Romney's rate Really Around 30% due to double Taxation. - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-21-2012, 04:52 PM   #1
----> Iron Mod <----
 
IcyPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 31,494
Default Romney's rate Really Around 30% due to double Taxation.

The left is not going to be happy ... and what of the tax threads already here ... if true will some apologize and stand corrected ... let the blood letting begin.

Mitt Romney Paid 30%, Not 13% In Federal Income Taxes - Forbes

Quote:
The Romneys also reported $4.9 million in ordinary dividends, of which $3.3 million qualified for the 15% tax rate. Unlike interest payments, corporations may not deduct dividends from their income. Dividend income therefore is taxed twice, first at the corporate level, and then again when it is reported on an individual’s personal income tax return.

A precise calculation of this double tax is impossible to make because the tax rates paid by different corporations vary widely – from 0% by GE and General Motors to the top corporate tax rate of 35%. A rigorous economic analysis would use the top marginal tax rate because that is the rate that affects economic decisions. However, for the purpose of this analysis, a reasonable estimate would use the average U.S. corporate tax rate which, over longer periods of time, has been 25%.
IcyPatriot is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 08-21-2012, 04:57 PM   #2
In the Starting Line-up
 
KDPPatsfan85's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Trumbull, CT
Posts: 2,104
My Mood: Stressed
Default Re: Romney's rate Really Around 30% due to double Taxation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IcyPatriot View Post
The left is not going to be happy ... and what of the tax threads already here ... if true will some apologize and stand corrected ... let the blood letting begin.

Mitt Romney Paid 30%, Not 13% In Federal Income Taxes - Forbes
Liberals: "Forbes is a right wing website. Romney didn't pay taxes for 10 years. BLAH BLAH BLAH"
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
KDPPatsfan85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 05:43 PM   #3
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,092
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Romney's rate Really Around 30% due to double Taxation.

The point about double taxation is correct.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
patsfan13 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 08:11 PM   #4
All Pro Poster
 

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 11,056
Default Re: Romney's rate Really Around 30% due to double Taxation.

It is not "correct," it is a possibility -- an estimate based on assumptions that could well be wrong. A reasonable argument would be that the tax rate paid by Bain investments would have been below the average corporate rate because Bain, like most private equity firms, would have structured its deals to reduce taxes and to avoid double taxation as much as possible -- something that is easier for private companies with fewer shareholders than it is for public companies.

There certainly was double taxation, but the magnitude could have been very low -- easily could have been single digits rather than 25%
chicowalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 09:13 PM   #5
----> Iron Mod <----
 
IcyPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 31,494
Default Re: Romney's rate Really Around 30% due to double Taxation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chicowalker View Post
It is not "correct," it is a possibility -- an estimate based on assumptions that could well be wrong. A reasonable argument would be that the tax rate paid by Bain investments would have been below the average corporate rate because Bain, like most private equity firms, would have structured its deals to reduce taxes and to avoid double taxation as much as possible -- something that is easier for private companies with fewer shareholders than it is for public companies.

There certainly was double taxation, but the magnitude could have been very low -- easily could have been single digits rather than 25%
Chico the point is that 13% is the lowest and go up from there ...
the premise that the guy is a criminal or felon or tax cheat or any of the things Obama has accused him of is wrong. Now if one wants to say he should have paid more ... well fine ... that's another topic. But the guy is not a tax cheat.
IcyPatriot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 09:58 PM   #6
All Pro Poster
 

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 11,056
Default Re: Romney's rate Really Around 30% due to double Taxation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IcyPatriot View Post
Chico the point is that 13% is the lowest and go up from there ...
the premise that the guy is a criminal or felon or tax cheat or any of the things Obama has accused him of is wrong. Now if one wants to say he should have paid more ... well fine ... that's another topic. But the guy is not a tax cheat.
Has Obama accused him of being a tax cheat?

As for 13% being the low point -- yes, of course. But the title is not correct, 13's claim that the analysis was "correct" was wrong, and the 25% estimate isn't as reasonable as the author made it out to be.

Last edited by chicowalker; 08-21-2012 at 09:59 PM..
chicowalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 10:06 PM   #7
----> Iron Mod <----
 
IcyPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 31,494
Default Re: Romney's rate Really Around 30% due to double Taxation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chicowalker View Post
Has Obama accused him of being a tax cheat?


As for 13% being the low point -- yes, of course. But 13's claim that the analysis was "correct" was wrong, and the 25% estimate isn't as reasonable as the author made it out to be.
There's to much to copy and paste there ... the article ends this way.

Quote:
Thus, the Romney’s total income and taxes paid must also be adjusted up by 33% (1.33-(.25*1.33)=1) of the amount of their $12.6 million in capital gains income, or $4.2 million. After this adjustment, the Romney’s “Adjusted Total Income” is $27.0 million, and their “Adjusted Total Federal Income Tax Payments” are $8.3 million, $5.3 million more than reported on their tax return and 30.7% of their Adjusted Total Income.

Readers may quibble over the magnitude of these adjustments. But, even if they were reduced by a third, Mr. and Mrs. Romney’s properly calculated federal income tax payments were one-quarter of their Adjusted Total Income, an average rate significantly above the average rate paid by President and Mrs. Obama.
IcyPatriot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2012, 09:32 AM   #8
In the Starting Line-up
 
Patradomous's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,077
My Mood: Cynical
Default Re: Romney's rate Really Around 30% due to double Taxation.

Don't worry if Obamas IRS had something on Romney it would be out there by now.
What Obamas media would do under full disclosure is find out that Romney had invested in some company that had 10% ownership by a known KKK and NAMBLA member who was funded by a drug lord with child slaves. And this would be the new narrative when it was proven that Romneys taxes were in order.
Just another distraction game that the leftwing children fall for over and over again.
Patradomous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2012, 09:36 AM   #9
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,092
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Romney's rate Really Around 30% due to double Taxation.

The tax thing will continue Obama can't talk about the economy and unemployment so the freak show will continue.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
patsfan13 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2012, 09:59 AM   #10
All Pro Poster
 

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 11,056
Default Re: Romney's rate Really Around 30% due to double Taxation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IcyPatriot View Post
There's to much to copy and paste there ... the article ends this way.
So the author acknowledges that the estimates may be off but still fails to point out that many companies and transactions are structured in tax-advantageous ways and writes off ctiricism of his assumptions as "quibbling."

Look, if your point is simply that the effective tax rate on the earnings was somewhere above 13%, fine -- you're absolutely correct. But the article and a conclusion that the rate was really around 30% is flawed.
chicowalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Romney's VP Holy Diver Political Discussion 29 08-11-2012 07:35 AM
Romney's Chappaquidik Patters Political Discussion 120 07-18-2012 11:51 PM
Progressive Taxation: supported by Adam Smith and most economists Phokus Political Discussion 1 10-03-2009 06:17 PM
Consumer prices rise at double the expected rate reflexblue Political Discussion 10 08-14-2008 04:35 PM
Romney's In . . . What a Sad (R) group BelichickFan Political Discussion 3 02-13-2007 12:44 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC