07-13-2011, 11:00 AM
|
#1
|
|
In the Starting Line-up
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,257
My Mood:
|
Big Coal: Inbreeding, Not Mining, to Blame for Birth Defects
Big Coal: Inbreeding, Not Mining, to Blame for Birth Defects | Mother Jones
Quote:
Last month, when coal execs read the report linking birth defects to mountaintop removal mining, they weren't exactly thrilled. One rebuttal, penned by four attorneys with the firm Crowell & Moring, which represents the National Mining Association, accused the study's authors of using cherry-picked and misleading data. But that apparently wasn't convincing enough, so they went a step further and employed a discredited stereotype about inbreeding in West Virginia.
"The study failed to account for consanquinity [sic], one of the most prominent sources of birth defects," the attorneys' statement said. It then went on to advertise the firm's services to coal companies looking to "counter unfounded claims of injury or disease" from potential lawsuits sparked by the study.
|
Way to stay classy Big Coal!
|
|
|