Hi, I'm a Tea-Partier - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums

Titus Pullo · 10-29-2010, 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Real World

Absolutely. If you felt that the government was spending too much (it was), moving to control your life in ways you didn't like (always is), growing too large in size (it's pants haven't fit in decades), too powerful (Balco client for sure), etc. Then Absolutely.

and don't actually read, and instead parrot partisan talking points. ... then absolutely.

PatriotsReign · 10-29-2010, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titus Pullo

"I'm not a Bush supporter, but... "

"I'm not a war fan, but... "

"I'm not an Obama basher, but... "

"I'm not a racist, but... "

"I don't advocate privatization of everything, but... "

I find that whenever a poster with a history of right-leaning views starts a statement with a qualifier, rest assured he's about to offer further evidence that belies his pronouncement.

Your a member, but you assuming anything about another member and drawing conclusions is the reflection of a challenged intellect...but...

Titus Pullo · 10-29-2010, 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatriotsReign

Your a member, but you assuming anything about another member and drawing conclusions is the reflection of a challenged intellect...but...

I don't need to assume. Your body of work here is plenty enough.

PatriotsReign · 10-29-2010, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titus Pullo

I don't need to assume. Your body of work here is plenty enough.

Anyone who "attacks the poster" is just screaming...

"I don't know diddly sh1t"

Maybe you should just go back to planning your next "World Economic Summit" protest?

That's a question, not an attack. But you do seem like "the type"

Titus Pullo · 10-29-2010, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatriotsReign

Anyone who "attacks the poster" is just screaming...

"I don't know diddly sh1t"

Attacking posters. Ah yes. There is amusing irony here. Do you see it? If not, I'd be happy to rehash our origins, you and me.

This from the same "non-Tea Partier" who insisted I was some poster named Apple. I think you've displayed your level of "diddly" capacity here, in full, all over this forum.

PatriotsReign · 10-29-2010, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titus Pullo

Attacking posters. Ah yes. ... There is poetic irony here. Do you see it?

This from the same "non-Tea Partier" who insisted I was some poster named Apple. I think you've displayed your level of "diddly" capacity here, in full.

Hey, you forgot this part of my post

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatriotsReign

Maybe you should just go back to planning your next "World Economic Summit" protest?

That's a question, not an attack. But you do seem like "the type"

Well, are you that type of person Titus? Like most far-left libbies, even if you were, you wouldn't have the balls to admit it because World Economic Summit protesters are cowardly people.

Titus Pullo · 10-29-2010, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatriotsReign

Hey, you forgot this part of my post

Well, are you that type of person Titus? Like most far-left libbies, even if you were, you wouldn't have the balls to admit it because World Economic Summit protesters are cowardly people.

You mean like the French cowards who are rioting?

PatriotsReign · 10-29-2010, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titus Pullo

You mean like the French cowards who are rioting?

EXACTLY!!! By golly, I think you've got it!

Those loser/cowards are protesting over having to retire at 62 instead of 60! Why? Because they actually believe it's govt's job to "take care of them".

All countries are going to have to get used to the fact that they can't have everything they're used to having because there isn't enough money AND they're already taxed at the highest levels possible.

But you're right, they are cowards. Or are you referring to some other cowards?

Titus Pullo · 10-29-2010, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatriotsReign

EXACTLY!!! By golly, I think you've got it!

Those loser/cowards are protesting over having to retire at 62 instead of 60! Why? Because they actually believe it's govt's job to "take care of them".

All countries are going to have to get used to the fact that they can't have everything they're used to having because there isn't enough money AND they're already taxed at the highest levels possible.

But you're right, they are cowards. Or are you referring to some other cowards?

You have a very curious definition of the word coward, then. First you say a coward wouldn't admit being a protester. Then, you admit a protester is a coward. You're kinda all over the place.

You're really taking a beating this afternoon, Captain "not a tea partier, but..."
Streamline your message, or pick a new one.

PatriotsReign · 10-29-2010, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titus Pullo

You have a very curious definition of the word coward, then. First you say a coward wouldn't admit being a protester. Then, you admit a protester is a coward. You're kinda all over the place.

You're really taking a beating this afternoon, Captain "not a tea partier, but..."
Streamline your message, or pick a new one.

No...now listen very closely Titus the World Economic Summit protester

People who protest rarely admit to it, which make them cowards. And just like you're scared to answer my question.

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatriotsReign

Are you the "World Economic Summit" protest type?

Well, are ya punk?

You know them, they're the cowards that throw bags of human waste at police.