ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
In The Absence Of Law And Order Society Will Surely Destroy Itself
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Now your talking, God Bless the Untited States Of America, God Bless Jesus Christ, God Bless God, f-ck the c-ckroaches.
actually, no... Like most of the forum, I usually ignore you, because you seldom have anything insightful to offer... but I'm kinda sick of your **** lately.
It's time you're pressed on an issue you started, instead of being allowed to just escape from yet another dumb thread premise with a curse-laiden jape and an emote.
So, I'll be direct: Why don't you answer the flip side of the coin I challenged you with? ... At what point does the "secret things" that the spooks engage in become unethical, in your estimation? Illegal accounting tricks? Drug running? Ambassador murder? Iraq fraud? ... Torture?
Do you even agree that an enormous portion of what they do is unethical? Or do you just see those unethical acts as necessary? ... If the latter, why are they necessary? Because troops are "in harm's way" without said information obtained under torture?
You presented the passionate thread title, so own it.
Flesh it out, Harry. Write something comprehensive for once, too. Hopefully without some dumb parable or sophomoric metaphors to bodily function or wife swapping. Think you can do that for once?
Last edited by Titus Pullo; 01-24-2012 at 12:30 AM..
I notice that you tend to use the same material that I present. And lately, you do it a lot. I doubt you even realize it.
Either way, instead of projecting again with a pink cartoon, ... why don't you chime in on the whole Wikileaks/whistleblower/torture theme and draw the line - as Wolfpack sees it - on where/when state secrets start.
Try to avoid the obligatory false narrative about how whole platoons might be "wiped out" without the information obtained from the local taxi driver who yelled "jihad!" once a bit too loud.
When are state secrets a problem for a "functioning democracy?"
Imagine where chicken hawks would stand if some brave CIA operative leaked a story about some uncompromising anti-global warming analysis the agency conducted. Probably different then, I'm sure.
Last edited by Titus Pullo; 01-24-2012 at 12:29 AM..