We MUST Keep The Mortgage Interest Deduction - Page 4 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree24Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-28-2012, 08:58 AM   #31
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
DarrylS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a very special place
Posts: 36,134
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Re: We MUST Keep The Mortgage Interest Deduction

Regressive tax or not, the problem with income taxes is that it favors the wealthy.. there are whole professions who make a living off of finding loopholes to avoid paying taxes...

Have worked for people, when we had the cleaning business, who would refer to their enclave on the water as their income tax deduction..

Never mind the huge federal bureaucracy to enforce the regulations.. it could be done simpler and more efficiently.

The challenge for many is avoidance, while many in the middle and lower just pay begrudgingly..
likes this.
__________________
"Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
DarrylS is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 11-28-2012, 09:36 AM   #32
All Pro Poster
 
PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,627
My Mood: Angelic
Default Re: We MUST Keep The Mortgage Interest Deduction

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrylS View Post
Regressive tax or not, the problem with income taxes is that it favors the wealthy.. there are whole professions who make a living off of finding loopholes to avoid paying taxes...

Have worked for people, when we had the cleaning business, who would refer to their enclave on the water as their income tax deduction..

Never mind the huge federal bureaucracy to enforce the regulations.. it could be done simpler and more efficiently.

The challenge for many is avoidance, while many in the middle and lower just pay begrudgingly..
Yeah but look at the numbers above... sales taxes work that way. Same would be true of a flat tax.

You're looking at a system that ends up with RMoney paying an effective rate of 13% in a good year. I have no doubt he had years where he paid 10% or 5%... but he didn't pay .1% (Except maybe 2009, a likely zero liability year for RMoney.)

Think about it for a minute -- that's what "regressive" or "progressive" means in a tax system.

Saying "I hate the present system because with income tax the wealthy get away with murder" is all well and good, but by extension of the metaphor, the wealthy will get away with mass murder in the flat tax/national sales tax alternative.

Just calculate the tax burden of an extremely high earner using the sales tax or flat tax, versus using the present system, to confirm this for yourself.

The solution they use to make the math work for these things itself should tip you off: "We have to broaden the base." Well let's see. They're not going to broaden it to other wealthy people, by and large. Who's that leave?

PFnV
PatsFanInVa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 09:49 AM   #33
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
DarrylS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a very special place
Posts: 36,134
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Re: We MUST Keep The Mortgage Interest Deduction

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInVa View Post
Yeah but look at the numbers above... sales taxes work that way. Same would be true of a flat tax.

You're looking at a system that ends up with RMoney paying an effective rate of 13% in a good year. I have no doubt he had years where he paid 10% or 5%... but he didn't pay .1% (Except maybe 2009, a likely zero liability year for RMoney.)

Think about it for a minute -- that's what "regressive" or "progressive" means in a tax system.

Saying "I hate the present system because with income tax the wealthy get away with murder" is all well and good, but by extension of the metaphor, the wealthy will get away with mass murder in the flat tax/national sales tax alternative.

Just calculate the tax burden of an extremely high earner using the sales tax or flat tax, versus using the present system, to confirm this for yourself.

The solution they use to make the math work for these things itself should tip you off: "We have to broaden the base." Well let's see. They're not going to broaden it to other wealthy people, by and large. Who's that leave?

PFnV
Not having the economic background, will leave this discussion for those who have a better handle than I..

There are other forays that I am better versed in.. au revoir.
__________________
"Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
DarrylS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 09:53 AM   #34
All Pro Poster
 
PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,627
My Mood: Angelic
Default Re: We MUST Keep The Mortgage Interest Deduction

Quote:
Originally Posted by wistahpatsfan View Post
Because taxing the money that a roofer or firefighter makes makes risking his life, enduring stress, losing his grip on relationships and sanity, bleeding, breaking bones, and destroying his back by the time he's 50 is obscene to me.

Taking a part of the pay from a waitress who can barely walk by the end of the week while taking insults sexual advances from her customers is obscene.

Taking a piece of the pay from a landscaper who are forced to inhale toxic chemicals, shovel mulch and build stone walls and patios with his bare, broken hands is obscene.

Taking part of the pay from a nurse, who works harder and does more to help the sick and dying than any doctor who is making 100 times what she does and gets to shelter and write off most of it is obscene.

It's not about the bottom line, for me. I'm an idealist, and pragmatism, to me, means not insulting people and doing right by those who work hard on our behalf.

The income tax is obscene and offensive to me.
You're still taking X% more from a firefighter who is breaking bones, stressing out, bleeding, burning, asphyxiating, and otherwise having an unpleasant go of it whenever he goes to the store or out to dinner. And, you're taking more of it because the math gives the edge to the plutocrat who makes his money by watching his money make money.

Because of how much gets taken from the different income layers, until we have million-dollar-a-year firefighters, the firefighter will always get screwed in a national sales tax scenario compared with a plutocrat.

What you're pointing toward is that a waitress, a roofer, a firefighter, a regular middle class person... has more burden than he or she should. That's the obscene part.

You don't cure that obscenity by making it worse.

The visceral reaction specifically to income tax, versus some other kind of tax that would be better for the very rich and worse for the people you mention, just doesn't hold water... it's a giveaway from those very hardworking people you just mentioned to the people who don't work.

I agree with your gut reaction point: Regular people need a break.

But I disagree that we should do things that cosmetically look like they give regular people a break when they just make things worse.

But one other point I guess of agreement... OT, tax policy aside... if we could stop just for ten seconds from simply being buttholes to each other, at least people could go about their lives feeling like they have to fight less to maintain basic dignity.

We all know the righties that are still trying to make hay from a very real phenomenon in the 60s or 70s.

People came home from war, and got blamed for the policies that sent them to war. The U.S. Army set up free-fire zones. Then you pulled the trigger. Then the person you freely fired on turned out to be a 6-year old -- or, you didn't, but somebody did.

Then you come home to derision for serving your country.

Well, that was wrong. It's not happening anymore. It's common for people of every political persuasion to tell people coming home "thank you." No matter if you agree with the war, we're all aware you have to value the vet. They do what they do for all of us, whether you disagree with present policy or not.

Why can't we think that way about everyday people who break their bodies to make cars, get dinner out to the fourtop at table 3, put out the fires, do the EMT work for people who are hurt, do whatever they do to keep our lives running "as we assume they should"?

I don't mean never complain if service is bad, I just mean assume that people who do things for you are serving you, just as you serve them when you do what you do?

Random thought. Seems like we feel like we're all trying to grind down whoever we get a chance to. It might have the equivalent value of a sizable raise, in terms of wellbeing, if people were just not habitual buttholes to each other.

/rant

PFnV
PatsFanInVa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 12:41 PM   #35
Hall of Fame Poster
 
PatriotsReign's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 22,630
Default Re: We MUST Keep The Mortgage Interest Deduction

I look at all tax increases as DECREASES in my income.

I'd assume most look at it the same way.
PatriotsReign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 02:02 PM   #36
All Pro Poster
 
PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,627
My Mood: Angelic
Default Re: We MUST Keep The Mortgage Interest Deduction

Okay let's never pay off the debt! Ta-daaaa!
PatsFanInVa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 02:40 PM   #37
Hall of Fame Poster
 
PatriotsReign's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 22,630
Default Re: We MUST Keep The Mortgage Interest Deduction

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInVa View Post
Okay let's never pay off the debt! Ta-daaaa!
It's like magic!

So you agree that all tax increases are also decreases in income. In addition, they are decreases in discretionary/disposable income.

So people will save less, buy less or both.

Last edited by PatriotsReign; 11-28-2012 at 02:42 PM..
PatriotsReign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 03:04 PM   #38
All Pro Poster
 
PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,627
My Mood: Angelic
Default Re: We MUST Keep The Mortgage Interest Deduction

In the same sense that every tax reduction is a giveaway, yes -- and in the same sense that publicly financed income enhancement being discontinued is not a "tax increase." For example, if you give people "temporary" money every year starting in 2003, it's not "raising their taxes" to allow the sunset provision to kick in.

However, the state of our economy at present argues strongly that middle class tax cuts should be allowed to continue. If we, as a nation, can afford it, I would not be against those rates being permanent.

For the rich? There's no reason they ever got the cut in the first place. Stop the giveaways.

PFnV
PatsFanInVa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 03:31 PM   #39
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
 

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,939
Default Re: We MUST Keep The Mortgage Interest Deduction

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInVa View Post
In the same sense that every tax reduction is a giveaway, yes -- and in the same sense that publicly financed income enhancement being discontinued is not a "tax increase." For example, if you give people "temporary" money every year starting in 2003, it's not "raising their taxes" to allow the sunset provision to kick in.

However, the state of our economy at present argues strongly that middle class tax cuts should be allowed to continue. If we, as a nation, can afford it, I would not be against those rates being permanent.

For the rich? There's no reason they ever got the cut in the first place. Stop the giveaways.
PFnV


Stop giving them their own money back.....causes its the people's money!
RI Patriots fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 03:36 PM   #40
Hall of Fame Poster
 
PatriotsReign's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 22,630
Default Re: We MUST Keep The Mortgage Interest Deduction

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInVa View Post
In the same sense that every tax reduction is a giveaway, yes -- and in the same sense that publicly financed income enhancement being discontinued is not a "tax increase." For example, if you give people "temporary" money every year starting in 2003, it's not "raising their taxes" to allow the sunset provision to kick in.

However, the state of our economy at present argues strongly that middle class tax cuts should be allowed to continue. If we, as a nation, can afford it, I would not be against those rates being permanent.

For the rich? There's no reason they ever got the cut in the first place. Stop the giveaways.

PFnV
PFiVA....serious point here, ok?

Have you ever considered WHY our gov't has been cutting taxes for the past 15-20 years? I know you're wicked smaht, so I assume you realize it was all to generate economic growth.

Why?

Gotta tip my hat to Titus Pullo here and say that it was because our politicians (and "them" and "they") knew growth was in decline. It was all one big bubble after another. Think about all the tax cuts, gov't subisidies and changes in laws that fed that beast!

And the biggest of them all....the king of all of them was the "making homes affordable" to everyone scheme.

And I do believe they knew exactly what "they" were doing every step of the way. And then the house of cards fell all at once....and here we are all "feh'd up".

Which is exactly why Bernanke's QE bullsheeit upsets me to no end. Because in the end, we'll end up at the same point whether we try to prop things up ad infinitum or not. I don't believe we need to bridge our economy to the next boom cycle because I don't believe there will another boom cycle. At least not the kind we all remember.

And that brings me to the point of why I am constantly saying I want our gov't to tell us the truth....and I mean ALL of it. And yes, I can handle the truth...I believe we all can.

No more smoke & mirrors...no more bridges to no where and no more pyramid schemes that need constant influx of fiat money.

It's time to deal with reality on it's own terms.
PatriotsReign is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Forgivable" $50,000 no interest loans: Feds offer mortgage help to unemployed Real World Political Discussion 14 07-08-2011 11:24 AM
Getting a mortgage atomdomb Political Discussion 32 05-03-2010 04:36 PM
Fed To Take Over Mortgage Giants scout Political Discussion 37 09-06-2008 08:17 AM
Bush's Secretary Leavitt uses phony foundation for tax deduction mikey Political Discussion 0 07-21-2006 07:09 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563