2012 Positional Needs - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree1Likes

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-20-2011, 09:51 AM   #1
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 395
Default 2012 Positional Needs

Instead of pissing each other off about the strengths/weaknesses/wisdom/follies of the 2011 draft, I want to take a look at the position groups that the Patriots may have needs to draft in 2012. I know this is early as there is no CBA and there is no free agency period where an area of current need could be filled by a vet who gets a six year contract next week. But let's take a look anyways as I am waiting for a massive process to complete at work. I am assuming no rookie Gus Scott contract situations.

Offense
QB: Minimal need, perhaps a late round flyer but with Brady signed for several more years, Hoyer a solid back-up and Mallet as the potential QB of the Future, there is minimal need.

RB: Minimal need, perhaps a late round flyer. Woodhead, Ridley and Vereen are all signed for 2012.

TE: Minimal need. Gronk and Hernandez are both signed for two more years and should hold the #1 and #2 slots/playing time by the end of 2011.

WR: Significant need. Branch and Welker are getting older, and so far Tate, Price and Edelman are question marks. Could see a 2nd round pick used here.

OT: Modest need, could see a Day 3 pick here. Vollmer and hopefully Solder are the long term bookends, but depth is a bit questionable.

Interior OL: Major need --- Connelly could concievably be the only Day 1 2011 starter back. Koppen is getting older and as 3-4 defenses proliferate, he has noticable trouble with big NTs. There are two many IFs here.

Offense, the interior line and the wide receivers have the greatest need given age/contract situations.

Defense
NT: Minimal, although if an athletic 340 pound freak falls into the Pats lap, they will never complain as they spring to the podium.

3-4 DE: Moderate --- Half of the rotation is old or getting to be old, and the other half have not proven they can be every down/every game players.

ILB: Minimal --- Mayo, Spikes, Guyton are all signed for a couple more seasons.

OLB: Significant --- Only Cunningham is on the upside of his career. TBC and Moore are both old for a position that relies on both power and speed, while Ninkovich is solid, he is not spectacular.

CB: Minimal --- Bodden, McCourty are signed for a couple more seasons, Wilhite is the only FA from the current group IIRC, and he is replacable.

Safety: Significant --- Meriweather will be a FA, Sanders is starting to get old. Will Chung and Dowling be the combo of the future?
__________________
Come on over to the Newshoggers for blogging on economics, football, policy analysis,and beer:


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
fester is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 07-20-2011, 11:51 AM   #2
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
ctpatsfan77's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 17,690
My Mood: Grumpy
Default Re: 2012 Positional Needs

Quote:
Originally Posted by fester View Post
NT: Minimal, although if an athletic 340 pound freak falls into the Pats lap, they will never complain as they spring to the podium.
I think this is why some people were suggesting that the Pats might try Cannon out on the DL. I'm not at all in favor of the idea, but I can at least understand the sentiment.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ctpatsfan77 is online now  
Old 07-20-2011, 04:26 PM   #3
PatsFans.com Veteran
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,191
Default Re: 2012 Positional Needs

So we need help at OG, C, WR, DE and OLB (and a late round OT).

This analysis could have been written before the 2010 draft and again before the 2011 draft.

Obviously, we had other needs that were filled, but these needs were there.
mgteich is offline  
Old 07-20-2011, 06:36 PM   #4
On the Roster
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 52
Default Re: 2012 Positional Needs

Quote:
So we need help at OG, C, WR, DE and OLB (and a late round OT).

This analysis could have been written before the 2010 draft and again before the 2011 draft.

Obviously, we had other needs that were filled, but these needs were there.
Very true. It would undoubtedly appear the draft hasn't fallen the way of BB using quality resources on those positions in recent drafts.

It does lead me to ask a question though. Would you swap our starters and depth at any of the other position groups QB, OT, TE, CB, ILB, NT, S or RB with their equivalent position group from any team in the league right now in terms of this year or the potential for future years?
OldEngland is offline  
Old 07-20-2011, 07:44 PM   #5
In the Starting Line-up
 
jsull87's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,250
Default Re: 2012 Positional Needs

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldEngland View Post
Very true. It would undoubtedly appear the draft hasn't fallen the way of BB using quality resources on those positions in recent drafts.

It does lead me to ask a question though. Would you swap our starters and depth at any of the other position groups QB, OT, TE, CB, ILB, NT, S or RB with their equivalent position group from any team in the league right now in terms of this year or the potential for future years?
S Yes. RB Yes. CB Yes (Debatable). S Steelers, RB Vikings. CB GreenBay
jsull87 is offline  
Old 07-20-2011, 08:42 PM   #6
In the Starting Line-up
 
jsull87's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,250
Default Re: 2012 Positional Needs

As Far as positional needs for the draft.

I think a lot depends on the development of Price and Cannon. Also on the resigning of Mankins. I see Price to replace branch and cannon to step in at RG in a perfect world

My personal needs go:

C - Basically due to Koppen's age: 1st/2nd/3rd depending on the talent pool available.

FS - once again depending on the talent available in the draft, both for depth and as a possible Merriweather replacement.

The other picks for me are really just BPA for the team and hopefully continue to trade picks into the future to keep the draft picks coming.
jsull87 is offline  
Old 07-20-2011, 11:10 PM   #7
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 209
Default Re: 2012 Positional Needs

1) Koppen passes to 1st round pick Mike Brewster C Ohio ST. (young Mangold)
2) Vinny Curry nasty DE from Marshall

These two guys will cost around two firsts and two seconds. We take what is left and take them for future picks.

We almost have to sign Mankins because, first and most importantly, our new tackle, Nate Solder, is going to need all the help he can get next to him.

Hopefully we can score a good 5 technique by picking up UDFA Brandon Bair, plus there's some nice looking offensive linemen.

We'll be in great shape if we only need to fill a couple of holes. And, there's always UDFA's next year.
Frick is offline  
Old 07-21-2011, 06:06 AM   #8
Practice Squad
 
Defsoul's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 328
Default Re: 2012 Positional Needs

Right now, my guess at the biggest positional needs would be C/G and OLB. I don't see Mankins staying longterm in New England and Koppen is set to become an 32 year old UFA in 2012. Marcus Cannon could become Mankins successor at LG, but they would still need someone to play center unless Wendell or Ohrnberger can step in. The Patriots could move Connolly over to center, but then they would need someone to play RG. So it's either center or guard for me.

The second big need in my eyes is OLB. They have only two guys signed through 2012 (unless you're sure that Markell Carter will make the team), Cunningham and Banta-Cain and Banta-Cain hasn't lived up to the big contract he signed in 2010. OLB is a position where the Patriots lack quality and quantity, so drafting a guy would make sense, wouldn't it?
Defsoul is offline  
Old 07-21-2011, 07:49 AM   #9
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 395
Default Re: 2012 Positional Needs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frick View Post
1) Koppen passes to 1st round pick Mike Brewster C Ohio ST. (young Mangold)
2) Vinny Curry nasty DE from Marshall

These two guys will cost around two firsts and two seconds. We take what is left and take them for future picks.

And when was the last time the Patriots went all in to grab a blue chipper?

I think your scenario is very unlikely. I could see a scenario where the Pats use both firsts and a second or a third to move around to grab two guys they love, but not 80% of their draft capital on just two guys.
__________________
Come on over to the Newshoggers for blogging on economics, football, policy analysis,and beer:


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
fester is offline  
Old 07-21-2011, 10:02 AM   #10
Practice Squad
 
Defsoul's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 328
Default Re: 2012 Positional Needs

FWIW, NFL Draft Scout has given Mike Brewster a 3rd round grade and he is their second best center among seniors, behind Georgia's Ben Jones who holds a 2nd round grade.

Last edited by Defsoul; 07-21-2011 at 10:03 AM..
Defsoul is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Positional Rankings from NFP mayoclinic Patriots Draft Talk 2 04-20-2009 04:29 PM
Positional Analysis: WR-TE bobgeorge PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 0 05-01-2007 12:19 AM
Positional Analysis--QBs Pats726 PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 4 08-02-2005 12:42 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC