ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
I didn't realize it before but it is the lawyer, not the expert who is on the hook for 'frivolous claim'
>>>>Significantly, the Certificate of Merit rules require only that the plaintiff attorney — not the actual expert — sign the Certificate. The requirement exposes the signing plaintiff attorney to sanctions under state law (the equivalent of the federal court's Rule 11 sanctions).<<<<
I do like the idea of holding attorneys responsible as well. I just wonder how much that will be enforced, if attorneys are in charge of determining whom to sanction.
(and my point / issue about access is that, no matter what, when you startto put negative incentives in place, you need to be careful about how the policy is crafted. By their very purpose, these sanctions will cause fewer cases to be taken -- so the question remains how to structure it so that frivolous cases are minimized while preserving access for the legit cases.)
Last edited by chicowalker; 06-04-2011 at 10:40 AM..
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98