Patriot_in_NY

Show me DECEIT. I'm saying there is an agenda, and no proof.

__________________
Patroit_in_NY is now Patriot_in_ABQ

Wildo7

The fact that you chose ONE out of ELEVEN and failed to acknowledge the other evidence says enough.

otis p. driftwood

Well, you're one of the people who says the Bush administration is completely incompetent after all...

__________________
Questions are a burden
and answers a prison
for oneself.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Wildo7

Um no actually, the Supreme Court had nothing to do with it. And the U.S. would never release a terrorist only to put his face on card #16 of the most wanted. Does that make sense to you?

And I haven't even seen the U.S. deny this yet, so the "someone is lying" excuse is a tad premature don't ya think?

Here's a question for you: In the right wing mind, does it make sense that someone imprisoned wrongfully, without any idea of time, place or status, and probably abused would most likely strongly dislike his captor upon release? Or does the flag worship block your mind from thinking about such things?

Wildo7

When did I say that? The Bush administration is very competent at doin what it wants to do.

And that's another pathetic argument, especially for someone who throws around the "apologist" label like it's going out of fashion.

otis p. driftwood

Apologist label? I've only called Patters that that I know of--and there's a whole different dynamic at work there--remember the other day when you got mad at FTW and posted "I dare you to give me an infraction"? It's that kind of thing with Patters. I like him, but he overstepped on something.

And I should've put a or even a in my post.

__________________
Questions are a burden
and answers a prison
for oneself.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Patriot_in_NY

Of the 11, the seven at Abu, assuming they can prove they were abused, should be compensated, as known abuses occurred then during the period they were there. Of the other 4, they only gave specifics on 1, and as I outlined, details on that one are skeptical at best and should be looked at as such.

Talk abut cherry picking............ this study CHOSE to focus on Abu Ghraib during the time that KNOWN ABUSES took place there. It conveniently ignores the fact that that is ONE VERY ISOLATED period in the 7 years history of dealing with THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS of prisoners and treated them far more decently that we could ever expect to be treated in return, the wide majority of them being GUILTY as sin.

Tell you what, I'll answer that question, when you answer this one. In your left wing, "I HATE AMERICA" brain, does it ever embarrass you to spew your hate filled rhetoric knowing that people that were FAR BETTER THEN YOU died to give you that right.

I'm not talking being critical of our country............. We all are from time to time...... including me, so I have no problem with that. YOU ARE ALWAYS critical and since you hate this country so much, I don't know how you sleep at night in this here in the place you obviously LOOTHE so much. People like you disgust me.

__________________
Patroit_in_NY is now Patriot_in_ABQ

Wildo7

I don't hate this country, I hate it's leadership and some of the things it's done. Maybe some day you'll figure out the difference. Hopefully soon. People like you amuse me. And which war exactly have we fought in the last 60 years in defense of my right to free speech? Care to give an example? Which country has actually attacked us since WWII? Oh that's right, none.

Patriot_in_NY

The War on Terror.....................

Sorry it escaped you.

__________________
Patroit_in_NY is now Patriot_in_ABQ

Wildo7

Thanks for the laugh, sorry you fell for that.