Tom Curran's draft primer... - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-14-2007, 11:45 AM   #21
Role Player
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: STILL Pursuing Perfection
Posts: 1,776
Default Re: Tom Curran's draft primer...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta Patsfan View Post
I've found Curran's draft primers to be rehashed draft guides. I don't think he really follows college football to the extent needed to provide new and useful insight. This is also the case for most newspaper writers who are really writing for the benefit of more casual fan.

Agree that his choices and write-ups sound banal.
But what should he do, make stuff up?

I'm paying attention to Curran's words because
i presume that a good jolt of his "NFL scouts and front office people" still work in Foxboro.
Kremlinologists might glean some true Pats-think in there.
psychoPat is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 04-14-2007, 12:21 PM   #22
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,550
Default Re: Tom Curran's draft primer...

Quote:
Originally Posted by biffman View Post
Timmons sounds intruiging. We could use him situationally for a year or so and then have him starting in year two.

Tony Pauline says... "Explosive athlete who plays bigger than his listed size. Makes plays all over the field and really forces the action. Defeats blocks, beats running backs to the corners and easily covers tight ends down the field. Not completely there just yet but has only started for one year."

Where is he projected to go? Late first/early second?
NFLDraftScout.com who has him as their #2 ILB:
[quote]...Steps up to fill quickly on inside runs, but needs to protect his body better, as he doesn't shed well...His lack of ideal bulk and brute strength will see him get pushed back when trying to fill rush lanes between the tackles...[quote]Small linebackers need not apply, this kid would need to add 16 lbs. of muscle to reach the prototype weight for a Pats ILB. He might be able to do that, but he'd be better off going to a 4-3 offense and using his speed and quickness in a system that values small, fast linebackers.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is offline  
Old 04-14-2007, 03:37 PM   #23
In the Starting Line-up
 
Seneschal2's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,221
My Mood: Inspired
Default Re: Tom Curran's draft primer...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta Patsfan View Post
I've found Curran's draft primers to be rehashed draft guides. I don't think he really follows college football to the extent needed to provide new and useful insight. This is also the case for most newspaper writers who are really writing for the benefit of more casual fan.
Did you miss this part:

"Compiled after conversations with NFL scouts and front office personnel and Tony Pauline."

So based on that tidbit of info, exactly how much of these primers come from each of those sources -- we don't really know. I do agree, that after reading hundreds of profiles, much of it is familiar and old news.

My only reason for starting the topic was the hope that Curran's primers would have a Patriots' slant to them, with maybe a clue here or there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by psychoPat View Post
I'm paying attention to Curran's words because
i presume that a good jolt of his "NFL scouts and front office people" still work in Foxboro.
Kremlinologists might glean some true Pats-think in there.
Exactly, and thank you.
__________________
"What we want to try to do is maximize each spot on the roster; we want to be stronger at No. 1 than the opponent, stronger at No. 25 than they are, and stronger at No. 53 than they are, we're always looking to upgrade the talent level on the team, and play together to be functional."
- Bill Belichick -
Seneschal2 is offline  
Old 04-14-2007, 05:43 PM   #24
On The Game Day Roster
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 475
Default Re: Tom Curran's draft primer...

What the hell does Curran know about football!!!!
bruinator is offline  
Old 04-14-2007, 05:54 PM   #25
All Pro Poster
 
VJCPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,634
Default Re: Tom Curran's draft primer...

Quote:
Originally Posted by dryheat44 View Post
Apparently Waters looked fine at his workout, so really it's just a question of rust. Bishop isn't in the same league as a healthy Waters. I could be talked into drafting him at #91 if we haven't gotten our LB yet. If Bishop is there in the sixth round, I wouldn't be opposed to picking him up, but he's not going to give you what Waters will.
Well the difference in the two is investment vs value. I think a 3rd rounder is a bit high to risk on a guy like Waters coming off injury. Whereas there is virtually no risk to spending one of our many 6th rounders for a 2 down run stuffer like Bishop. I don't necessarily disagree that Waters might be more talented than Bishop... but I don't want to spend a high pick on him either.
__________________
Pats NEW LOOK Offense

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Weapons Galore!
VJCPatriot is online now  
Old 04-14-2007, 07:17 PM   #26
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,550
Default Re: Tom Curran's draft primer...

Quote:
Originally Posted by psychoPat View Post
Agree that his choices and write-ups sound banal.
But what should he do, make stuff up?

I'm paying attention to Curran's words because
i presume that a good jolt of his "NFL scouts and front office people" still work in Foxboro.
Kremlinologists might glean some true Pats-think in there.
Okay, let's play Kremlinologist.

Paul Posluszny, Penn State: What Curran wrote - He's going to have to get a little bigger to play on the same side as the tight end in the NFL...Has to improve at shedding and is adequate but not outstanding in coverage...Probably not fast enough to be on the weak side. What he quoted - "He has the ability to anticipate plays before they occur and is always flying around the ball...Has the versatility to be used on the outside or at inside linebacker in a 3-4 alignment."
- Analysis: 6'1.5" 238, he lacks 12 lbs to match the Pats LB prototype. So Curran says he needs to 'get bigger' to handle 240-270 lb Tight Ends? Go figure, what does he need to do to handle 300+ lb OL? He has to improve shedding - all college LBs need to improve here. Speed is not as critical for a 3-4 LB. He quotes anticipation - a good thing if you're looking for Tedy's replacement as Field General. Versatility to be a 3-4 LB.
- Summation: Posluszny is a too small Pats prospect as far as size, he'd need time for Woicik to build him up. Expect him to get most of his reps on Special Teams in year one, and maybe get some platoon time in year two.
- Draft value: Expected to go in late first/early second, he's in the Pats' ballpark. Question: Is he that much more valuable then later, larger ILB prospects?

Jon Beason, Miami: What Curran wrote - can sniff out plays in short yardage...on the small side to be an inside linebacker. What he quoted - great range to the sidelines...makes a lot of plays in pursuit...overrated...does more chasing plays than actual forcing the action.
- Analysis: 6' 1/4" 237 at the Combine & 229 at his Pro-day. Curran says he's on the "small side" - Pos needs to get bigger, this kid is going to find it nearly impossible to reach that Pats' prototype 250. The quotes tell it all, "pursuit" is a Tampa-2 strength.
- Summation: Extremely bad fit in a 3-4 role.
- Draft value: Pre-draft decoy.

Lawrence Timmons, Florida State: What Curran wrote - plays smoothly and shows excellent anticipation skills...Blows up a lot of plays...Strong with good size...Good in pursuit...has plenty left to learn about the position. What he quoted - Makes plays all over the field and really forces the action. Defeats blocks, beats running backs to the corners and easily covers tight ends down the field. Not completely there just yet.
- Analysis: 6' 7/8" 234 he would have benefitted from another year in college. His athleticism makes him attractive, his anticipation speaks to Bruschi replacement value. He's a downhill player who does well fending off big boys.
- Summation: "Pursuit" is a Tampa-2 strength. Defeating blocks is a 3-4 strength, the question, does a player 16 lbs. lighter than the Pats' prototype LB have the sand to play head-to-head with the big boys inside? How does he defeat blocks? 6'1" Tedy Bruschi does it by sliding off the block and around the blocker to make the play. Taller, longer armed Vrabel does it by handfighting the blocker and keeping him in the hole. Can a player a smidgeon under 6'1" play like Tedy to evade the longer-armed OL in the NFL?
- Draft value: A reasonable late 1st round value, for a 4-3 team.

Stewart Bradley, Nebraska: What Curran writes - Excellent size and power...Can take on blocks as a run-stuffer and is brings a lot of power off the edge as a pass rusher...Decent in coverage for a big guy and a good worker with football smarts...not the smoothest guy...[in] pursuit...versatile defender. What he quotes - ...powerful linebacker who forces the action up the field...Leaves a trail of blockers in his wake...dominant at the point of attack...Plays heads-up football...limitations in coverage or when asked to make plays in reverse.
- Analysis: 6'3 1/2" 254 a classic prototype LB in height and weight. He is also a classic Pats' 3-4 LB defeating blockers head-to-head, strong at the point of attack, blessed with football smarts that translate on the field, and versatile as to position. In his first year coming off of ACL surgery he has limitations in coverage, yet covers pretty well for a big guy - what can he do with another year and good coaching?
- Summation: What more do people want? He comes from a read and react defense with prototype size and a high football IQ.
- Draft value: Do you take an almost perfect fit in late round one? Or wait and hope he's still there at 91?

Justin Durant, Hampton: What Curran writes - Speedy and tremendous in pursuit...can cover well...good and vocal leader who works hard...smaller school...relying on speed...have to become adept at shedding. What Curran quoted - weak-side one-gap linebacker... Explodes up the field in run defense yet also gets depth on pass drops in coverage...needs to play in a system which allows him to freely flow to the action unabated.
- Analysis: 6' 7/8" 230 he's the same size as Timmerman, yet .15 sec faster in the 40 and quicker, but not as good at taking on blocks. Good in coverage (16 passes defensed in career).
- Summation: Durant sounds just like a SS.
- Draft value: Not a 3-4 linebacker, but has value at SS.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is offline  
Old 04-14-2007, 11:26 PM   #27
Role Player
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: STILL Pursuing Perfection
Posts: 1,776
Default Re: Tom Curran's draft primer...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Box_O_Rocks View Post
Okay, let's play Kremlinologist.

Paul Posluszny, Penn State: What Curran wrote - He's going to have to get a little bigger to play on the same side as the tight end in the NFL...Has to improve at shedding and is adequate but not outstanding in coverage...Probably not fast enough to be on the weak side. What he quoted - "He has the ability to anticipate plays before they occur and is always flying around the ball...Has the versatility to be used on the outside or at inside linebacker in a 3-4 alignment."
- Analysis: 6'1.5" 238, he lacks 12 lbs to match the Pats LB prototype. So Curran says he needs to 'get bigger' to handle 240-270 lb Tight Ends? Go figure, what does he need to do to handle 300+ lb OL? He has to improve shedding - all college LBs need to improve here. Speed is not as critical for a 3-4 LB. He quotes anticipation - a good thing if you're looking for Tedy's replacement as Field General. Versatility to be a 3-4 LB.
- Summation: Posluszny is a too small Pats prospect as far as size, he'd need time for Woicik to build him up. Expect him to get most of his reps on Special Teams in year one, and maybe get some platoon time in year two.
- Draft value: Expected to go in late first/early second, he's in the Pats' ballpark. Question: Is he that much more valuable then later, larger ILB prospects?

Jon Beason, Miami: What Curran wrote - can sniff out plays in short yardage...on the small side to be an inside linebacker. What he quoted - great range to the sidelines...makes a lot of plays in pursuit...overrated...does more chasing plays than actual forcing the action.
- Analysis: 6' 1/4" 237 at the Combine & 229 at his Pro-day. Curran says he's on the "small side" - Pos needs to get bigger, this kid is going to find it nearly impossible to reach that Pats' prototype 250. The quotes tell it all, "pursuit" is a Tampa-2 strength.
- Summation: Extremely bad fit in a 3-4 role.
- Draft value: Pre-draft decoy.

Lawrence Timmons, Florida State: What Curran wrote - plays smoothly and shows excellent anticipation skills...Blows up a lot of plays...Strong with good size...Good in pursuit...has plenty left to learn about the position. What he quoted - Makes plays all over the field and really forces the action. Defeats blocks, beats running backs to the corners and easily covers tight ends down the field. Not completely there just yet.
- Analysis: 6' 7/8" 234 he would have benefitted from another year in college. His athleticism makes him attractive, his anticipation speaks to Bruschi replacement value. He's a downhill player who does well fending off big boys.
- Summation: "Pursuit" is a Tampa-2 strength. Defeating blocks is a 3-4 strength, the question, does a player 16 lbs. lighter than the Pats' prototype LB have the sand to play head-to-head with the big boys inside? How does he defeat blocks? 6'1" Tedy Bruschi does it by sliding off the block and around the blocker to make the play. Taller, longer armed Vrabel does it by handfighting the blocker and keeping him in the hole. Can a player a smidgeon under 6'1" play like Tedy to evade the longer-armed OL in the NFL?
- Draft value: A reasonable late 1st round value, for a 4-3 team.

Stewart Bradley, Nebraska: What Curran writes - Excellent size and power...Can take on blocks as a run-stuffer and is brings a lot of power off the edge as a pass rusher...Decent in coverage for a big guy and a good worker with football smarts...not the smoothest guy...[in] pursuit...versatile defender. What he quotes - ...powerful linebacker who forces the action up the field...Leaves a trail of blockers in his wake...dominant at the point of attack...Plays heads-up football...limitations in coverage or when asked to make plays in reverse.
- Analysis: 6'3 1/2" 254 a classic prototype LB in height and weight. He is also a classic Pats' 3-4 LB defeating blockers head-to-head, strong at the point of attack, blessed with football smarts that translate on the field, and versatile as to position. In his first year coming off of ACL surgery he has limitations in coverage, yet covers pretty well for a big guy - what can he do with another year and good coaching?
- Summation: What more do people want? He comes from a read and react defense with prototype size and a high football IQ.
- Draft value: Do you take an almost perfect fit in late round one? Or wait and hope he's still there at 91?

Justin Durant, Hampton: What Curran writes - Speedy and tremendous in pursuit...can cover well...good and vocal leader who works hard...smaller school...relying on speed...have to become adept at shedding. What Curran quoted - weak-side one-gap linebacker... Explodes up the field in run defense yet also gets depth on pass drops in coverage...needs to play in a system which allows him to freely flow to the action unabated.
- Analysis: 6' 7/8" 230 he's the same size as Timmerman, yet .15 sec faster in the 40 and quicker, but not as good at taking on blocks. Good in coverage (16 passes defensed in career).
- Summation: Durant sounds just like a SS.
- Draft value: Not a 3-4 linebacker, but has value at SS.

This is EXACTLY what i envisioned someone
with a lot of interest ... patience ... and specific knowledge doing!
It is such an outstanding illustration of Kremlinology
that i wonder if Box hasn't practised that craft before.

If you care to, kind sir, i would love to see your comparable treatment of Curran's CB and S write-ups.
Fascinating that these are the three positions he covers first!
psychoPat is offline  
Old 04-15-2007, 07:53 PM   #28
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
Box_O_Rocks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,550
Default Re: Tom Curran's draft primer...

Kremlinology part Two: ILB

Patrick Willis, Mississippi: What Curran writes - Everything you want in a player...Extremely productive with good size and good speed...sharpen his cover skills a fair amount. What Curran quotes - who can dominate play in the box...good job diagnosing the action and getting to the spot...Must now learn to make plays moving in reverse.
- Analysis: 6'1 1/8" 242, down to 237 at his Pro-day. Willis at the Combine lacked 8 lbs. of being the Pats prototype LB. He's everything you want, except...coverage. He diagnoses well, but what is diagnostics compared to anticipation (See Posluszny, Timmons) or 'Heads Up' football (See Bradley)? Which is the better quality(ies) for a Field General?
- Summation: Despite the enthusiastic opening, this is an incomplete player with a whole new skill set to learn. Not a bad thing, but it should be a splash of cold water. It also leaves the question of his ability as a Field General unanswered. Anticipation I've already equated to Field General skills. In the service a 'Heads Up' individual saw the danger/hazard/consequences before the action occured and took steps to arrange the best possible outcome before hand. Diagnoses sounds good, but it also seems to be in step with the action, and not ahead of it. The one thing you don't read is his ability to take on blockers, a 3-4 requirement.
- Note: Full disclosure - I've not considered Willis an adequate 3-4 LB for some time, that may be coloring my perceptions now. I like to think I'm compensating for my bias, but you must make up your own mind.
- Draft value: First round, for a 4-3 team.

David Harris, Michigan: What Curran writes - Effective...reads and reacts to the run...Good at taking on blockers and holding the point...Hard-working... stiff...sharpen his ability...productive..could be utilized in a 3-4. What Curran quotes - underrated player...He's a tough, instinctive...improve his pass coverage.
- Analysis: 6'2 1/4" 243 Harris lacks 7 lbs. of being the prototype Pats' LB and being taller than Willis and Timmons may have a larger frame to carry the weight. He also needs to improve in pass coverage, but like the others will improve with good coaching. He takes on blockers well, a 3-4 strength. What we don't read is his ability to be a Field General.
- Summation: He has the basic 3-4 skill requirement, an ability to take on blockers. Coverage skills can be learned. The issue of his Field General skills remains unresolved.
- Draft value: Considered a 2nd round value, Harris is available for the Pats and is an adequate 3-4 ILB.

Brandon Siler, Florida: What Curran writes - blue-collar...understands the position...quick and instinctive...pursuit...He's a junior...robotic...in coverage...Thinks he's really good. What Curran quotes - forceful run-defending...explosive...packs a wallop at the point of attack...rough edges...starting potential.
- Analysis: 6'1 3/4" 241 instinctive, explosive, blue-collar are all great sounding, but Curran makes a point of noting he came out early and "thinks he's really good." Translation, he's a potential problem child.
- Summation: Fuggedaboutit.
- Draft value: nil.

Anthony Waters, Clemson: What Curran writes - Terrific size...Runs well, takes the reins on the defense...uncertainty...has to work on shed techniques...less than ideal technique...suspended after a 2004 brawl...nice fit in a 3-4 system. What Curran quotes - tremendous...sideline-to-sideline...Fast in all directions
- Analysis: 6'2 1/2" 245 he lacks 5 lbs of the Pats' prototype LB. The ideal ILB in terms of size, leadership, and speed, once he learns how to stack and shed properly.
- Summation: A nice fit for the Pats if they can land him.
- Draft value: Curran predicts the third round, some rankings have him in the 7th or undrafted. The Pats may need to bundle 2nd day picks with #91 and if they want him.

Buster Davis, Florida State: What Curran writes - Nasty little...finds the football at all costs...terrific first step...well in coverage...a little short...productive and durable...on the small side...guard against getting overweight...too much of a size risk. What Curran quotes - Were Davis five inches taller...terrific combination of smarts, intensity and playing speed...Size is a major concern...exploit him in coverage.
- Analysis: 5'9 3/8" 239 smurf LB. An excellent player at the college level who may not be as successful against Pro-caliber players.
- Summation: His size argues against seeing him in a 3-4.
- Draft value: Curran feels his value is in the third round, but that presumes he'll be playing in the 4-3 he knows.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Box_O_Rocks is offline  
Old 04-15-2007, 09:28 PM   #29
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hershey, PA
Posts: 7,155
My Mood: Angry
Default Re: Tom Curran's draft primer...

Wow. Terrific thread, guys. I love reading this stuff.
__________________
Question Authority.
captain stone is offline  
Old 04-16-2007, 06:29 AM   #30
Practice Squad
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 128
Default Re: Tom Curran's draft primer...

Awesome breakdown BOR - this is what I needed to start my morning, along with this cup of coffee.
c_nice_37 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC