ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
This is excellent. I actually think that 2.5% is way too little. I pay 5+% to the state on my 5 figure pay, so why can't these billion dollar cash cows pay at least the same, or more? My favorite is the Harvard dude's response to the school paying 2.5% on the $34 BILLION they got sitting around.
Quote:
"You'd be taxing success here, over time, this would put us at a real competitive disadvantage..."
No *****.
Lawmakers target $1b endowments
Exempt status of schools debated
Email|Print|Single Page| Text size – + By Peter Schworm and Matt Viser
Globe Staff / May 8, 2008
Massachusetts lawmakers desperate for additional revenue are eyeing the endowments of deep-pocketed private colleges to bolster the state's coffers by more than $1 billion a year, asserting that the schools' rising fortunes undercut their nonprofit status.
more stories like thisLegislators have asked state finance officials to study a plan that would impose a 2.5 percent annual assessment on colleges with endowments over $1 billion, an amount now exceeded by nine Massachusetts institutions. The proposal, which higher education specialists believe is the first of its kind across the country, drew surprising support at a debate on the State House budget last week and is attracting attention in higher education circles nationally.
The idea has prompted a range of questions, including whether it is legal to infringe upon private colleges' tax-exempt status or single them out based on their wealth. It also faces significant opposition from the colleges and some skeptical lawmakers. But proponents say the colleges' vast accumulations of wealth - Harvard University has the biggest endowment at $34 billion - and their often modest contributions to their host communities justify the assessment.
.............
University leaders criticized the plan as a gimmick that would backfire by hurting institutions that are pivotal to the state. "You'd be taxing success here," said Kevin Casey, Harvard's associate vice president for government, community, and public affairs. "Over time, this would put us at a real competitive disadvantage, which would drastically hurt the Commonwealth."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Taxachusetts to target college's for "revenue"
This stuff is funny. Here you have these "non-profit" schools, buying up, and sitting on prime real estate, paying their staff handsomely, and not paying property taxes (or very, very little if at all), whining about paying less than half of what I pay to the state. Their defense is the best. Why is taxing them bad, but taxing me, or some other corporation good? If taxing success is bad, then shouldn't that rule be applied throughout? If taxing them is bad because they help the commonwealth, then couldn't the same argument be made for business' too?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Re: Taxachusetts to target college's for "revenue"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Real World
This stuff is funny. Here you have these "non-profit" schools, buying up, and sitting on prime real estate, paying their staff handsomely, and not paying property taxes (or very, very little if at all), whining about paying less than half of what I pay to the state. Their defense is the best. Why is taxing them bad, but taxing me, or some other corporation good? If taxing success is bad, then shouldn't that rule be applied throughout? If taxing them is bad because they help the commonwealth, then couldn't the same argument be made for business' too?
Whenever Harvard comes looking for money my wife gets really pizzed off that they would even dare to ask. Then goes into a rant about how much money they already have. Last year she wrote them a nasty (by Harvard standards) about it and told them not to bother her anymore when it comes to giving the school any money.
Re: Taxachusetts to target college's for "revenue"
I'm all for taxing private colleges at the standard rate as any other business. Harvard has more money than any of the "Corporations" that they say they hate.
Tax them at 44%, see how they like it!
__________________
The Jets look like a Super Bowl contender right now about as much as Rosie O’Donnell looks like a threat for the Miss America crown. -NY Post 12/19/2011
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: Taxachusetts to target college's for "revenue"
I'm a little shocked that RW would be in favor of the Mass legislature trolling for new ways to take money from more people. It's not going to change what they try to take from him, after all.
Don't get me wrong, I'm in favor of these places paying taxes on all the money they've got sitting around, but isn't it wrong to cheer for the legislature trying to find yet more and more and more cash?
__________________ Questions are a burden
and answers a prison
for oneself.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Re: Taxachusetts to target college's for "revenue"
I don't see why anyone is tax emempt. You get money you pay taxes. That applies to me. And oil companies. And churches. And colleges. Colleges especially, they're mostly liberal bastions who want everyone else to pay more taxes for the liberal causes they typically espouse. It's easy to support programs when you don't have to pay for them.
Re: Taxachusetts to target college's for "revenue"
Quote:
Originally Posted by a.paul
I'm a little shocked that RW would be in favor of the Mass legislature trolling for new ways to take money from more people. It's not going to change what they try to take from him, after all.
Don't get me wrong, I'm in favor of these places paying taxes on all the money they've got sitting around, but isn't it wrong to cheer for the legislature trying to find yet more and more and more cash?
Oh, I'd prefer that taxes be low for everyone. I also know that the state's rape of someone else's pocket, surely won't line mine. I just wanted to point out how these "non-profits" are swimming in tax free cash, while the suits in capitol hill look for new ways to squeeze water out of the rocks that are the working man & woman.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897