![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Arcade | Mark Forums Read | Chat Room |
| WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM! |
| ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,346
|
Looks like I might soon join the modern TV age and get a HDTV -
Basically for what I can spend and the room I have I'm down to 2 different models - one a 32 inch LCD and the other a 32 inch plasma I've studied up on the pros and cons of each The Plasma that I saw (at least the store models) side by side with the same brand LCD seemed like it had the better picture - and was $50 less. Wondering what others think about the pros and cons in practice. Seems to me that the Plasma has the better picture but others might disagree. I know the plasmas use more energy - in this case I've compared the two models - one uses a maximum 250 v and the lcd uses a maximum 170 v - I'm not sure what that works out to per month or year of energy costs though. Any other issues or concerns from fellow Patsfans before I make a decision? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fort Lauderdale via NH
Posts: 834
|
Bring a DVD or something comparable to the store, preferably sports oriented, and have them play it on both tv's for you. As a sports first, movies/effects later person, I had to rule out both and go DLP, I just couldn't handle the refresh rate of either lcd or plasma compared to dlp for the cost. I know dlp isn't really available in the size you're talking about, and my gut is that the lcd was the bigger problem with tracers, refresh rate, etc, but definitely do an in-person study. The other question is if you have glare issues - I had big sliding doors to deal with, so plasma wasn't really a good call for me because I'd have gotten reflections way worse than I do now, so if you have a 32" setup only, but also have glare issues, lcd might be your only choice even though the trails you get can be pretty brutal.
Quote:
__________________
-Zeke- My Favorite Article Ever... To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
PatsFans.com Supporter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Hampster!
Posts: 19,370
My Mood:
|
Go to avsforum.com and read the 32" section for knowlegeable comments on TVs there, a much better source than reading here. Me, next spring I'm buying a 32" LCD likely Sony Samsung or Sharp for my rental property. I've had a CRT 34" HD SONY since 2001. Weighs as much as a light OL.
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty. This is known as "bad luck." RAH |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
PatsFans.com Supporter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Hampster!
Posts: 19,370
My Mood:
|
Oh and in case you're a member of the Global Warming cult, here's a concern...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,376304,00.html "Booming demand for flat-screen televisions could have a greater impact on global warming than the world's largest coal-fired power stations, scientists warn. A greenhouse gas called nitrogen trifluoride, used to make the TVs, is 17,000 times more potent than carbon dioxide, said Michael Prather, director of the environment institute at the University of California, Irvine. Prather's research shows production of the gas, which remains in the atmosphere for 550 years, is "exploding". It is expected to double by next year, from the current 4,000 tons produced annually. But unlike other key greenhouse gases — such as carbon dioxide, sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) and perfluorocarbons (PFCs) — emissions of the gas are not restricted under the Kyoto protocol" Another reason to panic!
__________________
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty. This is known as "bad luck." RAH |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
PatsFans.com Supporter
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
B.O. = Fugazi
|
I chose LCD for myself because I love the non glare screen, it wipes out all but the brightest glares. I do get a little motion blurring but it doesn't really bother me. Not sure how it compares to Plasma as I haven't watched a Plasma nearly as much.
Not to be confrontational, but for those on the political forum always yacking about MMGW, I hope you're selling your new HDTVs : http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/07...rifluoride_tv/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Foxwoods Poker Room
Posts: 8,887
My Mood:
|
Unless you have a very dark room forget the plasma. And they are still more prone to burn in than LCDs.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
B.O. = Fugazi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Foxboro
Posts: 8,291
My Mood:
|
LCD is better for smaller tvs and Plasma better for biggerones. I am not sure where the cut off is but I would imagine somewhere in the 32 inch range. There are a lot of other factors too like how much light you get in the room.
__________________
"We go down to New Orleans, and ain't anybody give us a chance? Nobody! And what did we say to them?"
"DON'T TALK TO ME!!!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,346
|
Quote:
If its no worse than a regular TV that doesn't seem like a big issue to me. As it stands we hardly get a chance to watch TV during the day anymore. The "burn in" issue - is that with a static image that burns itself in? Would it happen in normal TV watching? Or only during the initial watching period? I don't do video games so if that's a burn in issue its not a factor. Thanks for all the responses! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|