'Handcuffed by policy': Fire crews watch man die - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Like Tree3Likes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-01-2011, 12:56 PM   #11
All Pro Poster
 
Mrs.PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,251
My Mood: Amazed
Default Re: 'Handcuffed by policy': Fire crews watch man die

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsSB42 View Post

Was he looking for help one last time and when it didn't come he gave into his demons?
Possibly....and just as possibly he was screaming obscenities and threatening to drown anyone who attempted to come near him.

I really, honestly, cannot understand why no one is outraged that this municipality sends it's rescue squads out into the world this unprepared. Obviously they are a town which is located near water - which means they are going to get water rescue type calls - to deny them water gear and protective clothing due to "budget cuts" is the height of disdain, not only for the welfare of their own employees but also for the health and safety of their entire town, any one of which may need rescuing at some point in time.
chicowalker likes this.

Last edited by Mrs.PatsFanInVa; 06-01-2011 at 01:00 PM..
Mrs.PatsFanInVa is online now   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 06-01-2011, 01:24 PM   #12
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 
PatsWSB47's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,297
Default Re: 'Handcuffed by policy': Fire crews watch man die

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs.PatsFanInVa View Post
Possibly....and just as possibly he was screaming obscenities and threatening to drown anyone who attempted to come near him.

I really, honestly, cannot understand why no one is outraged that this municipality sends it's rescue squads out into the world this unprepared. Obviously they are a town which is located near water - which means they are going to get water rescue type calls - to deny them water gear and protective clothing due to "budget cuts" is the height of disdain, not only for the welfare of their own employees but also for the health and safety of their entire town, any one of which may need rescuing at some point in time.
Maybe the report is playing up an angle and withed some facts. I really hope you're right because it's hard for me to fathom the alternative. Life and death situations are not the time to protest or play chicken with budgets. Clearly proper funding is a necessity and it would be as if not more wrong to dare or require rescuers to work in more dangerous situations(that could be made less dangerous) as it would be for rescuers to refuse because of policy.

Last edited by PatsWSB47; 06-01-2011 at 01:25 PM..
PatsWSB47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2011, 01:36 PM   #13
Hall of Fame Poster
 
Real World's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 25,165
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: 'Handcuffed by policy': Fire crews watch man die

Was that San Franfreakshow? Maybe if they weren't paying for illegals by way of their sanctuary status they'd have the funds to buy a couple of cold water suits. Just sayin...

If the guy wanted to end his life, so be it. While I personally wish people wouldn't do so, I think all free adult human beings do have the right to.

I don't know the specifics about SF's financial problems, but generally speaking, most municipalities are broke. When you're broke, cuts have to be made. It could be that the place in question looked at the money needed to maintain water rescue, versus the actual amount of water rescues in recent years, and determined it wasn't an efficient use of resources. I'm guessing here. The point is that you can't always protect or account for everything, and sometimes difficult decisions have to be made.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him."
Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Real World is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2011, 01:43 PM   #14
All Pro Poster
 
Mrs.PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,251
My Mood: Amazed
Default Re: 'Handcuffed by policy': Fire crews watch man die

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsSB42 View Post
Maybe the report is playing up an angle and withed some facts. I really hope you're right because it's hard for me to fathom the alternative. Life and death situations are not the time to protest or play chicken with budgets. Clearly proper funding is a necessity and it would be as if not more wrong to dare or require rescuers to work in more dangerous situations(that could be made less dangerous) as it would be for rescuers to refuse because of policy.
The way I read it was that they rewrote the policy in 2009 saying that there would be no more water rescues because there was no longer any protective gear, equipment or training being provided. There wasn't any protesting going on - the town had already cut the budget, done away with the training and equipment and policy was written that they didn't perform water rescues any longer.

Interim Alameda Fire Chief Mike D'Orazi said that due to 2009 budget cuts his crews did not have the training or cold-water gear to go into the water.

As for police, they didn't have the gear for the cold water and couldn't risk being pulled under.

"Certainly this was tragic, but police officers are tasked with ensuring public safety, including the safety of personnel who are sent to try to resolve these kinds of situations," Alameda police Lt. Sean Lynch said.



The town has since revised their policy - and their budget. A day late for this guy, however.

A man drowned off Crown Beach Monday while fire crews and police stood by watching helplessly as rules and regulations prevented them from getting into the water. Now, the city plans to recertify firefighters for water rescues.

Before, Alameda police and fire had to rely on the U.S. Coast Guard for water rescues. It was that way for two years, since budget cuts forced the city's fire boat out of the water and land-based water rescues along with it.

The mayor and fire chief now say the rescue program will be reinstated and the city will spend the $20,000 to $40,000 to certify 16 firefighters in land-based water rescue tactics.

Gilmore said the first responders are devastated about what happened Monday. Being forced to stand and do nothing was against their instincts
.


Alameda agrees to reinstate water rescue training after man drowns at Crown Beach | abc7news.com
Mrs.PatsFanInVa is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2011, 01:45 PM   #15
All Pro Poster
 
Mrs.PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,251
My Mood: Amazed
Default Re: 'Handcuffed by policy': Fire crews watch man die

Quote:
Originally Posted by Real World View Post
Was that San Franfreakshow? Maybe if they weren't paying for illegals by way of their sanctuary status they'd have the funds to buy a couple of cold water suits. Just sayin...
Nope, sorry, Alameda. San Francisco takes care of it's own.


The San Francisco Fire Department is one of the few in the Bay Area that certifies some of its personnel for water rescues. The department's spokeswoman says about 300 firefighters are certified. They are needed about once a week to help someone in the bay or ocean. Water rescue crews are equipped with boats, wet suits, paddle boards and other gear.
Mrs.PatsFanInVa is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2011, 02:51 PM   #16
All Pro Poster
 
wistahpatsfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15,621
Default Re: 'Handcuffed by policy': Fire crews watch man die

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs.PatsFanInVa View Post
I know it's tempting to blame it on the fire department - or the bystanders....It's also easy to say, "I wouldn't have stood by...." but the truth is the blame, if there is blame to be placed, belongs squarely on the budget cuts which were made...

...This is unfortunate, this is sad and this is a direct result of not having the right gear or the right training.
It is a direct result of many things. While some blame can be placed there, the government budget cuts are not the sole reason this happened. The man trying to kill himself in the water was the main reason. The people standing idly by- including those in uniform- are another reason. Anybody could have done something, but for a variety of reasons and excuses, chose to do nothing.

Everyone has a choice. The suicidee could have taken his meds that day. Any one or two of the rescue personnel could have said, "Screw the policy. I'm going in!" And any of the bystanders could have helped them.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
wistahpatsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2011, 03:44 PM   #17
All Pro Poster
 
Mrs.PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 12,251
My Mood: Amazed
Default Re: 'Handcuffed by policy': Fire crews watch man die

Quote:
Originally Posted by wistahpatsfan View Post
Everyone has a choice. The suicidee could have taken his meds that day. Any one or two of the rescue personnel could have said, "Screw the policy. I'm going in!" And any of the bystanders could have helped them.
And any one of them could have died trying.....

I did hear on the news earlier that the man who drowned weighed 270 pounds....that right there would be a deterrent for many people....not because they don't like overweight people but because you always weigh your chances of survival and success when you are faced with a dangerous situation - the fact is, the more someone outweighs you the more likely it is that you will A) not succeed in rescuing them and B) you will die trying.

One of the reasons people will jump in a river or lake to save a drowning child is because they instinctively know that that child poses little danger to themselves - even if the kid fights them (and drowning people fight - even the ones who want to be saved) they can be easily overpowered and quickly dragged to safety.....not so a 270 pound man who's intent on killing himself.

Plus, there's something about crowd mentality that prevents individuals from acting alone. Chances are if one or two people had come across this man drowning one of them would have done something and the other would have assisted......when there is a crowd of people the individuals who make up the crowd wait for someone else to "do something," and if one of them does not - the rest will not act, either. No one wants to be the first one or the only one. Numerous studies back this up.

For all we know the cops and firefighters were keeping people out of the water in order to assure that no one else lost their life in what they knew was going to be a futile attempt. It seems they were waiting for the Coast Guard who were the ones responsible for water rescues - but the water was too shallow for their boat and their one helicopter was tied up in use some place else. Maybe they thought they'd show up in time.

Maybe lots of things - but I blame no one for not attempting what would have, most likely, been a disasterous attempt at a rescue without the proper training and equipment.
Mrs.PatsFanInVa is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2011, 05:57 PM   #18
All Pro Poster
 
Holy Diver's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Big Frisco
Posts: 10,798
My Mood: Angelic
Default Re: 'Handcuffed by policy': Fire crews watch man die

Alameda is the poster town for what happens when right wing policy and the real real world shake out.


This goes WAY back to 1978 and Prop 13 (for thos eof you NON Cali people who believe this is a liberal haven) This has everything to do with property taxes, and the super majority it takes to raise them.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Califor...ition_13_(1978)


This proposition has been slowly destroying Alameda for years. The High Schools can't afford sports, or musicm, and get cleaned by a single janitor every OTHER day.

California's Budget Crisis: The Effects of Prop 13 - TIME




what a wonderful land we live in, that produces twice the world's weapons, six times the worlds wars, screws the poor and gives breaks to rich people.



we should all be so proud of what we have become. The A-holes of the planet Earth.
Holy Diver is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
George Bush protesters handcuffed and strip-searched mikey Political Discussion 34 07-25-2006 01:21 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC