Newest Religion: Gun Control - Page 6 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree16Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-24-2013, 11:32 PM   #51
In the Starting Line-up
 
Titus Pullo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,566
Default Re: Newest Religion: Gun Control

... killing from a nice safe distance with the flick of a finger seems cowardly ... just sayin.

Any fat redneck can take a life that way. What would the knights of the round table think of us today?
__________________
"America's most dangerous enemies are not Islamic radicals, but those who sold us the perverted ideology of free market capitalism and globalization... they have dynamited the foundations of our society."
- Chris Hedges
Titus Pullo is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 01-24-2013, 11:35 PM   #52
All Pro Poster
 
PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,668
My Mood: Angelic
Default Re: Newest Religion: Gun Control

Screw that.... what would the Knights Templar say?

Everything has something to do with the Templars...
PatsFanInVa is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013, 11:57 PM   #53
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,979
Default Re: Newest Religion: Gun Control

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunnails View Post
==================================================

RIPF,

I believe your link is inaccurate in that it is my understanding that the minimum barrel length for a rifle is 16" with an overall length of 26", of course the minimum barrel length for a shotgun is 18" with a minimum overall length of 28".

I state this because I have a shotgun that I cut the barrel length down to 18 1/2" and before I did so I looked into extensively.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pardon my vanity, but perhaps the board would be interested in my shotgun project, and perhaps this may show some a glimpse into the "gun culture".

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My older sister had come to me asking advice about getting a weapon for home defense, and I had this 20 gauge that I didn't use mainly because I have a 12 gauge and since the Feds outlawed lead shot for hunting and such, and steel shot just doesn't cut it in a 20 gauge and because I had basically ruined its resale value due to cutting the stock, and the wife and I do not hunt or trap shoot any more.
I originally planed on gifting it to my sister, but it turned out so nice I decided to keep it, and I bought her a youth sized Remington 870 in 20 gauge.

The following are excerpts from a thread I created about this project at Nortwestfirearms.com a site mostly devoted to 2nd amendment issues I joined about 5 years back.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2/8/12
I have this Springfield 67F 20 gauge with a 28" barrel gathering dust in my safe.


I cut down the stock on it about 2" eight years ago so my wife could shoot trap with it, and she did quite well with it after I cut on it. So I know it is a good shooter and reliable due to past experience. Still the 67F has a bad rep from what I could Google.

Google turned up some cool info when I was searching for a 18 1/2" barrel for it, one there is no 18 1/2" barrels available, and also that some or working there 67Fs to resemble a 77E which apparently is a Viet Nam era military shot gun.


Stole this image from some guy called street sweeper

So I am thinking I will turn my $100 shot gun in to a $225 gun.
Edit text.
I go on to ask some forum members some advice

So I did it. The goal was to make my circa 1990 Springfield 67f 20 gauge look like a Viet Nam era military Stevens 77E, So I ordered a Viet Nam era butt stock complete with the red T style recoil pad from Sarco ($30 after including shipping), an era correct cotton sling ($7), and some swivels ($12), I still need a bead sight.

I stripped the fore grip and had trouble getting the stain to match the stock, I was ready to try soaking it in dirty motor oil till I spied my black shoe polish, that did the trick.

I decided to cut the barrel to 18 1/2" even though the correct length would be 20" for a Viet Nam era shotty, which I am fine with because it is a 20 gauge and isn't a Viet Nam shot gun, just a wanna be.

First ever gun project results. Must say I am happy with it.





I will add that with the run on guns and the demand for anything that looks military or is useful
for self defense I now place a current value on this gun of $350.


The link is to the ATF website so I doubt that it's incorrect. Remember that there have been revisions to the 1934 law as well as Supreme Court decisions that have affected it as well.

The point of my post wasn't about "size" (isn't it always that way with guys) it was about automatic weapons and their availability. I know that information is accurate.
Gunnails likes this.
RI Patriots fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 12:00 AM   #54
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,979
Default Re: Newest Religion: Gun Control

Quote:
Originally Posted by Titus Pullo View Post
... killing from a nice safe distance with the flick of a finger seems cowardly ... just sayin.

Any fat redneck can take a life that way. What would the knights of the round table think of us today?

They'd think..."wow, what is that gun device and can I trade it for my bow and arrow?"
RI Patriots fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 01:28 AM   #55
In the Starting Line-up
 
Gunnails's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 2,570
Blog Entries: 1
Default Re: Newest Religion: Gun Control

Quote:
Originally Posted by RI Patriots fan View Post
The link is to the ATF website so I doubt that it's incorrect. Remember that there have been revisions to the 1934 law as well as Supreme Court decisions that have affected it as well.

The point of my post wasn't about "size" (isn't it always that way with guys) it was about automatic weapons and their availability. I know that information is accurate.
===============================================

LOL,


I don't mean to pick a way at things, but the devil is in the details, I can't find any thing on the ATF other then what you posted that says the minimum length for a rifle barrel is 18".

Lots of stuff about a short barrel rifles being under 16". I suppose it doesn't matter, but I still think I am correct. Was 18" in 1934 changed to 16" in 1960 to allow import of different rifles. Geez, now I have to find a cite.

Found it.

http://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/nati...art-registered

Q: What is the registered part of a Short Barreled Rifle (SBR) or Short Barreled Shotgun (SBS)?
While a receiver alone may be classified as a “firearm” under the Gun Control Act (GCA), SBRs and SBSs are classified in totality under the National Firearms Act (NFA). A firearm that meets the definition of a SBR consists of a rifle that has a barrel less than 16 inches in length. A SBS consists of a shotgun that has a barrel less than 18 inches in length. The serialized receiver is recorded for registration in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record (NFRTR).
Gunnails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 06:03 AM   #56
All Pro Poster
 
PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,668
My Mood: Angelic
Default Re: Newest Religion: Gun Control

In the 1934 act, "machineguns" are in fact specifically and separately identified, not just referred to as "one of the kinds of weapons of a certain size," and are banned unless you have a special permit from Treasury.

GunCite - Gun Control: Machine Guns

Quote:
It has been unlawful since 1934 (The National Firearms Act) for civilians to own machine guns without special permission from the U.S. Treasury Department.
I found the text below online, but while labeled the NFA34, appears to be the patched up version of the act from the 80s (I believe the NFA of 34 ran into legal challenges, and had to be replaced by subsequent laws based on it, and that the original effective ban on privately held machine guns, except by special permit by Treasury, stayed in effect in all of them).

The National Firearms Act of 1934

S179.105 Transfer and Possession of Machineguns

(a) General. As provided by 26 U.S.C. 5812 and 26 U.S.C. 5822, an application to make or transfer a firearm shall be denied if the making, transfer, receipt, or possession of the firearm would place the maker or transferee in violation of law. Section 922(o), Title 18, U.S.C., makes it unlawful for any person to transfer or possess a machine gun, except a transfer to or by, or possession by or under the authority of, the United States or any department or agency thereof or a State, or a department, agency, or political subdivision thereof; or any lawful transfer or lawful possession of a machinegun that was lawfully possessed before May 19, 1986. Therefore, notwithstanding any other provision of this part, no application to make, transfer, or import a machinegun will be approved except as provided by this section.

Etc... i.e., the section is specific to and restrictive of machine guns.

Also from the ATF in FAQs on the NFA of 1934:

Quote:
While the NFA was enacted by Congress as an exercise of its authority to tax, the NFA had an underlying purpose unrelated to revenue collection. As the legislative history of the law discloses, its underlying purpose was to curtail, if not prohibit, transactions in NFA firearms. Congress found these firearms to pose a significant crime problem because of their frequent use in crime, particularly the gangland crimes of that era such as the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre. The $200 making and transfer taxes on most NFA firearms were considered quite severe and adequate to carry out Congress’ purpose to discourage or eliminate transactions in these firearms. The $200 tax has not changed since 1934.
Evidently you've read that as meaning that all the NFA did was impose the $200 tax. In the law as I could find it online, that is not the case.

PFnV
PatsFanInVa is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 06:04 AM   #57
All Pro Poster
 
PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,668
My Mood: Angelic
Default Re: Newest Religion: Gun Control

By the way, if a case-by-case permit by Treasury is not a ban, I don't think there's much of an argument. We can just extend the machine-gun non-ban to semi-autos or, for that matter, handguns in general, and you'd have no objection. Do I read you right, comrade?

PFnV
PatsFanInVa is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 06:47 AM   #58
Hall of Fame Poster
 
PatriotsReign's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 22,665
Default Re: Newest Religion: Gun Control

Quote:
Originally Posted by Titus Pullo View Post

Any fat redneck can take a life that way. What would the knights of the round table think of us today?
Or any apartment-dwelling, inner-city gang-banger for that matter. I wonder which group actually kills more people compared to their share of population?

BTW...the term redneck shouldn't be used from what I've been told.
__________________
"No one walking this earth knows what is truly righteous"
PatriotsReign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 06:49 AM   #59
Hall of Fame Poster
 
PatriotsReign's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 22,665
Default Re: Newest Religion: Gun Control

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInVa View Post
Screw that.... what would the Knights Templar say?

Everything has something to do with the Templars...
If I could join that group, I'd do it in a heart-beat. Where do I go to sign up?
__________________
"No one walking this earth knows what is truly righteous"
PatriotsReign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 08:49 AM   #60
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,637
Default Re: Newest Religion: Gun Control

Quote:
Originally Posted by Titus Pullo View Post
... killing from a nice safe distance with the flick of a finger seems cowardly ... just sayin.

Any fat redneck can take a life that way. What would the knights of the round table think of us today?
Are you talking about Obama's love of drones? Now, Obama is an angry, old white man, but I would not call him a redneck, and he is far from fat.
Hamar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Using Religion Harry Boy Political Discussion 14 08-05-2011 05:12 PM
Religion Again Harry Boy Political Discussion 11 07-24-2010 09:12 PM
Religion Harry Boy Political Discussion 0 05-23-2009 10:50 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC