Al Qaeda leader killed in drone strike in Pakistan - New England Patriots Forums

Holy Diver · 06-05-2012, 12:46 PM

U.S. official: Al Qaeda leader killed in drone strike in Pakistan - CNN.com

Only posting cuz the dude kinda looks like Kevin Faulk.

***shmessy*** · 06-05-2012, 12:50 PM

Drone strike kills No. 2 Al Qaeda leader in Pakistan | Fox News

Another one bites the dust.

Mrs.PatsFanInVa · 06-05-2012, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shmessy

Drone strike kills No. 2 Al Qaeda leader in Pakistan | Fox News

Another one bites the dust.

LOL
OT: Did you know that that song and "Stayin' Alive" are the only two songs that one can perform near-perfect CPR to?

***IcyPatriot*** · 06-05-2012, 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shmessy

Drone strike kills No. 2 Al Qaeda leader in Pakistan | Fox News

Another one bites the dust.

You can run but you cannot hide ...

does Obama use XBOX 360 or Playstation 3 for this.

I believe they used 4 missiles for this one ... I guess they wanted to make sure.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia/2...051688453.html

Patriot_in_NY · 06-05-2012, 01:01 PM

Crime doesn't pay

Mrs.PatsFanInVa · 06-05-2012, 01:17 PM

It's interesting...in 2007, Romney was accusing the Democrats of using “defeatist” language on terrorism and the war in Iraq. Rudolph W. Giuliani was being even tougher, calling Democrats the “party of losers” who “refuse to admit the existence of Islamic terrorism.”

Obama, on the other hand, was quietly promising that, when he became president, we would

Quote:

"wage the war that has to be won, with a comprehensive strategy with five elements: getting out of Iraq and on to the right battlefield in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing the capabilities and partnerships we need to take out the terrorists and the world’s most deadly weapons; engaging the world to dry up support for terror and extremism; restoring our values; and securing a more resilient homeland.”

The first step must be getting off the wrong battlefield in Iraq, and taking the fight to the terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

But let me make this clear. There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al Qaeda leadership meeting in 2005. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won’t act, we will.

I will not hesitate to use military force to take out terrorists who pose a direct threat to America. This requires a broader set of capabilities, as outlined in the Army and Marine Corps’s new counter-insurgency manual. I will ensure that our military becomes more stealth, agile, and lethal in its ability to capture or kill terrorists.

https://my.barackobama.com/page/comm...p/ObamaHQ/CpHR

Obama may not have done everything he said he would do - but he's done this - and yet, Mitt Romney, when asked to grade him on foreign policy and terrorism, gave him an "F."

What does that tell you?

Real World · 06-05-2012, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mrs.PatsFanInVa

It's interesting...in 2007, Romney was accusing the Democrats of using “defeatist” language on terrorism and the war in Iraq. Rudolph W. Giuliani was being even tougher, calling Democrats the “party of losers” who “refuse to admit the existence of Islamic terrorism.”

Obama, on the other hand, was quietly promising that, when he became president, we would

https://my.barackobama.com/page/comm...p/ObamaHQ/CpHR

Obama may not have done everything he said he would do - but he's done this - and yet, Mitt Romney, when asked to grade him on foreign policy and terrorism, gave him an "F."

What does that tell you?

It tells you that there's an election going on, and coke is running against pepsi, and pepsi against coke.

***DarrylS*** · 06-05-2012, 02:08 PM

This is the 16th time that they have gotten Al Qaeda #2....

IllegalContact · 06-05-2012, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarrylS

This is the 16th time that they have gotten Al Qaeda #2....

who works for #2?

***Harry Boy*** · 06-05-2012, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mrs.PatsFanInVa

It's interesting...in 2007, Romney was accusing the Democrats of using “defeatist” language on terrorism and the war in Iraq. Rudolph W. Giuliani was being even tougher, calling Democrats the “party of losers” who “refuse to admit the existence of Islamic terrorism.”

Obama, on the other hand, was quietly promising that, when he became president, we would

https://my.barackobama.com/page/comm...p/ObamaHQ/CpHR

Obama may not have done everything he said he would do - but he's done this - and yet, Mitt Romney, when asked to grade him on foreign policy and terrorism, gave him an "F."

What does that tell you?

Killing The Enemy:
Thats why a lot of the Maureen Dowd Loons are dumping him and it's one of the things I applaud him for even though I make fun of his Drones, he's got that Killer Instinct, like Bush.