TyronePoole

is this supposed to be a criticism lol

I usually take 75% investments how about u

Wolfpack

It's nothing more than pointing out the silliness of someone who claims they don't make boa(Please be quiet - edited)l predictions about who is going to win an election in the exact same thread where they challenged anyone and everyone to an up-to-$1,000 bet on the outcome of Obama-Romney.
Uh, ok.

TyronePoole

you should probably not bother continuing

Wolfpack

I probably won't. I've spoken my piece, pointed out your inconsistencies, and really have nothing more to add.

BTW, did you finally figure out what I meant when I said how offshore odds for wagering on Romney are better than a straight up bet, or is that something you're still having trouble with?

TyronePoole

your nose for profit is almost as impressive as your sarcasm detector

Wolfpack

Why do you say that? All I've said that if I wanted to place a bet on something - no matter what that thing is and no matter how certain I am of winning - I will always always ALWAYS place the bet with the best odds, best payout, etc. The fact that you disagree with that statement makes it clear you don't really have a solid grasp of money management.

Now please feel free to have the last word which it is clear you are dead set on having. Don't worry, I won't even bother reading it.

TyronePoole

I don't get your point. You criticized me as being bold for trying to get good odds on the election v. the betting market. Seems weird/dumb

Hamar

You are kidding yourself if you think any of those scenarios represent a win of any kind.

IcyPatriot

Both of the guys running are winners ... not the good kind. We will lose ... we always do but it is still a great country ... can't complain.

Hamar

I agree, and since I do not have kids and I am comfortable where I am in life none of this will change my life in any way.

If I had kids I would feel pretty bad right about now