ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Between 320 and 500 million spent on Military Marching Bands...
Not sure of the exact number it is reported that somewhere in the middle is the truth, Congresswoman McCollum added an amendment to the recent defense bill limiting this expenditure to 200 million..
McCollum is also the congresswoman who wanted to limit expenditures on NASCAR advertising.. thank goodness for the fiscally responsible democrats to come up with such a concrete idea.
Do we need 4600 full time army men and women to fulfill this function??.. that is 4600 soldiers in the Army alone that we will be paying a pension to for life after 20 years..
Today, the House of Representatives passed Congresswoman Betty McCollum's (MN-04) amendment (#153) to reduce the Department of Defense's spending on military musical bands by $120 million. Adopted as part of the fiscal year 2012 defense authorization bill (H.R. 1540), this amendment will cap Pentagon spending on military bands at $200 million. In Fiscal Year 2011, the Department of Defense estimates will spend $320 million on its music programs.
The Army currently has over 100 bands employing 4,600 full-time professional musicians and support staff. The National Guard, Air Force, and Navy also have dozens of bands with full-time musicians. Over the years, the number of bands and their cost to taxpayers has continued to grow, in part because Congress conducts no oversight over this portion of the budget.
__________________ "Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Between 320 and 500 million spent on Military Marching Bands...
This is one of those things where I have to wonder if Congress should really get involved. I'm sure the Army is quite aware that it would have that many more infantry troops or logistics troops or whatever troops if it cut back on band members, yet this is the decision they arrived at. Who's more qualified to make it?
__________________
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob everyone.
Re: Between 320 and 500 million spent on Military Marching Bands...
It seems that if the military has to cut back(Oh the horrors), they need to look at everything.. 4600 band members in the Army is nice, but is it a necessary???. Think of the legacy costs for playing in a band.
One of the issues in this defense budget is an appropriation to dig up dead marines remains in Lybia and have them returned to the US for proper burial.
The military is the proverbial golden very fat calf.
__________________ "Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
Re: Between 320 and 500 million spent on Military Marching Bands...
Agreed.
Part of that is for trumpet players to play taps at fuernals of vets. Retired military is starting to fill in when active duty soldiers aren't available.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
Re: Between 320 and 500 million spent on Military Marching Bands...
Quote:
Originally Posted by patsfan13
Agreed.
Part of that is for trumpet players to play taps at fuernals of vets. Retired military is starting to fill in when active duty soldiers aren't available.
Bugle, no?
There's actually a shortage of able buglers. They often resort to recording now. (story in the last couple years in the WSJ's middle column -- which, btw, is worth perusing for those who don't read the journal regularly -- very eclectic)
Re: Between 320 and 500 million spent on Military Marching Bands...
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicowalker
Bugle, no?
There's actually a shortage of able buglers. They often resort to recording now. (story in the last couple years in the WSJ's middle column -- which, btw, is worth perusing for those who don't read the journal regularly -- very eclectic)
Correct not valves on bugles, M Davis on the brain.
__________________
"Some guys play in all-star games, some guys don't. I don't know who picks all those all-star teams. In all honesty, I don't know who picks the combine, for that matter," Belichick said. "How does (Miami-Ohio offensive lineman Brandon) Brooks not get invited to the combine? How did Vollmer not get invited to the combine? I don't know. We can't really worry about that. We just have to try to evaluate them the best we can."
Re: Between 320 and 500 million spent on Military Marching Bands...
I'm sure there are tons of individual spending issues we'd find in all departments of the government. I don't mind the congress limiting the spending. I just don't know the ins and outs of marching bands in the military. Is $200 million a lot, a little, enough? I couldn't tell you. Generally speaking, cutting spending when we're broke is a good thing.
As for advertising during Nascar, um, who cares? When marketing you try to spend your dollars in a fashion that best hits your target audience. If you're marketing Depends, you might not want to pay for ads during the X Games for example. However, if you're the military, you might want to target Nascar. Sporting events are probably more in line with the military's target demographic than is something being shown on Lifetime.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897