Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Coulda, Shoulda: Debate past draft decisions here
Quote:
Originally Posted by patchick
Welcome aboard, DRC vs. Mayo!
patchick--you made an excellent point re: DRC/Lofton in your other post.
There is one other thing worth noting, though--such a "desperation" move would run contrary to everything the Patriots have done this decade. You'd have a hard time naming one instance in which the Patriots moved up to grab a player solely to fill a need.
That's because the Patriots never move up for need; rather, they move up for value. Say what you want about the merits of drafting Chad Jackson, nobody expected him to still be on the board in the late 30s, so the Patriots pounced.
__________________
"Momentum was quickly snatched away by New England, who once again proved that any Patriot, at any moment, can make a play." —Inside the NFL, Packers v. Patriots
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: Coulda, Shoulda: Debate past draft decisions here
I'm just going to repost my last comments from the other thread for continuity:
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Riddler
patchick, I understand what you're saying, yet I do think you are including a tad too much in your scenario. This trade value in terms of numbers exceeds what would have been required to jump from 62 to 37, removing Wilhite and including Slater is the more likely scenario, to make that jump up to 37, not Wilhite. So in all fairness it would have been (DRC/Curtis Lofton) vs (Mayo/Wheatley/O'Connell/Slater).
Maybe, it's an unknowable. You can't just look at exactly where a player ended up and calculate the "value chart" after the fact; you have to figure out what your move would have been on draft day if you were desperate to move all the way up from 62 to, say, 30-35. And that's part of the problem: the Pats would have been desperate.
CB was the deepest position in last year's draft, and it's a position where the Pats have historically done very well in rounds 2+. ILB, in contrast, has been the single hardest position on the field for BB to fill -- and they needed an immediate starter. So you can take your ideal ILB target first, then sit back and wait knowing that a lot of CB talent remains. Or you can take your ideal CB first and then plan to give up whatever it takes to get the only remaining ILB option.
Regardless of what I think of DRC (and I liked him a ton), the "choice" of DRC+Lofton would have been a wildly risky draft strategy and cost extra picks, starting with the valuable Mr. O'Connell. So I'm with Mayoclinic on this:
Quote:
Lofton just wasn't going to happen last year. He was obviously going to go late 1st/early 2nd, so with picks at 7 and 63 there was no realistic way that we could get him if we had taken DRC in the 1st round.
Re: Coulda, Shoulda: Debate past draft decisions here
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77
Say what you want about the merits of drafting Chad Jackson, nobody expected him to still be on the board in the late 30s, so the Patriots pounced.
Absolutely, it looked like a steal from a draftnik's perspective. Of course, what we all didn't know at the time was that several teams had taken Jackson off their board because of his attitude problems. So in the "coulda, shoulda" spirit here's my post-mortem on CJ:
I blame Urban Meyer.
The Pats are usually very careful on "attitude" issues, and yet here they moved up to get a guy whom others had flagged as a problem child. Remember that was the first year BB spent a chunk of his vacation with Meyer & the Gators, so I'm assuming that Meyer must have personally vouched for Jackson to allay the Pats' concerns. Plus New England got the invaluable Jeremy Mincey out of the relationship too.
Re: Coulda, Shoulda: Debate past draft decisions here
Could you imagine the Pats without Mayo last year? They lost Thomas, Crable, Woods, Alexander, and Bruschi to injury, they ended the season with Jr, and Colvin coming out of retirement. Mayo was the pick, and the right one. You have to remember that Wheatley was coming on before he got hurt. DRC is a very good player, and I was all for drafting him if they could have moved up (FROM THE 2ND RD) to grab him. But the Pats took the #7 pick in the draft and garnered their starting ILB and ROY plus another pick, you really can't ask for much more than that.
I guess that I'm the only one not ready to throw Wheatley and Whilite to the scrap heap. Like the guys who were calling Merriweather a bust last year at this time. The Pats defense is very complicated, and Wheatly and Whilite will be miles ahead of any CB they draft this year.
The Mayo trade and pick was the right thing last year. Because you have to add the 3rd rounder that the Pats got (Crable). Did you want the Pats to take DRC at 7? or even 10?
__________________
The Jets look like a Super Bowl contender right now about as much as Rosie O’Donnell looks like a threat for the Miss America crown. -NY Post 12/19/2011
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
[+] 19 (19) Carolina Panthers (From Eagles) Otah, Jeff OT 6'6" 340 Pittsburgh
[+] 20 (20) Tampa Bay Buccaneers Talib, Aqib CB 6'1" 202 Kansas
[+] 21 (21) Atlanta Falcons (From Redskins) Baker, Sam OT 6'5" 312 Southern Cal
__________________
The Jets look like a Super Bowl contender right now about as much as Rosie O’Donnell looks like a threat for the Miss America crown. -NY Post 12/19/2011
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: Coulda, Shoulda: Debate past draft decisions here
Quote:
Originally Posted by FreeTedWilliams
Could you imagine the Pats without Mayo last year? They lost Thomas, Crable, Woods, Alexander, and Bruschi to injury, they ended the season with Jr, and Colvin coming out of retirement. Mayo was the pick, and the right one. You have to remember that Wheatley was coming on before he got hurt. DRC is a very good player, and I was all for drafting him if they could have moved up (FROM THE 2ND RD) to grab him. But the Pats took the #7 pick in the draft and garnered their starting ILB and ROY plus another pick, you really can't ask for much more than that.
I guess that I'm the only one not ready to throw Wheatley and Whilite to the scrap heap. Like the guys who were calling Merriweather a bust last year at this time. The Pats defense is very complicated, and Wheatly and Whilite will be miles ahead of any CB they draft this year.
The Mayo trade and pick was the right thing last year. Because you have to add the 3rd rounder that the Pats got (Crable). Did you want the Pats to take DRC at 7? or even 10?
No, I wanted the Pats to draft DRC at #10 after their trade down, then I wanted a trade up in R2 using their existing 2 and a combo of their 3/5 aka, Okie/Slater to jump back up for Lofton.
Again, like I had mentioned, Mayo no question filled a glaring need and was the DROY and will be a stud for a long time in this defense. But I know for a fact that BB loved Cromartie alot, BB flew his scounts down to TSU to personally workout DRC just two days prior to the draft. We had just lost our #1 CB and needed to replace him and DRC, IMO, will end up being a better CB than Asante.
Was Okie a good pick?, yes, I like him alot, but in all honesty, he's probably not going to see the field over the next 4-5 years so his value will more than likely have to wait. Slater, is Slater, nothing special, but we'll give him time. So to me, yes, it's nice having Okie but you want to have guys impacting football games on the field "right now" or in the "very near future" at a time when you have Moss for 2 years and Brady at his peak for what might be 2-3 more years.
Drafting Okie was nice, but how does that help "Today's Team". I believe "Today's team", is better, if you had added a Curtis Lofton and Dominque Rodgers-Cromartie in place of the Mayo/Wheatley combo. Is Mayo better than Lofton, he is, but I think the difference between DRC and Wheatley exceeds the Mayo/Lofton difference. Lofton had a tremendous rookie season for Atlanta. Again, hear me out. I love Mayo, I am just giving my opinion on the "What IF" scenario and pair that I feel would have made the Patriots a better defense, especially in 2009.
Last edited by The_Riddler; 01-19-2009 at 08:45 AM..
Re: Coulda, Shoulda: Debate past draft decisions here
Quote:
Originally Posted by FreeTedWilliams
But the Pats took the #7 pick in the draft and garnered their starting ILB and ROY plus another pick, you really can't ask for much more than that.
That's what it really comes down to: Mayo was a terrific pick. It's hard to argue with drafting the unanimous* ROY at a critical position that was a desperate need. Were there other terrific players available too? Sure, but you can't draft them all.
Re: Coulda, Shoulda: Debate past draft decisions here
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Riddler
No, I wanted the Pats to draft DRC at #10 after their trade down, then I wanted a trade up in R2 using their existing 2 and a combo of their 3/5 aka, Okie/Slater to jump back up for Lofton.
OK...so suppose that hadn't worked. Clearly you can't count on moving up 30 spots in Round 2 before somebody else takes that one player you're banking on. What was your backup plan at ILB?
Re: Coulda, Shoulda: Debate past draft decisions here
Quote:
Originally Posted by patchick
That's what it really comes down to: Mayo was a terrific pick. It's hard to argue with drafting the unanimous* ROY at a critical position that was a desperate need. Were there other terrific players available too? Sure, but you can't draft them all.
Almost unanimous. There was one vote for Rivers. Anyways I didn't think Rivers was a fit for our D. Mayo was the best choice and we got him later. Hindsight is 20/20.
DRC looks like he is on the way to being a great CB, but we don't know what we have in Wheatley yet, and Wilhite has looked decent.
__________________
Pats NEW LOOK Offense
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Weapons Galore!
Last edited by VJCPatriot; 01-19-2009 at 08:53 AM..