You can't HANDLE the truth! ... Americans... - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums

PatriotsReign · 12-07-2011, 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mrs.PatsFanInVa

And did anyone really think a non-Islamic group would get in?

I dunno...but some members referred to the Islamic Brotherhood as less significant.

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatsFanInVa

It's also interesting that this was a side-rally, and the main rally was dominated by secularists across town.

PFnV

***DarrylS*** · 12-07-2011, 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patsfan13

I have said conservative libertarian, but the difference would escape you as anything beyond hard left does.

Do you fit into this definition from Repbublican Liberty Council(aka the Conservative Libertarians), or are you making this up as you go along?? This on foreign relations..

http://www.rlc.org/about/statement-of-principles/

Quote:

Peaceful diplomatic relations, free trade and open borders enhance the ability of citizens to travel, engage in international commerce and support the pursuit of liberty everywhere in the world.

We support equitable treaties that enhance the security and exchange with other nations, but oppose any agreement that infringes on the sovereignty of the United States.

We support policies conducive to economic liberty, such as the reduction and elimination of all import and export restrictions on private trade, both as a unilateral policy and through multi-lateral agreements.

We favor the phasing out of all foreign aid, or payments to other nations or international bodies, as a form of global welfare and commercial intervention.

ON national defense..

Quote:

We favor foreign military action only upon a Declaration of War by Congress in the face of an imminent and clear threat to the United States. We favor a clear strategy for entrance into and conclusion of any foreign engagement and a definable goal that constitutes victory.

We oppose the exercise of executive War Powers in the absence of a Declaration, except in the face of an immediate and direct threat to the United States. We oppose any treaty or international agreement that puts American troops under the control or authority of any other executive or administrative power.

***patsfan13*** · 12-07-2011, 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcdavey

so you're pro democracy, but only when the party you support, wins? lol

Hitler won an election I think that was a bad thing, YMMV.

If you have an election and the party that wins is committed to obliterating their neighbor, yeah I am against that.

PatriotsReign · 12-07-2011, 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patsfan13

Hitler won an election I think that was a bad thing, YMMV.

If you have an election and the party that wins is committed to obliterating their neighbor, yeah I am against that.

And so is JCDavey!

chicowalker · 12-07-2011, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patsfan13

Hitler won an election I think that was a bad thing, YMMV.

If you have an election and the party that wins is committed to obliterating their neighbor, yeah I am against that.

Of course, that's the easy part. The hard part is what to do, if anything, given that it is a foreign nation.

***patsfan13*** · 12-07-2011, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chicowalker

Of course, that's the easy part. The hard part is what to do, if anything, given that it is a foreign nation.

We shouldn't have helped get rid of Mubarak earlier this year. Remember how pleased Obama was that Mubarak was ousted?

Stuoid as usual. Perhaps he thought Egypt was one of the 57 states....