Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
This is a somewhat selfish thread however I really do believe it will interest many of you. I am taking a Statistics course in my MBA program and have decided to do my final project on the NFL Draft. I am going to take into account all possible measureables and see there relationship to draft position. These include:
HT, WT, 40 time, benchpress, Wonderlic, college winning %, Program size, etc.
I have just begun thinking about this and would love some advice. But ultimately I am going to find trends in the draft for position and overall according to these measurables. I am also going to try and compare our top 100 lists to actual results to get an idea of how strong the projectors were. If anyone knows a great website where I could easily find the data for each draftee please let me know. If people are interested, I would also be happy to post my results.
__________________
In front of his team after a 28-10 loss to the Packers in 2002, Belichick said: "We have a lot of smart guys in this room, but on the football field we play like a bunch of f------- morons. If you are one of the players flinching at the harshness of these words, you might as well begin packing. There is no way you are going to last as a New England Patriot."
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Probably gonna go the route of Multiple Linear Regression as this is only an MBa course. I am actually a Electrical Engineer by trade so I know some other anylsis as well however I don't think I can use them. Should be interesting though, I am curious to know how the 40 time vs the wonderlic plays out in which is more influential and other things of that nature.
__________________
In front of his team after a 28-10 loss to the Packers in 2002, Belichick said: "We have a lot of smart guys in this room, but on the football field we play like a bunch of f------- morons. If you are one of the players flinching at the harshness of these words, you might as well begin packing. There is no way you are going to last as a New England Patriot."
Are you trying to determine how much athletic measurables play into where a player actually gets drafted, or using the study to form a value judgment of your own on where a player should be drafted? Either way, i look forward to your study.
Probably gonna go the route of Multiple Linear Regression as this is only an MBa course. I am actually a Electrical Engineer by trade so I know some other anylsis as well however I don't think I can use them. Should be interesting though, I am curious to know how the 40 time vs the wonderlic plays out in which is more influential and other things of that nature.
I'll see Clonamery's headache and raise him one pained *****!
NFLDraftScout.com ($25/yr) has the best player measurables of any draftsite, though even there you will get holes in your data. I assume you are going to control for team system Tampa-2 vs. 46 vs. San Diego 3-4 vs. Pats' 3-4?
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me." To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I'll see Clonamery's headache and raise him one pained *****!
NFLDraftScout.com ($25/yr) has the best player measurables of any draftsite, though even there you will get holes in your data. I assume you are going to control for team system Tampa-2 vs. 46 vs. San Diego 3-4 vs. Pats' 3-4?
I'm not going to lie to you Box, ideally the Tampa-2, 46, 3-4 and so forth would be a better overall way to go, I just don't know if I would be able to do a credible comparison with team's broken down by system. I know it's a shortcut, but in one of these kinds of projects there is only so much you can do. I would have to presume that the worth of one player is way more to one team then another, however within a draft format either team could either trade up or down accordingly to take advantage of this discrepency. Hopefully this will be a sort of "middle ground" to get an overall view of the Draft as seen by the NFL. If say Cinci see Gaines available at # 12 or so they may move up in front of some 3/4 teams out of fear that other 4/3 teams might do the same.
But overall, the biggest reason is I'm not sure I could analyze via system is I don't think I have enough football knowledge, however I would be HAPPY to keep this study a growing project and continue to post it here for any critique offered, I certainly am looking for any feedback that could help make this be worthy tool to observe Draft trends.
__________________
In front of his team after a 28-10 loss to the Packers in 2002, Belichick said: "We have a lot of smart guys in this room, but on the football field we play like a bunch of f------- morons. If you are one of the players flinching at the harshness of these words, you might as well begin packing. There is no way you are going to last as a New England Patriot."
Here is a little bit of data I pulled together for the WR position.
Thanks Bunzo, this is exactly the kind of stuff I am looking to start with. I also plan on dropping the $25 on NFLDraftScout.
__________________
In front of his team after a 28-10 loss to the Packers in 2002, Belichick said: "We have a lot of smart guys in this room, but on the football field we play like a bunch of f------- morons. If you are one of the players flinching at the harshness of these words, you might as well begin packing. There is no way you are going to last as a New England Patriot."
Are you trying to determine how much athletic measurables play into where a player actually gets drafted, or using the study to form a value judgment of your own on where a player should be drafted? Either way, i look forward to your study.
Oh and ultimately the study will reflect on where a player got drafted and what reasons why, however going up until the draft I intend on trying my best to set my own overall rankings system, which is obviously gonna be a load of cr@p but the intent is to to have some form of baseline so as to when it happens I can compare it to where people went and why. I also plan on trying to set my own rankings via measurables and compare it to the experts. Again to recap though, the study will be numbers only and not take into account any game footage, but it will be interesting if perhaps some teams tend to trend towards great measurables while others do not, ie. Bengals taking talent but not character.
__________________
In front of his team after a 28-10 loss to the Packers in 2002, Belichick said: "We have a lot of smart guys in this room, but on the football field we play like a bunch of f------- morons. If you are one of the players flinching at the harshness of these words, you might as well begin packing. There is no way you are going to last as a New England Patriot."