ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
... republicans think that its SPENDING thats the problem. ..
Now you're talking out both sides of your mouth -- and ignoring facts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KDPPatsfan85
... They arent paying taxes at all or contributing to society AT ALL ...
That is false.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KDPPatsfan85
... ... Illegals are not people, ...
but this, really, says it all
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
I know who's fault it is. It's the moron public who's too ignorant, too dumb, and too partisan to understand how ****ed up our government is, and has been, for a couple of generations now. Anyone who thinks this problem started with this administration, or the previous administration, falls into my second sentence. Sure different pols, policies, and administrations add different levels of unsustainability and debt to the bottom line, but our trajectory for decades has been U-N-S-U-S-T-A-I-N-A-B-L-E. We're broke, and the day of reckoning is coming. I hope you're all prepared.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
I know who's fault it is. It's the moron public who's too ignorant, too dumb, and too partisan to understand how ****ed up our government is, and has been, for a couple of generations now. Anyone who thinks this problem started with this administration, or the previous administration, falls into my second sentence. Sure different pols, policies, and administrations add different levels of unsustainability and debt to the bottom line, but our trajectory for decades has been U-N-S-U-S-T-A-I-N-A-B-L-E. We're broke, and the day of reckoning is coming. I hope you're all prepared.
Debt % change during presidency:
Carter- 42 (10.6/yr) Reagan- 189 (23.6/yr)
Bush I- 55.6 (13.9/yr)
Clinton- 36 (4.4/yr)
Bush II- 89 (11.1/yr)
Obama- 34 (13.6/yr)
Not blaming anyone. Just saying that it looks like someone...not saying any names...was a bit of a big spender. Ohhhhh, how I wish for the good old days when the USA and the CCCP had a nice, tidy cold war going and everyone else was scared *****less of the both of us.
Is it still OK to blame past mistakes on past presidents or is everything still Obama's fault and responsibility?
Let's not forget that traditional wisdom tells us that you do not start a war and lower taxes at the same time.
Only once before Bush has that happened....and that was by JFK in the very early years of Viet Nam - long before the extent of our involvement there was fully known.
Traditionally taxes are raised in times of war - because most reasonably intelligent people understand that wars are costly business and you will need increased revenue to pay for them.
Carter- 42 (10.6/yr) Reagan- 189 (23.6/yr)
Bush I- 55.6 (13.9/yr)
Clinton- 36 (4.4/yr)
Bush II- 89 (11.1/yr)
Obama- 34 (13.6/yr)
Not blaming anyone. Just saying that it looks like someone...not saying any names...was a bit of a big spender. Ohhhhh, how I wish for the good old days when the USA and the CCCP had a nice, tidy cold war going and everyone else was scared *****less of the both of us.
Is it still OK to blame past mistakes on past presidents or is everything still Obama's fault and responsibility?
That's too simplistic a way to look at debt. You really need to look at the specific policies, there effects, what entitlements meant, as well as the conditions at the time. I think there is a graph somewhere that shows a correlation between our debt, and the eleimination of the gold standard. I might be wrong, but I thought it showed a spike thereafter. That or maybe it was some other policy that resulted in the spike.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Whenever someone starts talking about "percentage change" that immediately should sound warning alarms that the person is going to present some jury rigged statistics.
Whenever someone starts talking about "percentage change" that immediately should sound warning alarms that the person is going to present some jury rigged statistics.
When have I ever done that? That's a false statement. Do you think there is no such thing as pct. change or a valid use for it? Why bother with such a throw-away post?
All I did was notice something in a table. The numbers for Bush were surprisingly good overall until the economy crashed in his last year. I was surprised how well Clinton did. And when I say those names, I understand the myriad of factors internally and externally which influence the debt. Only a complete and utter fool would not recognize that the national debt should NEVER be directly and exclusively the fault of one individual. Such fools need to see things in a bigger picture.
Lucky for me neither you nor anyone else had anything to offer in the way of an arguement...so I win!
When have I ever done that? That's a false statement. Do you think there is no such thing as pct. change or a valid use for it? Why bother with such a throw-away post?
All I did was notice something in a table. The numbers for Bush were surprisingly good overall until the economy crashed in his last year. I was surprised how well Clinton did. And when I say those names, I understand the myriad of factors internally and externally which influence the debt. Only a complete and utter fool would not recognize that the national debt should be directly and exclusively be the fault of one individual. Such fools need to see things in a bigger picture.
Lucky for me neither you nor anyone else had anything to offer in the way of an arguement...so I win!
yeah, that's pretty ridiculous, even for wolfie -- he don't like dem dere "percentages" -- how can you trust 'em?