ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
It's beginning to look like the election will be between Obama and Romney. This was the result I was and am hoping for. While Romney poses the greatest threat to an Obama reelection, at least he's a moderate. If the Democrats retain control of the Senate or get control of the House they will be able to exert considerable control over his policies. In addition, he's unlikely to try to appoint far right SC justices, dramatically cut entitlements, or weaken anti-discrimination policies. Romney is very much a chameleon, who will adapt to a changing political environment as necessary. Romneycare has worked well in MA, and though he's not pro-gay marriage, he's not anti gay rights. He reminds me in many ways of Bush I, a man weak in principal who will do no more than pay lip service to the more radical elements in the Republican Party. And, if nothing else, he appears to be the most intelligent of the Republican candidates, able to think on his feet in debates and able to express himself intelligently.
Of course, he's no shoo-in for president because he'll lose a lot of the enthusiasm of the Tea Party, may induce a libertarian like Ron Paul to run as a third party candidate, is Mormon (which bothers a lot of evangelicals), and has been inconsistent. But, overall, I think independents and moderates will give him a more serious look than they might give a Tea Party candidate.
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Of course, he's no shoo-in for president because he'll lose a lot of the enthusiasm of the Tea Party, may induce a libertarian like Ron Paul to run as a third party candidate, is Mormon (which bothers a lot of evangelicals), and has been inconsistent. But, overall, I think independents and moderates will give him a more serious look than they might give a Tea Party candidate.
I think a lot will depend on who he'd pick for a running mate. If he picked Christie (in spite of all of Christie's protestations that he needed to finish his term as governor of NJ when he refused to run for president, I don't hear the same sort of "finish what I promised the good citizens of New Jersey" when the possibility of running mate has been discussed) I think that a lot of the hard core Tea Party people might vote for him regardless of his moderate stance and cultish religion.
I suppose I could live with him, too....but I sure wish Huntsman had made a better showing. I'd be a lot more comfortable with him than I am with Romney.
Could Hillary get rid of Obama, will the people fall for "the oprah bull*****" this time around, the people certainly don't go for that leg tingling speech crap anymore.
They don't call Bill Clinton "Slick Willie" for nothing after the way she was stabbed in the back I don't think Hillary would be worried about offending any so called "friends" I think the democrat party knows that Hillary would landslide any one of the current republicans I think they also know that anybody can beat Obama.
Remember "Slick Willie" is still alive and kicking.
GOD HELP AMERICA
__________________
Harry Boy (Genius)
In The Absence Of Law And Order Society Will Surely Destroy Itself
I suppose I could live with him, too....but I sure wish Huntsman had made a better showing. I'd be a lot more comfortable with him than I am with Romney.
So Obama is done then? Will you vote for Obama? Else, why do you care?
That would be sort of a war of attrition, I think. With the base on the left somewhat alienated with Obama and Romney likely alienating the conservative base we might see an all-time high of voter apathy.
forget all my "Rick perry is Jesus" crap...Romney is the best candidate the republicans have. Thats not really saying much. Obama is what the democrats have, thats not saying much either.
either way...its gunna be a LONG primary season, and an even LONGER 4 years after...
I'm surprised we didn't see Jeb Bush throw his hat in the mix.
Spercial interests will now spend untold fortunes to elect one of these pawns....
That would be sort of a war of attrition, I think. With the base on the left somewhat alienated with Obama and Romney likely alienating the conservative base we might see an all-time high of voter apathy.
I think that could very well happen. On the other hand, there are the Congressional races to motivate the left and right, and most people who go to the polls would probably vote for who they thought was the lesser of two evils. I know if Romney is the nominee, I will contribute to Congressional candidates, not Obama, which was not my intent if the nominee was Perry or someone like that.
One interesting possibility if it's Romney v. Obama, could this be the year for a third-party candidate? Could the 99%ers and the Tea Partiers find enough common ground to support a candidate? Perhaps someone like Ron Paul could get some real footing, taking enough votes from Obama and Romney so that people would not feel like a vote for him was really a vote for the person they like least.
So Obama is done then? Will you vote for Obama? Else, why do you care?
Not really sure who I'll vote for. If I had to vote today, I'd vote for Obama, but I don't have vote today, do I?
All things change - nothing remains the same. There's a lot that can and probably will happen in the next year. Obama could do something dreadful - something dreadful could come out about Romney - Huntsman could make a dramatic surge - we could all be wiped out by the next Ebola virus.
I tend to look ahead with reservations - and leave my options open.
I think that could very well happen. On the other hand, there are the Congressional races to motivate the left and right, and most people who go to the polls would probably vote for who they thought was the lesser of two evils. I know if Romney is the nominee, I will contribute to Congressional candidates, not Obama, which was not my intent if the nominee was Perry or someone like that.
One interesting possibility if it's Romney v. Obama, could this be the year for a third-party candidate? Could the 99%ers and the Tea Partiers find enough common ground to support a candidate? Perhaps someone like Ron Paul could get some real footing, taking enough votes from Obama and Romney so that people would not feel like a vote for him was really a vote for the person they like least.
Keep an eye out for referenda as well...I seem to remember that they played a big role in turnout for the 2004 election.