romo, Rothlesberger, or Manning is a fool, and I certainly am not. He is older and the Cardinals have a young QB that I assume they think highly of. As a GM, you have to search all options, and he is just one of the many players I would research and try to find out his availability. Any GM who does not do their due dilligence is a GM I do not want.
They think so highly of that young QB they started Warner.
- Warner against the SF defense: 19/30 197 yds, 1 TD
- Cassel against the KC defense: 13/18 152 yds, 1 TD
I'll take Cassel thank you.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me." To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.