Taxes--Obama v. McCain - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-19-2008, 04:09 PM   #21
The Devil's Reject
 
otis p. driftwood's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,280
Default Re: Taxes--Obama v. McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holy Diver View Post
subset.......

You are hedging your bets against the criminals by diversifying with mutual funds.

knowing that the market is fueled by criminals...having the mutual fund allows for faster liquidity so you can get the f out when the getting is good. try doing that with a CD or a bunch of bonds.
A CD or a bunch of bonds aren't stock. So far I'm actually doing pretty well, and it's fun. I buy a lot of stuff for the return, I don't play much with speculative stuff...actually I don't speculate at all. My speculative play is a gold/copper company. LOL
__________________
Questions are a burden
and answers a prison
for oneself.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
otis p. driftwood is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 06-19-2008, 04:12 PM   #22
The Devil's Reject
 
otis p. driftwood's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,280
Default Re: Taxes--Obama v. McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildo7 View Post
A higher percentage i.e. proportionally more.
If they closed all loopholes, eliminated all deductions, and set an exemption of 17 or 18K, then taxed the rest, everyone would get hit equally. That would even get the super rich who live off of interest and trusts.

But wistah is really making me think about the sales tax idea...I just don't know.
__________________
Questions are a burden
and answers a prison
for oneself.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
otis p. driftwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 04:14 PM   #23
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,494
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: Taxes--Obama v. McCain

Well, Democrats chose to steal the economic mantle from the Republicans after Reagan, though he cut taxes, also ran up record deficits (record, until Bush II that is). I think Democrats recognize that politically/strategically being known as fiscally prudent undercuts the Republicans who are all talk and little action.

Clinton lowered taxes on the poor and raised taxes for the wealthiest 1%. Taxes on the middle class were unchanged. But, Clinton also reduced the deficit by something like $500 billion. I think Democrats will stick with the Clinton formula since it's politically viable and works well for the economy.

As to the claim that rich people drive the economy, not "ordinary" people, I don't think that's true especially now that so much ordinary wealth is invested in retirement funds. In addition, ordinary people certainly spend a much higher percentage of their disposable income on products and services than the wealthy.

Do the poor get more from the system than the rich? Of course not. The system is what generates the wealth for the wealthy. If we had a different system, the wealthy might not be so wealthy. So, it makes sense that the wealthy should pay higher taxes. I say let the market determine taxes. If we raise taxes too much on the wealthy and it has a detrimental effect on the economy, then we can lower their taxes. The Republican idea of a flat tax is essentially socialist in that it's mandated by government policy, not driven by the market.
Patters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 06:02 PM   #24
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,277
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Taxes--Obama v. McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildo7 View Post
If you benefit more from the system you should pay more, especially when you usually benefit at the cost of others.
How does one person benefit more than another, if you don't mind me asking?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 06:04 PM   #25
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,277
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Taxes--Obama v. McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by a.paul View Post
If they closed all loopholes, eliminated all deductions, and set an exemption of 17 or 18K, then taxed the rest, everyone would get hit equally. That would even get the super rich who live off of interest and trusts.

But wistah is really making me think about the sales tax idea...I just don't know.
By sales tax, do you mean a consumption tax on a federal level in place of income tax? If so, I'm very, very interesting in that concept myself.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 06:06 PM   #26
The Devil's Reject
 
otis p. driftwood's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,280
Default Re: Taxes--Obama v. McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by Real World View Post
By sales tax, do you mean a consumption tax on a federal level in place of income tax? If so, I'm very, very interesting in that concept myself.
Yes, the so called Fair Tax. I was more in favor of a flat Steve Forbes type of income tax, but wistah beat me down pretty good about the morality of taxing someone's blood and sweat.

My main worries with the Fair Tax are an underground economy and turning contractors into tax collectors--in effect making everyone part of the IRS.

But he said you guys already have to account for that sort of thing in Mass...and it's NBD, so I don't know.
__________________
Questions are a burden
and answers a prison
for oneself.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
otis p. driftwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 06:13 PM   #27
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,277
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Taxes--Obama v. McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patters View Post
Well, Democrats chose to steal the economic mantle from the Republicans after Reagan, though he cut taxes, also ran up record deficits (record, until Bush II that is). I think Democrats recognize that politically/strategically being known as fiscally prudent undercuts the Republicans who are all talk and little action.

Clinton lowered taxes on the poor and raised taxes for the wealthiest 1%. Taxes on the middle class were unchanged. But, Clinton also reduced the deficit by something like $500 billion. I think Democrats will stick with the Clinton formula since it's politically viable and works well for the economy.

As to the claim that rich people drive the economy, not "ordinary" people, I don't think that's true especially now that so much ordinary wealth is invested in retirement funds. In addition, ordinary people certainly spend a much higher percentage of their disposable income on products and services than the wealthy.

Do the poor get more from the system than the rich? Of course not. The system is what generates the wealth for the wealthy. If we had a different system, the wealthy might not be so wealthy. So, it makes sense that the wealthy should pay higher taxes. I say let the market determine taxes. If we raise taxes too much on the wealthy and it has a detrimental effect on the economy, then we can lower their taxes. The Republican idea of a flat tax is essentially socialist in that it's mandated by government policy, not driven by the market.
Sorry to whiz on your parade, but the national debt has gone up every year since the 50's. Furthermore, look around the world at the debt of developed nations, and notice how many of their graphs spike in the last 5-25 years. Why? Entitlement programs. Countries simply can't satisfy their thirst.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2008, 06:14 PM   #28
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,277
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Taxes--Obama v. McCain

Quote:
Originally Posted by a.paul View Post
Yes, the so called Fair Tax. I was more in favor of a flat Steve Forbes type of income tax, but wistah beat me down pretty good about the morality of taxing someone's blood and sweat.

My main worries with the Fair Tax are an underground economy and turning contractors into tax collectors--in effect making everyone part of the IRS.

But he said you guys already have to account for that sort of thing in Mass...and it's NBD, so I don't know.
Where did you guys discuss this?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC