100% U.S. Non-Intervention - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
NEWS
|
FORUM
|
PHOTOS
|
VIDEOS
|
FULL STATS DATABASE
|
PODCAST
|
RUMOR MILL
Get Social With PatsFans.com
Early Roster Projection
Ryan's Journey Started Early
POST DRAFT PODCAST

Go Back   New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard > Off Topic Forums > Political Discussion
Forgot Password? Join PatsFans.com!
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read Chat Room

WELCOME TO OUR FORUM HERE AT PATSFANS.COM!
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW

Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-2011, 05:26 AM   #1
All Pro Poster
 
PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,635
My Mood: Angelic
Default 100% U.S. Non-Intervention

Who favors 100% U.S. millitary non-intervention? Please weigh in here. Does anyone here favor the immediate retraction of all U.S. force to within our territory, territorial/perhaps international waters, and territorial/international airspace?

By the way, I stipulate that "Bush is the same as Obama" on this count. Neither favored 100% non-intervention.

The question is, do you?

PFnV
PatsFanInVa is online now   Reply With Quote
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!

Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account
including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.

NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98

Updated 07/08/11

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Old 03-30-2011, 06:03 AM   #2
PatsFans.com Supporter
 
DarrylS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a very special place
Posts: 36,169
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Re: 100% U.S. Non-Intervention

As a long time pacifist, I favor closing out most of our 700 overseas bases, particularly the ones that have no strategic value. I favor withdrawal from Afghanistan, Iraq and not getting involved in Libya.

The reality is at over 2 billion dollars a week for these wars has wrecked out economy.. this along with the tremendous "legacy costs" for our military will cause economic harm on our budget for years to come. No one ever talks about the needs of our veterans systems of care for the future.. this costs will be tremendous.
__________________
"Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
DarrylS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 06:39 AM   #3
Hall of Fame Poster
 
PatriotsReign's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 22,638
Default Re: 100% U.S. Non-Intervention

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInVa View Post
Who favors 100% U.S. millitary non-intervention? Please weigh in here. Does anyone here favor the immediate retraction of all U.S. force to within our territory, territorial/perhaps international waters, and territorial/international airspace?

By the way, I stipulate that "Bush is the same as Obama" on this count. Neither favored 100% non-intervention.

The question is, do you?

PFnV
It depends on your definition of "non-intervention". By your definition, would it be acceptable for us to retaliate if we were attacked by a foreign terrorist group?

I don't believe it has to be "all or nothing" and the fact is, "Yes or No" aren't the only relevant answers to your question.

I'm all for closing most of our foreign bases, but it doesn't have be all of them. If we have 700 of them, then let's start by cutting that number to 100. If we just walk away from all that we are now involved in, what are the potential negative consequences? I would LOVE to see ALL our troops come home from Iraq & Afghanistan, but is that the best thing for us to do from any perspective (national or international)?
__________________
"No one walking this earth knows what is truly righteous"

Last edited by PatriotsReign; 03-30-2011 at 06:40 AM..
PatriotsReign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 06:54 AM   #4
Look Up, It's Amazing
 
Harry Boy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 33,816
Default Re: 100% U.S. Non-Intervention

It's the reason the world hates us, we pretend to be worldly do-gooders saving humanity when in all reality we are constantly killing somebody and getting our own troops killed, we should only go to war to defend and protect OUR OWN.

We should be concentrating on The Invasion Of America by illegal aliens and the Raping Of The American People by The Drunks, The Sex Perverts, The Thieves, The Racists and all of the other rotten PIGS that we elect to run our country.

The starry eyed ballwashing liberal fools thought they were finally getting their dreamboat president when they voted for this sap Obama all they got was another GW Bush.

OUR ENEMY WILL BE BACK YOU CAN BET ON IT (I call them our enemy it isn't politically correct to mention them we don't want to offend them)

Our troops should be grought home from all of Obama's wars, PROTECT OUR OWN BORDERS.

WHERE DID ALL THE PROFESSIONAL WAR PROTESTERS GO--------
__________________
Harry Boy (Genius)

In The Absence Of Law And Order Society Will Surely Destroy Itself
Harry Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 07:41 AM   #5
All Pro Poster
 
PatsFanInVa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,635
My Mood: Angelic
Default Re: 100% U.S. Non-Intervention

I can respect both Darryl's and PR's points of view on this. I basically am closer to PR's position. PR, in answer to your question, let's say one can counter-strike if there's a strike on your own soil, as in 9/11. But no grab-and-hold campaign against 2 sovereign nations that didn't do it -- perhaps you work with the nations sheltering the bad guys. Perhaps you pressure them. Perhaps if all else fails you announce a retaliatory policy where you whack them to the tune of an equivalently bloody nose. But you can't very well justify occupation of nation-states in reaction to a criminal gang, in this just-short-of-pacifist policy statement.

I cannot respect Harry's "position" such as it is, since it seems to arise solely from the part of the brain we share with reptiles (i.e., no cognition seems to have gone into it, just a reflex fear/hate response to whatever he's identified as a an enemy or a food source.)

Regardless of what your cardboard-cutout prototypical political betes noire "thought", Harry, what do you think? (and by the way, Obama ran right down the center, saying "wrong war," not "no war." You know this, and so do the peaceniks who held their noses and voted for him anyway.)

But again, Harry, what do you think?

Should we have a policy of 100% non-intervention?

PFnV

Last edited by PatsFanInVa; 03-30-2011 at 07:43 AM..
PatsFanInVa is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 08:06 AM   #6
Look Up, It's Amazing
 
Harry Boy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 33,816
Default Re: 100% U.S. Non-Intervention

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInVa View Post
But again, Harry, what do you think?

Should we have a policy of 100% non-intervention?

PFnV
......Yes......
__________________
Harry Boy (Genius)

In The Absence Of Law And Order Society Will Surely Destroy Itself
Harry Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 08:18 AM   #7
Hall of Fame Poster
 
PatriotsReign's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 22,638
Default Re: 100% U.S. Non-Intervention

Quote:
Originally Posted by PatsFanInVa View Post
I can respect both Darryl's and PR's points of view on this. I basically am closer to PR's position. PR, in answer to your question, let's say one can counter-strike if there's a strike on your own soil, as in 9/11. But no grab-and-hold campaign against 2 sovereign nations that didn't do it -- perhaps you work with the nations sheltering the bad guys. Perhaps you pressure them. Perhaps if all else fails you announce a retaliatory policy where you whack them to the tune of an equivalently bloody nose. But you can't very well justify occupation of nation-states in reaction to a criminal gang, in this just-short-of-pacifist policy statement.

PFnV
I agree with your thoughts on attacking/holding foreign nations accountable for terrorists attacks. Terrorists don't represent nations. And working with countries for their help with terrorism is a very good idea. It shows respect rather taking a "bully-approach"...and I believe we need more of that.
__________________
"No one walking this earth knows what is truly righteous"

Last edited by PatriotsReign; 03-30-2011 at 08:19 AM..
PatriotsReign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 09:38 AM   #8
Look Up, It's Amazing
 
Harry Boy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 33,816
Default Re: 100% U.S. Non-Intervention

I'm sorry, I'm not as nice as most people when I see these bastards in their suit and ties sitting behind their desks sending our young people off to war to be killed for some half ass country inhabited by a culture that thrives on killing each other.

PROTECT AMERICA AND IT'S PEOPLE GOD DAMN THE REST OF THE WORLD THEY ALL HATE US ANYWAY, LET CHINA POLICE THE SAVAGES IN THE MIDDLE EAST.

BRING OUR TROOPS HOME FROM AROUND THE WORLD THEN PUT THEM ON GUARD DUTY ON ALL OF OUR BORDERS, SEA PORTS AND AIRPORTS PROFILE ALL PEOPLE ENTERING THIS COUNTRY, NEVER NEVER ALLOW ANOTHER 9/11 WE LIVE IN A TOTALLY DIFFERENT WORLD THAN WE DID 50 YEARS AGO THE OCEANS NO LONGER PROTECT US THE WORLD IS MUCH SMALLER AND YOU CAN REST ASSURED THEY WILL BE BACK TO KILL MORE OF US IF WE KEEP OUR HEADS IN THE SAND AND TRY TO DENY THEY EXIST.

GOD WILLING DEATH TO AMERICA THE GREAT SATAN (they'll be back"


__________________
Harry Boy (Genius)

In The Absence Of Law And Order Society Will Surely Destroy Itself
Harry Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 10:17 AM   #9
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brighton, MA
Posts: 5,742
Default Re: 100% U.S. Non-Intervention

Not only am I against a complete non-interventionist policy, I've been rethinking my stance on Iraq lately. How can anyone be certain that this wave of democracy in the ME wasn't somehow triggered by his Bumbling?
__________________
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob everyone.
sdaniels7114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 10:28 AM   #10
Look Up, It's Amazing
 
Harry Boy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 33,816
Default Re: 100% U.S. Non-Intervention

Barack Hussein Obama is a poltically correct JOKE, Geraldine Ferarro had the courage to stand up to it and she was sent to the woodshed by the slobbering left wing liberals for doing so, now we all have to pay, we can only pray that the clown doesn't cause WWIII or bring about another 9/11, he's done more harm to this country in two years than GW Bush or even Jimmy Carter could do in a lifetime.


__________________
Harry Boy (Genius)

In The Absence Of Law And Order Society Will Surely Destroy Itself
Harry Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dems, some in GOP question McCain's intervention reflexblue Political Discussion 13 09-26-2008 12:30 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC