Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
ESPN AFC east blogger Tim Graham was asked if the Pats would take a QB day one to provide insurance under Brady and possibly groom for the furture and he said that with the significant drop off in tallent after the big three (Stafford, Sanchez, Freeman) they might have move up and draft a one of the three.Thoughts?
Last edited by TriplecHamp; 04-06-2009 at 10:43 PM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
i take graham's opinions lightly in some cases. the patriots qb situation is one such case.
tim graham insisted all the way up until the cassel trade was announced that there is no way cassel would be traded until after draft because they couldn't be sure of brady's health. i was ok with that being his opinion but he pretty much was insistent cassel would not be traded before the draft.
i think he is not clued in very well to the patriots' thinking regarding the patriots qb situation.
First of all, the talent at the QB position this year is horrible. Stafford is a poor man's Matt Ryan. Sanchez doesn't provide much to ease concerns when you look at the USC QBs that preceded him, e.g. Leinart and John David Booty.
Second, the health of Brady in 2009 should have nothing to do with the need to draft a QB. Even if the Pats did, that QB would have to be an extremely quick learner to warrant him starting over Matt or Kevin, both of whom have experience in the system.
Third, it would probably be cheaper for the Pats to trade some picks for Brady Quinn than move up to the 1st or 3rd or mid-first round for a QB. Quinn would be familiar with the offense and may be disposable to the Browns as they try to deal with having two QBs.
__________________
"It's not whether you get knocked down; it's whether you get up."Vince Lombardi
ESPN AFC east blogger Tim Graham was asked if the Pats would take a QB day one to provide insurance under Brady and possibly groom for the furture and he said that with the significant drop off in tallent after the big three (Stafford, Sanchez, Freeman) they might have move up and draft a one of the three.Thoughts?
Are you sure you read that correctly? I would think he might be talking about, you know, the JEST. . . .
And, BTW, Kevin O'Connell just called. He says "Who asked Bozo?"
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ESPN AFC east blogger Tim Graham was asked if the Pats would take a QB day one to provide insurance under Brady and possibly groom for the furture and he said that with the significant drop off in tallent after the big three (Stafford, Sanchez, Freeman) they might have move up and draft a one of the three.Thoughts?
ESPN reported it so dont worry about it! That wont happen!
I believe Graham in one of his chats admitted to be a phishhead and to living in that humid peninsula down there. For whatever that's worth, I will say it cured me of any interest in reading an ESPN chat.
__________________
"Avert thine eyes! You're not hot enough to be looking at me." To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ESPN AFC east blogger Tim Graham was asked if the Pats would take a QB day one to provide insurance under Brady and possibly groom for the furture and he said that with the significant drop off in tallent after the big three (Stafford, Sanchez, Freeman) they might have move up and draft a one of the three.Thoughts?
Actually, I listened carefully to what he said. He prefaced it by saying that "It's a good move, in theory."
The problem as he sees it, is that there really aren't any "good QBs" that are likely to be available in the second round, so IF the Pats want a day one QB, they'd likely to have to move up to grab one of those three.
That said, I still think he's full of it if he thinks that's going to happen: after drafting O'Connell last year, taking a QB in the first round this year makes no sense at all.
[On a related note, a few weeks ago, DraftTek.com had the Pats taking Josh Freeman at #58. When I e-mailed them about it, the guy who handles the Patriots said that "he represented too much value to pass up"—to which I pointed out "value relative to what?"]
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Actually, I listened carefully to what he said. He prefaced it by saying that "It's a good move, in theory."
The problem as he sees it, is that there really aren't any "good QBs" that are likely to be available in the second round, so IF the Pats want a day one QB, they'd likely to have to move up to grab one of those three.
That said, I still think he's full of it if he thinks that's going to happen: after drafting O'Connell last year, taking a QB in the first round this year makes no sense at all.
[On a related note, a few weeks ago, DraftTek.com had the Pats taking Josh Freeman at #58. When I e-mailed them about it, the guy who handles the Patriots said that "he represented too much value to pass up"—to which I pointed out "value relative to what?"]
AFAIK. I don't expect any FA QBs to sign with the Pats before the draft, though.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.