Democrats Call For Investigation Of Clarence Thomas - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
Men's Apparel Jerseys Hats Novelties Throwback Women's Youth
 
REGISTER FOR PATSFANS.COM

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!


Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-03-2011, 08:00 PM   #1
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,335
My Mood: Mellow
Default Democrats Call For Investigation Of Clarence Thomas

Democrats Call For Investigation Of Clarence Thomas | Neon Tommy

The Huffington Post reports:

“Democratic lawmakers on Thursday called for a federal investigation into Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' failure to report hundreds of thousands of dollars on annual financial disclosure forms.”

Thomas failed to disclose his wife’s income on federal forms for 13 years. She “had hundreds of thousands of dollars of income from conservative organizations, including roughly $700,000 from the Heritage Foundation between 2003 and 2007.”

The LA Times reports:

“Thomas reported ‘none’ in answering specific questions about ‘spousal non-investment income’ on annual forms – answers expressly made ‘subject to civil and criminal sanctions.’” The purpose of the financial disclosure forms is to provide information as to possible conflicts of interest. The groups giving money to Virginia Thomas were groups that “had expressed direct interest in the outcome of cases that came before her husband, including Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission, in which the court in 2010 struck down limitations on corporate contributions to elections.”

Rather than obligatorily recusing himself from a case in which he might not have been impartial, he chose to hide the possible conflicts of interest and remain on the case.
Patters is offline   Reply With Quote
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 10-03-2011, 08:03 PM   #2
----> Iron Mod <----
 
IcyPatriot's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 31,445
My Mood: Bored
Default Re: Democrats Call For Investigation Of Clarence Thomas

More Public Corruption...Clarence Thomas fails to report $686K of wife's income..

Thread by Darryl in January.
IcyPatriot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 08:05 PM   #3
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,036
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Democrats Call For Investigation Of Clarence Thomas

Funny he reported the income to the IRS. Case closed.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
patsfan13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 08:16 PM   #4
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,335
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: Democrats Call For Investigation Of Clarence Thomas

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsfan13 View Post
Funny he reported the income to the IRS. Case closed.
If that's true, then I think it supports the contention he was breaking the law to hide his conflict of interest. If he knew enough to report it to the IRS, then he was clearly aware of what he was doing. Hope there's an investigation, but that won't happen with the conservative Holder as AG.

Seems like a coverup to me:

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan...osure-20110122

Between 2003 and 2007, Virginia Thomas, a longtime conservative activist, earned $686,589 from the Heritage Foundation, according to a Common Cause review of the foundation's IRS records. Thomas failed to note the income in his Supreme Court financial disclosure forms for those years, instead checking a box labeled "none" where "spousal noninvestment income" would be disclosed.
Patters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 08:23 PM   #5
Banned
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,114
Default Re: Democrats Call For Investigation Of Clarence Thomas

The racists on the left already brought this up several months ago.
Wolfpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 08:25 PM   #6
Moderator
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,036
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Democrats Call For Investigation Of Clarence Thomas

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patters View Post
If that's true, then I think it supports the contention he was breaking the law to hide his conflict of interest. If he knew enough to report it to the IRS, then he was clearly aware of what he was doing. Hope there's an investigation, but that won't happen with the conservative Holder as AG.

Seems like a coverup to me:

Clarence Thomas failed to report wife's income, watchdog says - Los Angeles Times

Between 2003 and 2007, Virginia Thomas, a longtime conservative activist, earned $686,589 from the Heritage Foundation, according to a Common Cause review of the foundation's IRS records. Thomas failed to note the income in his Supreme Court financial disclosure forms for those years, instead checking a box labeled "none" where "spousal noninvestment income" would be disclosed.



Really?
His wife doesn't have freedom of speech in her career because he is on the court?

Should she stay pregnant and barefoot in the kitchen while she is at it?

Her activities at Heritage was common knowledge their income was reported to the government, if there was a form that wasn't filled out correctly that was an oversight since demonstrably there was no attempt to hide the income from the government as it was reported to the IRS as opposed to tax cheats like C Rangel who hid income on his forms and didn't report the income to the IRS. I don't recall your support for investigation into Rangel's cheating his fellow taxpayers.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
patsfan13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 08:34 PM   #7
Moderator
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16,335
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: Democrats Call For Investigation Of Clarence Thomas

Quote:
Originally Posted by patsfan13 View Post
Really?
His wife doesn't have freedom of speech in her career because he is on the court?

Should she stay pregnant and barefoot in the kitchen while she is at it?

Her activities at Heritage was common knowledge their income was reported to the government, if there was a form that wasn't filled out correctly that was an oversight since demonstrably there was no attempt to hide the income from the government as it was reported to the IRS as opposed to tax cheats like C Rangel who hid income on his forms and didn't report the income to the IRS. I don't recall your support for investigation into Rangel's cheating his fellow taxpayers.
I was never against investigating Rangel. I try to be fairly consistent in calling for greater transparency. Given the important ethical considerations of Thomas' job, I think an investigation is warranted. After all, the disclosure form is simple, he's a bright guy, and by not disclosing it made it a little easier for him not to recuse himself from cases where there could be a conflict of interest.
Patters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 08:38 PM   #8
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
DarrylS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a very special place
Posts: 36,123
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Re: Democrats Call For Investigation Of Clarence Thomas

The laws on conflict of interest, i.e. ethics violations, are very specific and govern how judges should act..

Attending retreats sponsored by the Koch Brothers raises eyebrows.. and an obvious appearance of impropriety..

From the code.. there is no commentary on race here, even though there are those who want to inject such..

Anybody who claims to be associated with any court system, knows how sacred these rules are..

Code of Conduct for United States Judges

Quote:
Canon 2A. An appearance of impropriety occurs when reasonable minds, with knowledge of all the relevant circumstances disclosed by a reasonable inquiry, would conclude that the judge’s honesty, integrity, impartiality, temperament, or fitness to serve as a judge is impaired. Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conduct by judges. A judge must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety. This prohibition applies to both professional and personal conduct. A judge must expect to be the subject of constant public scrutiny and accept freely and willingly restrictions that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinary citizen. Because it is not practicable to list all prohibited acts, the prohibition is necessarily cast in general terms that extend to conduct by judges that is harmful although not specifically mentioned in the Code. Actual improprieties under this standard include violations of law, court rules, or other specific provisions of this Code.
When a judge should recuse themselve in a matter before them..

Quote:
C) Disqualification.
(1) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances in which:
(a)the judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding;
(b)the judge served as a lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom the judge previously practiced law served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge or lawyer has been a material witness;
(c)the judge knows that the judge, individually or as a fiduciary, or the judge’s spouse or minor child residing in the judge’s household, has a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or any other interest that could be affected substantially by the outcome of the proceeding;
(d)the judge or the judge’s spouse, or a person related to either within the third degree of relationship, or the spouse of such a person is:
(i) a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, or trustee of a party;

(ii) acting as a lawyer in the proceeding;
(iii) known by the judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding; or
(iv) to the judge’s knowledge likely to be a material witness in the proceeding;
__________________
"Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
DarrylS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 08:40 PM   #9
Banned
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,114
Default Re: Democrats Call For Investigation Of Clarence Thomas

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patters View Post
I was never against investigating Rangel. I try to be fairly consistent in calling for greater transparency. Given the important ethical considerations of Thomas' job, I think an investigation is warranted. After all, the disclosure form is simple, he's a bright guy, and by not disclosing it made it a little easier for him not to recuse himself from cases where there could be a conflict of interest.
I'll ask you the same question I asked Darryl when he harped on the same subject several months ago:

Which cases did Clarence Thomas rule on where you think his impartiality was compromised?

For some reason, no one ever answers me when I ask that.
Wolfpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 08:45 PM   #10
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
DarrylS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a very special place
Posts: 36,123
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Re: Democrats Call For Investigation Of Clarence Thomas

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfpack View Post
I'll ask you the same question I asked Darryl when he harped on the same subject several months ago:

Which cases did Clarence Thomas rule on where you think his impartiality was compromised?

For some reason, no one ever answers me when I ask that.
Read response #8 above, anyone involved with the court systems is well aware of ethics violations.. and that thread clearly articulates some of the issues..

It is very clear.. he went to a retreat with the Koch Brothers and regarding his wife who is part of the Heritage Foundation..

Quote:
the judge or the judge’s spouse, or a person related to either within the third degree of relationship, or the spouse of such a person is:
(i) a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, or trustee of a party
;

When you become a judge, the standards as to what you can and cannot do.. change quite a bit. If you spend time in court systems, judges recuse themselves all of the time due to a potential conflict of interest.
__________________
"Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
DarrylS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sponsored Links



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Blue Nightmare: Clarence Thomas and the Amendment of Doom patsfan13 Political Discussion 56 09-06-2011 08:11 AM
More Public Corruption...Clarence Thomas fails to report $686K of wife's income.. DarrylS Political Discussion 95 01-28-2011 12:47 PM
Clarence Thomas on Freedon of Speech patsfan13 Political Discussion 27 02-05-2010 02:14 PM
If you don't like ObamaCARE, Democrats call you MOB NEPatriot Political Discussion 2 08-06-2009 11:27 AM
Clarence Thomas: Pray for George Bush mikey Political Discussion 1 05-22-2006 05:40 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563