Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Words that will get you on the Department of Homeland Security Watch list
Looking at this list we all must be on the DHS watch list. Seriously i can't believe this list contains such commonly used words. According to the article these will potentially trigger your being put on a watch list, heres some of them.
Attack, drill, prevention, response, cloud, shooting, crash, disaster, facility, iraq, flu, pork. etc. I' surely on the watch list now
The Department of Homeland Security has been forced to release a list of keywords and phrases it uses to monitor social networking sites and online media for signs of terrorist or other threats against the U.S.
The intriguing the list includes obvious choices such as 'attack', 'Al Qaeda', 'terrorism' and 'dirty bomb' alongside dozens of seemingly innocent words like 'pork', 'cloud', 'team' and 'Mexico'.
Released under a freedom of information request, the information sheds new light on how government analysts are instructed to patrol the internet searching for domestic and external threats. Department chiefs were forced to release the manual following a House hearing over documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit which revealed how analysts monitor social networks and media organisations for comments that 'reflect adversely' on the government.
Last edited by Hebeill; 05-27-2012 at 08:11 AM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Words that will get you on the Department of Homeland Security Watch list
I'm pretty sure the fascists lost the second World War, but I increasingly wonder if the movement just went underground and changed venues.
of course, the blame can be pinned on anyone who routed for the the Iraq Resolution, the Patriot Act, the NDAA and a number of other fascist, freedom-stripping, fear-obsessed legislation the past 11 years. They know precisely who they are.
who knew that merely typing the words "Mexico" or "prevention" or "pork" could immediately result in your privacy being raped.
Jezus, we've literally become Orwell's vision.
Last edited by Titus Pullo; 05-27-2012 at 09:49 PM..
Re: Words that will get you on the Department of Homeland Security Watch list
Let us not pretend that these are the first shots fired in the attack on our freedom. Clearly, the authorities are holding us hostage, citing prevention of terrorist acts, as if an outbreak of jihad, shooting, bombing, and organized crime will plague this country if we burst out with a tsunami of a supposedly toxic list of words.
Of course, the real epidemic here is the wave of hazardous thinking that has infected millions of Americans, in what is best described as a spillover effect from our susceptibility to persuasion after watching the horrible terror attack by Al Qaeda eleven years ago. I know, I know. Some of you think that it was a plot by our own domestic security forces in an effort to create the Department of Homeland Security, invade Iraq, and allow Israel to unleash its army against the PLO, Hamas, and the PLF. The fact is that this disaster came from that event and, to tell the truth, the warnings about the overreach of national security in the name of mitigating terrorism and national preparedness have had long exposure, even if dismissed as the rantings of constitutional radicals.
I could write an avalanche of thoughts on this radioactive power grab by our own law enforcement. Perhaps, if I ever have the initiative to recall some of the of steps that have effectively led to the assassination of our first amendment rights, among others, I'll post again. But, for now, I have to use the facility.
------------------ “On a day when they could have had impact players David Terrell or Koren Robinson..they took Georgia defensive tackle Richard Seymour, who had 1 sacks last season in the pass-happy SEC and is too tall to play tackle at 6-6 and too slow to play defensive end. This genius move was followed by trading out of a spot where they could have gotten the last decent receiver in Robert Ferguson and settled for tackle Matt Light, who will not help any time soon.”
Re: Words that will get you on the Department of Homeland Security Watch list
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolai
Let us not pretend that these are the first shots fired in the attack on our freedom.
Let us not pretend anyone is pretending that. It's been going on for over a decade.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolai
Of course, the real epidemic here is the wave of hazardous thinking that has infected millions of Americans, in what is best described as a spillover effect from our susceptibility to persuasion after watching the horrible terror attack by Al Qaeda eleven years ago.
OK, good. ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolai
I know, I know. Some of you think that it was a plot by our own domestic security forces in an effort to create the Department of Homeland Security, invade Iraq, and allow Israel to unleash its army against the PLO, Hamas, and the PLF.
That's quite an extrapolation. Who has said this? ... I will not say our "security forces" made it happen, but I will say they knew it was coming and did nothing. The evidence there is abundant, including "The Phoenix Memo." As for the Israel "unleashed" narrative, that's a first for me. Cool story.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolai
The fact is that this disaster came from that event and, to tell the truth, the warnings about the overreach of national security in the name of mitigating terrorism and national preparedness....
No. They are "in the name of" maintaining control and obedience over a dumb populace easily fooled by rippling flags and spooky stories of WMD that never existed. They are "in the name" of monitoring your spending habits and providing more insidious advertising into every aspect of your life. And above all else, "in the name of" ever more obtrusive legislation. They don't even have to throw you in jail any more, the mere allegation and wealth-draining legal process is enough to destroy citizens' lives.
What was it Shrub once said as he toyed with the color threat warning throughout 2002-2005? "Be vigilant, but keep shopping!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolai
I could write an avalanche of thoughts on this radioactive power grab by our own law enforcement. Perhaps, if I ever have the initiative to recall some of the of steps that have effectively led to the assassination of our first amendment rights, among others, I'll post again. But, for now, I have to use the facility.
Your outrage seems convincing. But when did it start?
Last edited by Titus Pullo; 05-27-2012 at 11:06 PM..
Re: Words that will get you on the Department of Homeland Security Watch list
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titus Pullo
Your outrage seems convincing. But when did it start?
I thought I was probably on your ignore list. Eh...
Anyway, I think a key point of the post went over your head. I'm having a bit of fun. With experience, I've come to realize that full-time bitterness is no way to go through this one life we have.
In any event, I've spoken out against erosion of our freedoms long before it became chic to do so. The difference is that I see threats to our freedom from both sides of the political spectrum (not as the exclusive domain of the right), and I don't see these threats as something that emerged exclusively after 9/11.
Believe it or not, one can be involved in national security and believe in the maintenance of our liberty and civil rights.
__________________
We get what we deserve.
------------------ “On a day when they could have had impact players David Terrell or Koren Robinson..they took Georgia defensive tackle Richard Seymour, who had 1 sacks last season in the pass-happy SEC and is too tall to play tackle at 6-6 and too slow to play defensive end. This genius move was followed by trading out of a spot where they could have gotten the last decent receiver in Robert Ferguson and settled for tackle Matt Light, who will not help any time soon.”
Re: Words that will get you on the Department of Homeland Security Watch list
oh shock of all shocks, the federal government monitors what people do online. Why does that matter?
Google, Apple, and every company in existence do as well. There are private subscription only databases that can pin point every little detail of your life that you never wanted anyone to know with something as obscure as a third or fourth email address you forgot you ever had.
In Europe, VPN's are not just a nice idea, but becoming more of a must have for anyone who wants to use the internet.
Privacy does not extend beyond the walls of your house. The internet does.
BTW, 9/11 was not the beginning of anything. It was just one of a multitude of attacks, started a long time ago, by people who couldn't handle freedom for anyone. There is a reason it never lasts long.
__________________
Silence is Golden
I have been broken
Safe in my own skin
So nobody wins
__________________ “ I think good coaches will coach with the personnel they have, and if you only have one (good) linebacker, you’re not going to play a 3–4. ”
—Hank Bullough, who installed one of the first 3–4 defenses with the New England Patriots.