moving up for a "sure thing" - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > PatsFans.com Forums > PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum > Patriots Draft Talk
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-22-2010, 04:56 PM   #21
Practice Squad
 
MustaphaM0nd's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 381
Default Re: moving up for a "sure thing"

there is NO sure thing. There are some "surer" things, but even that is ambiguous.

This organization hasn't drafted well in a while, but I don't think that either going straight to top 10 or hoarding 3rd round picks is the solution. Contrary to what lots of people here seem to think, there is a middle ground.

Taking one first-rounder is a 50% pick, taking two 2nd rounders who are 25% picks, you are likely to get a real keeper, and could end up with three. Voila.

The later rounds also sometimes produce. Brady? Troy Brown? more recently, Vollmer and Edelman?
I think instead of worrying about "sure things", the patriots should dispose of some "sure not things" and get compensatory picks.

Yeah, we have a lot of scrubs, but thats a reflection of bad personnel work by the organization. Doesn't mean that drafting isn't the answer.

Last edited by MustaphaM0nd; 01-22-2010 at 04:57 PM.. Reason: deleted an incoherent paragraph
MustaphaM0nd is offline  
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-22-2010, 05:10 PM   #22
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,895
My Mood: Pensive
Default Re: moving up for a "sure thing"

Quote:
Originally Posted by mayoclinic View Post
When was that?

BB traded up in the 1st twice, in 2002 (31 -> 21 for Dan Graham) and 2003 (14 -> 13 for Ty Warren). He traded back twice, in 2007 (7 -> 10 for Jerod Mayo) and 2009 (23 -> 26 -> 41). And he traded into the next year twice, in 2003 (19 -> 41 + a 2004 1st, which became Wilfork) and 2007 (28 -> a 2008 1st, which became Mayo, and a 4th which became Moss).

BB has traded up 5 times in the 2nd round: 50 -> 48 in 2001 for Matt Light, 41 -> 36 in 2003 for Eugene Wilson, 50 -> 45 in 2003 for Bethel Johnson, 52 -> 36 in 2006 for Chad Jackson, and 47 -> 40 in 2009 for Ron Brace. The only time BB has traded back or out of the 2nd round (other than trades for a player, such as Corey Dillon in 2004 and Wes Welker in 2007) was in 2005, when he traded #64 to Baltimore for a 2005 3rd (used on Ellis Hobbs) and a 2006 3rd (used to trade up for Chad Jackson).
Hmmm. I suspect that BB never trades UP for a WR ever again in our lifetimes.

MaineMan is offline  
Old 01-22-2010, 05:12 PM   #23
Let's go HEAT!
 
KontradictioN's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Floreeda
Posts: 21,287
Blog Entries: 5
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: moving up for a "sure thing"

I think Berry is pretty close to a sure thing. He almost single handedly shut down the Gators' offense in the two teams' meeting this past season. However, our needs considered, the only guy I would move up for in the draft would be Dunlap. I think he would look great as an OLB in our system.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


CREDIT - Sicilian
KontradictioN is offline  
Old 01-22-2010, 05:18 PM   #24
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 522
My Mood: Happy
Default Re: moving up for a "sure thing"

Quote:
Originally Posted by mayoclinic View Post
When was that?

BB traded up in the 1st twice, in 2002 (31 -> 21 for Dan Graham) and 2003 (14 -> 13 for Ty Warren). He traded back twice, in 2007 (7 -> 10 for Jerod Mayo) and 2009 (23 -> 26 -> 41). And he traded into the next year twice, in 2003 (19 -> 41 + a 2004 1st, which became Wilfork) and 2007 (28 -> a 2008 1st, which became Mayo, and a 4th which became Moss).

BB has traded up 5 times in the 2nd round: 50 -> 48 in 2001 for Matt Light, 41 -> 36 in 2003 for Eugene Wilson, 50 -> 45 in 2003 for Bethel Johnson, 52 -> 36 in 2006 for Chad Jackson, and 47 -> 40 in 2009 for Ron Brace. The only time BB has traded back or out of the 2nd round (other than trades for a player, such as Corey Dillon in 2004 and Wes Welker in 2007) was in 2005, when he traded #64 to Baltimore for a 2005 3rd (used on Ellis Hobbs) and a 2006 3rd (used to trade up for Chad Jackson).
Hi Mayo - you either have a great memory or are quick with google. I am only using my almost 50 year old memory - but I am glad to see that I was not mistaken.

First round (which I said in my post was my point of reference). As you pointed out -he has traded up (2x ) - thank for the Graham info -forgot that one. And down / out (I did not write out) - but in my meaning trading out (of the first) is a form of trading down. Picking up extra picks in compensation for moving out of your draft slot. And with your excellent summary above - this has happened 5 times. So it is 5 to 2 or alittle over double as many times. Instead of staying at his spot he has shown the perpensity to be much more likely of moving down / out of the slot instead of moving up (speaking about the first round).

And as the contract costs of first round picks is increasing very fast (look at the increases in guaranteed dollars) - I expect Bill to continue this for the forseeable future , unless a rookie salary wage is instituted. There is diminishing value in first round picks as these first round contracts continue to increase at a faster rate than other round contracts (again see the guaranteed dollars increases).
SunnyDenmark is offline  
Old 01-22-2010, 05:23 PM   #25
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,842
Default Re: moving up for a "sure thing"

I would be shocked BUT happpy if BB traded up to get that player but don't expect it.

To me Rolando McClain would be that guy to do it for. He would be our leader on defense.
carolinatony is offline  
Old 01-22-2010, 05:25 PM   #26
Let's go HEAT!
 
KontradictioN's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Floreeda
Posts: 21,287
Blog Entries: 5
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: moving up for a "sure thing"

Quote:
Originally Posted by carolinatony View Post
I would be shocked BUT happpy if BB traded up to get that player but don't expect it.

To me Rolando McClain would be that guy to do it for. He would be our leader on defense.
I expect McClain to go top five. I think most people do. There's probably a snowball's chance in hell that the Patriots will move into the top five this year when they have a top five waiting for them in 2011, a year which looks like it will come after another turbulent season for the Raiders.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


CREDIT - Sicilian
KontradictioN is offline  
Old 01-22-2010, 05:31 PM   #27
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,895
My Mood: Pensive
Default Re: moving up for a "sure thing"

Quote:
Originally Posted by mayoclinic View Post
So we basically got Ron Brace, Matt Slater, Oscar Lua and Kareem Brown for what could have been Steward Bradley in 2007 and our #124 and #199 in 2009?

That's a non-brainer. Bradley's a stud, and would have been a terrific SILB next to Mayo. Lua and Brown were cut, Slater's a replaceable STer, and Brace has done nothing so far. If Brace turns out to be great it will be different, but Bradley and Mayo could have given us a solid ILB base for a decade.
Yeah. No question that the way it's worked out so far (minus a "final grade" on Brace) pretty much s**ks.

OTOH, it's kinda neat how BB took a pick worth 136 points, traded it for a player (Lua) plus a pick worth 245 points, then trade THAT for a player (Slater) plus a pick worth 430 points. If the actual player selections had been better . . .

BTW, IIRC, Oscar Lua was looking like the proverbial hidden gem in Camp until, at some point (and I forget the details), he suffered a back injury in camp sufficiently severe that he was medically advised not to attempt to play contact sports ever again. I flashed on this when I heard about Tyrone McKenzie's injury and thought, Oh, f Not again!"

But, still, Lua only cost a #211 (about 7 points), and Slater a #153 and a #238 (about 31 points). So the real loss on all that dealing has been the non-performance of Brace.

Anyway, the problem is not the trading down or the trading into next year or the refusing to trade up, it's selecting the wrong players.

Last edited by Michael; 01-22-2010 at 07:05 PM..
MaineMan is offline  
Old 01-22-2010, 05:42 PM   #28
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 522
My Mood: Happy
Default Re: moving up for a "sure thing"

Quote:
Originally Posted by KontradictioN View Post
I expect McClain to go top five. I think most people do. There's probably a snowball's chance in hell that the Patriots will move into the top five this year when they have a top five waiting for them in 2011, a year which looks like it will come after another turbulent season for the Raiders.
Good point. There likely MIGHT be a rookie salary cap in place for the 2011 - but obviously that can fall through as well (as a new CBA). And then could be the lockout year. So even more unlikely Bill would trade up this year into top 10 and and have all that money (2 years in a row) invested in only 2 new players.
SunnyDenmark is offline  
Old 01-22-2010, 05:51 PM   #29
In the Starting Line-up
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,842
Default Re: moving up for a "sure thing"

Quote:
Originally Posted by KontradictioN View Post
I expect McClain to go top five. I think most people do. There's probably a snowball's chance in hell that the Patriots will move into the top five this year when they have a top five waiting for them in 2011, a year which looks like it will come after another turbulent season for the Raiders.



I didn't think he was going that High. If he fell to 12-14 I could see a move up but not into the top 10 .
carolinatony is offline  
Old 01-22-2010, 05:51 PM   #30
Second Team and Threatening Starter's Job
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,141
Blog Entries: 4
Default Re: moving up for a "sure thing"

Excuse me... I stopped reading at Eric Berry from Texas.
__________________
"It's not whether you get knocked down; it's whether you get up."Vince Lombardi


Pats fan since 1993
TealSox is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ATTN: There is no such thing as the Super Bowl's loser "curse" Disco Volante PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 16 01-22-2010 05:30 PM
"All Access" and Preseason Games moving to WBZ PatriotsDaily.com PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 0 01-21-2009 12:00 PM
Shula: "Patriots", "Bonds", and "asterisk" in one sentence! --NY Daily News sam PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum 53 11-06-2007 01:15 PM
OK, I'm moving back towards being "cautiously optimistic" Real World Political Discussion 7 11-29-2006 10:47 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC