Titus Pullo

Actually, you said there was a "lack of knowledge by many," and then punted to technology as some kind of silver bullet. It's true you didn't answer the question very clearly.

Either way, you seem to wanna deflect from the direct challenge presented to you.

I've noticed this before from you, when your argument is out of ammunition and still hasn't hit its target.

You deny that supply is a problem if only we drilled and spent more to do so. Unfortunately, that ploy is barely half true. Supply will remain a problem, no matter how many billions of dollars companies throw into drilling deeper, or strip mining wider. This is kinda the point being made by the International Monetary Fund, in corroboration with the Pentagon, the IEA, and the U.S. Dept. of Energy.

But, somehow, people like you insist you know better, here on a football Web site.

Right. When you can't answer a very clear question, pretend your debate opponent can't understand your irrelevant prose.

I'll ask it again, a different way: ... If there is "plenty" of oil, why the need to justify all those alternatives? Which is it? Plenty of oil, or not plenty of oil?