CA Supreme Court overides "Will of the People" - Page 5 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Five Thoughts On Tebow
'13 NFL Previews Are In
Tebow at QB? No Way

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-15-2008, 06:11 PM   #41
The Devil's Reject
 
otis p. driftwood's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,280
Default Re: CA Supreme Court overides "Will of the People"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildo7 View Post
Simple: polygamy involves more than two people and is illegal. Marriage is a right. It is not a privilege. If this country is going to have marriage give certain rights to married couples that non-married couples don't get, then denying certain people's ability to attain those rights because the people don't agree with their lifestyle is discriminatory and wrong. "Civil Union" is a term used to say that these people are second-class and not worthy of the "marriage" label. It's none of the "people's" business who marries who and why. If this is truly a free country, this constitutional amendment won't pass.
How do you figure marriage is a right?
__________________
Questions are a burden
and answers a prison
for oneself.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
otis p. driftwood is offline   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 05-15-2008, 06:15 PM   #42
Totally Full of It
 
Wildo7's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,836
Default Re: CA Supreme Court overides "Will of the People"

Oh and apparently FTW can't read properly, here's your "liberal judges legislating from the bench:

Quote:
In its 4-3 ruling, the Republican-dominated high court struck down state laws against same-sex marriage and said domestic partnerships that provide many of the rights and benefits of matrimony are not enough.
"legislating from the bench" is a hilarious term that's been used by both sides since the dawn of the judiciary. It's actually laughable that people still throw around that term and others are ignorant enough to believe it. All it means is "they made a ruling I don't agree with."

People made the same ridiculous arguments against interracial marriage and now they look like the bigots they are. I wonder which side of history some of you will be on.
Wildo7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 06:15 PM   #43
All Pro Poster
 
wistahpatsfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,668
Default Re: CA Supreme Court overides "Will of the People"

Quote:
Originally Posted by a.paul View Post
How do you figure marriage is a right?
Marriage is a right in the same way that we as adults (don't say it...I know what you're thinking) can - or should beable to - do whatever we want to do with another adult as long as there is mutual consent and no one else gets hurt. That's freedom. That's our right. Marriage is included.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
wistahpatsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 06:17 PM   #44
Totally Full of It
 
Wildo7's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,836
Default Re: CA Supreme Court overides "Will of the People"

Quote:
Originally Posted by a.paul View Post
How do you figure marriage is a right?
How do you figure it's not. Ever heard of a heterosexual couple being denied a marriage license?
Wildo7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 06:18 PM   #45
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,560
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: CA Supreme Court overides "Will of the People"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildo7 View Post
Simple: polygamy involves more than two people
If all involved are consenting . . . why not ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildo7 View Post
and is illegal.
So if we made being gay illegal then you'd be good with that ?
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 06:18 PM   #46
All Pro Poster
 
wistahpatsfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,668
Default Re: CA Supreme Court overides "Will of the People"

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan View Post
Since when is marriage a right ? It's a priviledge that the people don't want to bestow on gays. Why isn't polygamy a right ? Marriage is about society bestowing this on people whose lifestyle society approves of and, by a clear majority, that's not the case with gays.
Who the hell says that? Where did you get your "definition" of what marriage is? Can you even begin to cite a reference?...and please spare us the "word of God" for now, OK?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
wistahpatsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 06:18 PM   #47
Totally Full of It
 
Wildo7's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,836
Default Re: CA Supreme Court overides "Will of the People"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Real World View Post
So you're defining the term marraige?

I can't wait to marry my dad, and avoid all those disgusting inheritence taxes.
Incest is against the law, but that actually explains a lot. So you're equating homosexuals with inbreeding? Yeah, there's no bigotry here
Wildo7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 06:21 PM   #48
B.O. = Fugazi
 
BelichickFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,560
Send a message via AIM to BelichickFan
Default Re: CA Supreme Court overides "Will of the People"

Quote:
Originally Posted by wistahpatsfan View Post
Who the hell says that? Where did you get your "definition" of what marriage is? Can you even begin to cite a reference?...and please spare us the "word of God" for now, OK?
According to polls, it's clearly the will of the American people that marriage is between one man and one woman.

Regarding your God thing - chill, I'm agnositc; remember ?
BelichickFan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 06:22 PM   #49
The Devil's Reject
 
otis p. driftwood's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,280
Default Re: CA Supreme Court overides "Will of the People"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildo7 View Post
How do you figure it's not. Ever heard of a heterosexual couple being denied a marriage license?
Never paid any attention, honestly. I just don't remember seeing it in the Constitution anywhere...it's one of those things...it's been around forever, but just because it's a "custom" does that make it a "right"?

And don't read me wrong. I'm not a believer in marriage, gay, straight, vegetable, mineral...as far as I'm concerned it's just one more way the government is involved in our lives.
__________________
Questions are a burden
and answers a prison
for oneself.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
otis p. driftwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 06:23 PM   #50
Totally Full of It
 
Wildo7's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,836
Default Re: CA Supreme Court overides "Will of the People"

Quote:
Originally Posted by BelichickFan View Post
If all involved are consenting . . . why not ?


So if we made being gay illegal then you'd be good with that ?
You can't make it illegal, because it's unconstitutional. Look up Texas v. Lawrence. The point is that if you give certain rights to two people who form an agreement with each other consensually, you have to allow every adult the ability to attain those rights. It's not about approving or disapproving a "lifestyle," the law cannot discriminate when it comes to gender, so it can't say "a man and a women" only. Again, what goddamn business is it of yours anyway? If the majority didn't approve of interracial marriages should it be allowed to ban it?

Last edited by Wildo7; 05-15-2008 at 06:26 PM..
Wildo7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC