ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Maybe it's time to rethink the tax exempt status of religious organizations that allow molesters to operate for decades. Am I being reactionary?
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
I don't think churches should be tax exempt unless they can prove that they are contributing some sort of tangible welfare to the community (without religious prejudice). Even then, the tax break needs to be proportional to the amount of welfare provided; i.e. a canned goods drive in December is not worth $200,000. The government should not be subsidizing any religion; at least if one has a Jeffersonian view of American politics.
__________________
We get what we deserve.
------------------ “On a day when they could have had impact players David Terrell or Koren Robinson..they took Georgia defensive tackle Richard Seymour, who had 1 sacks last season in the pass-happy SEC and is too tall to play tackle at 6-6 and too slow to play defensive end. This genius move was followed by trading out of a spot where they could have gotten the last decent receiver in Robert Ferguson and settled for tackle Matt Light, who will not help any time soon.”
Aren't non profits tax exempt? If so, then wouldn't a church fall under the same guidelines more or less? I'd say non profits being taxed exempt is fine (generally speaking), and I'd figure the church would therefore be no different. In a general sense.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
churches provide valuable services to the community ... and when I say church i mean any and all religious institutions. If they were taxed they would provide less services to the disadvantaged and the government would then bear more responsibilities. I also don't think you can directly quantify their value as non-profits.
Religious institutions, arts, education ... any and all non profits make great contributions to society that are near impossible to quantify. then again look at countries that don't have religious institutions like we do here where any and all faiths are welcome to set up shop - I just don't see where a price tag can be put upon the benefits. The atheists kind of get screwed in it all but nothing is ever 100% except death and taxes as we all well know.
Kind of rambled that out ... hope it makes sense regarding my opinion.
Recently there has been a move for payment in lieu of taxes(PILOT) for many tax exempt institutions..
But time to rethink this whole thing, churches certainly get involved in politics and local races.. that line has completely blurred.
The other factor is non-profits are eating up many of our cities, in Boston Universities and Hospitals.. in Providence; RISD, Brown, Johnson and Wales and the big hospitals are taking over much of our city space.. all of which are tax exempt.
The catholic church also owns vast tracts of land often in prestigious locations which is not taxed...
Maybe they get break, but as they all use city services time to rethink this policy..
__________________ "Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anyone else".. tweet from Kurt Warner to Tom Brady.
Aren't non profits tax exempt? If so, then wouldn't a church fall under the same guidelines more or less?
There are a few differences: Most NPOs are required by law to detail their financial income and expenditures and to answer to someone.
Churches are not.
Most larger NPO organizations are required to publish their financial reports detailing their income and expenditure for the public. In many aspects they are similar to business entities though there are often significant differences. Both non-profit and for-profit entities must have board members, steering committee members, or trustees who owe the organization a fiduciary duty of loyalty and trust. A notable exception to this involves churches, which are often not required to disclose finances to anyone, including church members.
Aren't non profits tax exempt? If so, then wouldn't a church fall under the same guidelines more or less? I'd say non profits being taxed exempt is fine (generally speaking), and I'd figure the church would therefore be no different. In a general sense.
Non-profits are able to operate under a looser set of accounting rules, too.
I think the same argument--made stronger because the First Amendment isn't involved--can be made to treat so-called "non-profits" similar to a business whose business is, after all, service.
And have you seen some of the salaries of the executives of these "non profits"?
It's why I made the point to say "generally speaking". Clearly a NPO who's paying it's employees, or CEO, an outrageous sum wouldn't be one that I'd approve of. In a general sense, I have no issue with charitable, or not for profit organizations (churches, mosques, temples, etc. Salvation Army, Boys and Girls Clubs of America, etc.) being tax exempt. What I wouldn't be supportive of, is any type of blank check exemption that would allow these institutions to include any and all property they own/buy to fall under that exempted status. The specifics, as is the case with most everything, is what would matter to me. In terms of the general, and vague question of whether religious institutions (I prefer that to singling out churches) should be tax exempt, I say yes. A religious institution could never afford to pay the property taxes around here. Maybe what local governments could do, is add a 3rd classification in addition to the current residential and commercial, with a minimal rate applied. So instead of paying no taxes, an NPO class property would pay some sort of minimal amount.
One thing I hate is the tax exemption for colleges. I hate it because these scum sucking universities charge $40-50k per year in tuition, and gobble up tax free property at the same time. I believe Harvard has something like $16 billion in it's endowment fund. GROSS.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
One thing I hate is the tax exemption for colleges. I hate it because these scum sucking universities charge $40-50k per year in tuition, and gobble up tax free property at the same time. I believe Harvard has something like $16 billion in it's endowment fund. GROSS.
Meanwhile, in the UK they are rioting and pissing on statues of Churchill over charging tuition of up to 9,000 GBP.