big mike

The SI article on risers/droppers intrigued me about David Thomas, the Texas Tight End, when it mentioned that at their Pro Day he demonstrated his ability to be a long snapper. Given BB's predilection for people who can play multiple roles, THomas is an intriguing possibility as a mid-round TE pick. We need a third string TE (and as a pure TE, he'd definitely be behind Watson and Graham) - but could then serve as a backup LS, eventually replacing Paxton.

BelichickFan

It is interesting but he's more of an H back prospect than a TE. My guess is that we'll draft a #3 TE who can replace Graham in 2007, assuming Graham moves on as a UFA.

dryheat44

I did notice that during my research...and another player on the draft board too. I wish I could remember. I think he's a linebacker, and someone we've discussed.

__________________
When it's third and 10, you can have the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time. -- R.I.P. Max McGee

Box_O_Rocks

Thomas really helped himself with his workout, I still have him second day, but he'd get some strong consideration.

__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

big mike

John Busin, LB from Miami (OH) I assume? Yes, I was intrigued with him also - he's an LB with great speed, and on his Pro Day demonstrated great pass catching skills, as some teams were interested in his ability to play TE.

I can see BB being interested in these guys as a 3rd TE who can also contribute elsewhere as needed.

dryheat44

No. Actually I was recollecting wrong. I was thinking of RB Garrett Mills, whom I like as a Paddy Pass type of catch-all offensive player.

__________________
When it's third and 10, you can have the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time. -- R.I.P. Max McGee

Ochmed Jones

If the Pats were to take Thomas on day 2 and Thomas is indeed a decent LS, that might make Hochstien a little nervous.

dryheat44

Why not Lonnie? At least Hochstein is a servicable backup, at three positions. Paxton exists for one reason only.

Of course, if Thomas is pretty good, and not very good, then I would keep Paxton. Thomas wouldn't be taking up an additional roster spot, he'd be the third TE.

I regret not learning to long-snap. Bet your ass my son is going to be out there practicing.

__________________
When it's third and 10, you can have the milk drinkers and I'll take the whiskey drinkers every time. -- R.I.P. Max McGee

patpatriot

Remember that Giants playoff game where they had some old-timer they resurected because they lost their LS? Cost them the game. Lonnie is A#1. It's harder than it looks I guess.

DaBruinz

An intriguing prospect also is Jonathan Scott. He can, literally, play every position on the o-line AND long snap. Yes, he's been a center, guard and tackle, AND can long snap. Talk about being versatile. I'd like the Pats to grab him to replace Gorin, personally.