Watch Greta tonight. More devastating news on Libya - New England Patriots Forums

Patradomous · 11-01-2012, 06:35 PM

Documents found in Benghazi consulate claimed “troubling” surveillance by Libyan guards; Update: Obama not participating in investigation; Report: State never requested military back-up during attack « Hot Air

Quote:

“The State Department is responsible for assessing security at its diplomatic installations and for requesting support from other government agencies if they need it,” a senior U.S. Defense official said. “There was no request from the Department of State to intervene militarily on the night of the attack.”

The president, however, would have the final say as to whether or not to send in the military.

The MSM is also starting to report and ask questions on this story.

Obama and Hillary are complete liars on this story.

Watch Greta on FOX at 10 pm she has all the newest stuff and unpacks quite nicley.

Holy Diver · 11-01-2012, 07:02 PM

so...let me get this straight....

Obama wanted Al Qaeda to murder his ambassidor.

why would he do that? What did they administration gain by either allowing this to happen, or give the stand down orders?

I just want to understand the inference here, what does he and Hillary have to gain from this? What is the end game?

Are we invading Libya?

(PS - There is a better chance of me voting for Romney than watching "Greta" tonight)

***Tunescribe*** · 11-01-2012, 07:11 PM

Greta is the only ugly person I've seen made uglier by plastic surgery. Impossible to look at, let alone listen to. She had a modicum of credibility before joining Fox, now zero.

Boston Boxer · 11-01-2012, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Holy Diver

so...let me get this straight....

Obama wanted Al Qaeda to murder his ambassidor.

why would he do that? What did they administration gain by either allowing this to happen, or give the stand down orders?

I just want to understand the inference here, what does he and Hillary have to gain from this? What is the end game?

Are we invading Libya?

(PS - There is a better chance of me voting for Romney than watching "Greta" tonight)

why would he do that you ask??? he wouldn't. This is the last ditch effort of the Republicans to steal the WH. It is not going to work...they will lose and have to go back and drag feet in congress and pout for another 4 years.

DJango · 11-01-2012, 08:53 PM

One thing is for sure. The movie that Obama lied about to the UN and everybody else was a complete fabrication.

alvinnf · 11-01-2012, 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Holy Diver

so...let me get this straight....

Obama wanted Al Qaeda to murder his ambassidor.

why would he do that? What did they administration gain by either allowing this to happen, or give the stand down orders?

I just want to understand the inference here, what does he and Hillary have to gain from this? What is the end game?

Are we invading Libya?

(PS - There is a better chance of me voting for Romney than watching "Greta" tonight)

an ambassador is a four star asset, he is to be protected as so. It's natural for people to question flaws in the process of protecting that asset. The military takes these things very seriously. Personally I hate the timing of this thing, I wish the politics were'nt in the way. Had this same event happened in the summer I would like to think they would have acted differently, getting a different result. But, unfortunately for those who lost their lives, it did'nt happen in the summer away from the glare of elections. Now, people want answers, they won't get them till after the election, but they deserve answers.

PatriotsReign · 11-01-2012, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJango

One thing is for sure. The movie that Obama lied about to the UN and everybody else was a complete fabrication.

What everyone should be asking themselves is that "Why was the movie ever brought up?"

it wasn't relevant to anything that happened in Libya that night. So since we all now know it wasn't relevant, one doesn't have to be a genius to realize it was a cover up and a distraction.

But for what?

***DarrylS*** · 11-02-2012, 05:38 AM

As I thought all along, this was a CIA outpost disguised as a Consulate... more "factual" information, that will not be reported on Fox News..

The real reason that Bishop Willard has been silent on this is because he now receives the daily security briefings and knows the real story.. as does Issa, but he prefers to grandstand.

New Detailed Account of Benghazi Attack Notes CIA’s Quick Response - ABC News

Quote:

Intelligence officials have disclosed a new detailed timeline of the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, acknowledging the CIA played a greater role in responding to the attack than has previously been disclosed. A senior U.S. intelligence official also insisted that the CIA security team that initially responded to the attack was not given orders “to stand down in providing support,” as had been suggested in media reports.

The official says there was “no second guessing” of those on the ground in Libya by senior officials either in Libya or Washington.

According to the official, upon learning of the attack at the consulate, the security team at the annex responded “as quickly and effectively as possible.” The official described how the security team tried to rally additional support from local Libyan forces and heavier weapons, but that when that could not be accomplished “within minutes” they moved out to the compound. The official called the security team “genuine heroes” who risked their lives to save those at the compound.

Patradomous · 11-02-2012, 05:54 AM

Report: Obama never convened counterterrorism task force during Benghazi attack « Hot Air

Quote:

Report: Obama never convened counterterrorism task force during Benghazi attack

Quote:

Counterterrorism sources and internal emails reviewed by CBS News express frustration that key responders were ready to deploy, but were not called upon to help in the attack…

PatsWSB47 · 11-02-2012, 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarrylS

As I thought all along, this was a CIA outpost disguised as a Consulate... more "factual" information, that will not be reported on Fox News..

The real reason that Bishop Willard has been silent on this is because he now receives the daily security briefings and knows the real story.. as does Issa, but he prefers to grandstand.

New Detailed Account of Benghazi Attack Notes CIA’s Quick Response - ABC News

First the real story was it was a movie

Then the real story was it was Clinton

Then the real story was that Obama proved he knew it wasn't a spontaneous uprising because he used the word terror describing the attack

Then the real story was that he knew nothing because he hadn't been told for a couple of weeks.

Now the real story is was the CIA.

If Romney as a candidate has been silent because he knew the real story, the why didn't Obama as the president know the real story?

It's clear Obama's movie excuse fabrication is part of the cover-up. The movie, then Clinton, then the CIA ware all to blame. This smells to high heaven.

I don't believe for a minute Obama was left in the dark all that time. It's clear to me the event is an embarrassment and he hope he could kick it down the road long enough to save face in the run u to the election.