ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
In the future, would you please respond to my statements instead of attacking me personally? You know, new rules and all. TIA.
Your definition of the word "attack" is incorrect. Scholars would define my post as a critique. Even non-scholars would do so, and those who would become scholars, and most schools in general. Even groups of fish would...
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
According to Mitt, federal disaster relief is simply IMMORAL. Sugar coat it, deflect the statement all you want, but the fact remains that Mitt is a cold-hearted, grade a poop-shooter. He is willing to attempt to score political points on future deficits, which EVERY president except Clinton over the last bunch has contributed to, before the well being, andf rebuilding efforts of everyday americans affected by a natural disaster.
Wow. What was that you were saying about hyperbole? I have no problem with someone saying that emergency relief is better delivered at the state, and not the federal, level.
Here's a question I know you won't answer: Are you really comfortable with the administration that handled Katrina and the Gulf Oil Spill being in charge of this situation?
Your definition of the word "attack" is incorrect. Scholars would define my post as a critique. Even non-scholars would do so, and those who would become scholars, and most schools in general. Even groups of fish would...
Hey, you're preaching to the choir my friend. But I make neither the rules nor the definitions.
Wow. What was that you were saying about hyperbole? I have no problem with someone saying that emergency relief is better delivered at the state, and not the federal, level.
Here's a question I know you won't answer: Are you really comfortable with the administration that handled Katrina and the Gulf Oil Spill being in charge of this situation?
you really need to understand definitions. Its not hyberbolic for me to coment on a quote, thats called commentary. The statement that you made about a BUS being 10 times more effective at disaster relief that FEMA is the very definition of hyperbole.
And I think you might wanna RE-think the question you are asking. The same administration handled Katrina and the oils spill? in what universe?
That aint hyberbole, just confusion.
(insert Baio)
.
Last edited by Holy Diver; 10-29-2012 at 03:56 PM..
you really need to understand definitions. Its not hyberbolic for me to coment on a quote, thats called commentary. The statement that you made about a BUS being 10 times more effective at disaster relief that FEMA is the very definition of hyperbole.
Ah, I didn't realize that you intended the phrase "Mitt is a cold-hearted, grade a poop-shooter." to be insightful commentary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holy Diver
And I think you might wanna RE-think the question you are asking. The same administration handled Katrina and the oils spill? in what universe?
I was referring to FEMA; I didn't mean the same presidential administration. I apologize for my poor choice of words, but that's what I meant. It simply came out wrong.
So, to rephrase the question, are your comfortable with FEMA coordinating relief for affected areas? Do you have confidence in their ability to do a good job during the coming weeks?
No Need to worry...Mitt has just released a statemnt contradicting what he said:
Quote:
“As the first responders, states are in the best position to aid affected individuals and communities, and to direct resources and assistance to where they are needed most. This includes help from the federal government and FEMA.”
So...its a STATE thing, that will redistribute the FEDERAL resources...
According to Mitt, federal disaster relief is simply IMMORAL. Sugar coat it, deflect the statement all you want, but the fact remains that Mitt is a cold-hearted, grade a poop-shooter. He is willing to attempt to score political points on future deficits, which EVERY president except Clinton over the last bunch has contributed to, before the well being, andf rebuilding efforts of everyday americans affected by a natural disaster.
Today...Mitt is sending those 50 million people a bus...
F-yourself Mr Romney!
__________________ “ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.
__________________ “ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.
Last edited by IllegalContact; 10-29-2012 at 04:09 PM..
Ah, I didn't realize that you intended the phrase "Mitt is a cold-hearted, grade a poop-shooter." to be insightful commentary.
I was referring to FEMA; I didn't mean the same presidential administration. I apologize for my poor choice of words, but that's what I meant. It simply came out wrong.
So, to rephrase the question, are your comfortable with FEMA coordinating relief for affected areas? Do you have confidence in their ability to do a good job during the coming weeks?
YES. as long as the guy in charge of FEMAs last job wasnt being a horse judge, yeah I'm cool with FEMA handeling a disaster.
I'm sure FEMA has a bit more resources and boots on the ground than all the power in Mitt's Magic Bus.
4Likes
Re: Words That May Haunt the Romney Campaign
Linear Mode
