ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Re: Why I am not worried about Japan’s nuclear reactors.
This is the OP
Originally Posted by patsfan13
The me in the title does NOT refer to patsfan13, it refers to Dr Josef Oehmen, a research scientist at MIT. This is the best explanation/description I have seen about what is happening at the Fukushima reactor site.
It is also a primer on how this plant was designed.
I'm not sure how we missed it - but this guy - the one with the "best explanation/description seen about what was happening at the Fukushima reactor site???
He was a fraud.
The linked to article is gone - his blog has been moved - and his story's been told.....time to tell it here, I think.
On 13 March, an essay entitled "Why I am not worried about Japan's nuclear reactors" appeared on a new and unknown blog. Within hours the post had gone viral – a testament to the power of hyperlinking and social media.
The article echoed across Facebook and Twitter, where CNBC's Jim Cramer recommended it as the "best piece on the nuke issue". The high-profile sites The Telegraph and Discover cited the essay and Business Insider reproduced it in full, with a headline proclaiming, "You Can Stop Worrying About A Radiation Disaster In Japan – Here's Why".
By 15 March, two articles in particular had emphasised that the author, Josef Oehmen – whom the original blog identified as a research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology – had no background in nuclear science: Salon published an article debunking the essay, and the blog Genius Now even questioned Oehmen's motives for writing.
Josef Oehmen readily admits that he is not a nuclear scientist. He says he has a PhD in mechanical engineering from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich. He currently works as a research scientist, studying risk management at MIT's Lean Advancement Initiative and, according to his online profile, he wrote his PhD thesis on supply-chain risk management with a focus on China. People who study risk management learn to identify and mitigate anything that might compromise a business's efficiency or profit.
Oehmen explains that his father worked for a national nuclear research centre in Germany, and that over the years he has built up a basic understanding of how nuclear power plants work.
On 11 March, Oehmen says he received a phone call from his cousin, Jason Morgan, who lives with his wife and daughter in Kawasaki, Japan, not too far from Tokyo. Morgan needed advice. He explained that his mother, panicked by the threat of a nuclear crisis in Japan, insisted that he return home to Australia. But Morgan, immersed in a frothing stew of conflicting media reports, could not decide whether he was in enough danger to merit an evacuation. So he did what anyone might do – he called up the best-informed person he knew to help him make sense of it all.
Oehmen told his cousin that he would need to do some research before he could offer any advice, and he began sifting through online articles. He says he was appalled to discover that "people had not the least bit of understanding about nuclear physics", and describes much of what he read as hyperbolic.
He turned to online resources like the website of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission to learn more about boiling water reactors – the type of reactors at Fukushima – and used that scientific context to evaluate the news reports and the threat to his cousin. Oehmen returned Morgan's call and, after explaining some of the mechanics of the nuclear reactors in Fukushima, said that in his opinion dangerous levels of radiation would not reach Kawasaki.
Morgan was relieved and asked Oehmen to write up an email he could send to his worried mother in Australia. Oehmen obliged and worked on the email from 10 pm on 12 March to 3 am the next morning. It was a long message with detailed and technical descriptions of how Fukushima's boiling water reactors work.
But instead of simply emailing the essay around the family, Morgan started up a new blog and posted his piece there so other family members and friends could access it. He also tweeted the article to the fewer than 50 followers he had at the time.
Later on that Sunday morning, Oehmen awoke to the incessant quivering of his cellphone, which was quickly filling up with messages. "Dude, check your email," read one text message from Morgan. The blog adaptation of Oehmen's email had gone viral, gaining more than 50,000 views.
"It hit me in the gut," Oehmen says. What he maintains was originally intended for a few family members was suddenly an internet phenomenon. "I wanted to be absolutely sure what I wrote was as accurate as possible so I wasn't adding to all the confusion," he says. So he contacted several people at MIT, including Richard Lester, head of the department of nuclear science and engineering. Lester worked with his department to set up a website run by MIT students in nuclear science and engineering with guidance from their professors. They revised and reposted Oehmen's original essay, editing it to ensure accuracy.
Using an online tool such as diffChecker to compare Oehmen's original essay with the version edited by the MIT's department of nuclear science, it appears that – with the exception of minor corrections – his explanations of how boiling water reactors work remains largely intact.
But Oehmen's predictions regarding radiation leakage have been cut. His original assertion that "there was and will *not* be any significant release of radioactivity from the damaged Japanese reactors" was bold even at the time he was writing – and has since proved incorrect. For anyone in and around the Fukushima reactors, the radiation is certainly "significant" – although nuclear experts have repeatedly stated Fukushima will not be another Chernobyl.
Oehmen's account of events suggests he wrote his essay with a very specific concern in mind: the radiation risk to his cousin in Kawasaki. He maintains that his missive was not written as an expert's account for the media: the original essay included no allusions to Oehmen's nuclear credentials and, as Salon and Genius Now quickly discovered, the simplest of Google searches could confirm that they were lacking.
Unfortunately for Oehmen, by the time anyone in the media had bothered to check his academic background two things had happened: first, his words had been widely reported as the best account of the unfolding events in Japan, and second, those events had begun to move in a direction that his original post had clearly declared impossible. Consequently, the revelation of the simple fact of Oehmen's education was treated as a fine piece of investigative journalism.
__________________ "The blade itself incites to deeds of violence."
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98