Tea Party Tundra Troubles - Page 3 - New England Patriots Forums

***Wolfpack*** · 10-22-2010, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackBauer

Another example of Wolfpack's dubious -- at best -- grasp of history.

Please feel free to provide a counter example.

Put up or shut up, Jack.

***Wolfpack*** · 10-22-2010, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by khayos

Right... he's #2 after Dewey (who lost). What a huge error.

I'm not so sure I agree. I did a Wiki check, and Dewey was a federal prosecutor and district attorney for several years before becoming governor of NY and winning the nomination in 1944. IMHO that trumps being a "community organizer" and state senator plus 4 years of voting "present" in the U.S. Senate.

***IcyPatriot*** · 10-22-2010, 03:30 PM

Okay what was the central theme of this thread?

***DarrylS*** · 10-22-2010, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patsfan13

Miller should focus on issues of jobs and the massive deficits and not be distracted by smears from the Murkowski RINO's.

All the statist have right now are smears they can't discuss their voting record and policies that are being rejected by the voters we see this nationally.

Statist makes no sense in this context.. did Erik provide you with the word of the day?????.. not sure it is even a word..

Statism (or etatism) is an ideology advocating the use of states to achieve goals, both economic and social

JackBauer · 10-22-2010, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolfpack

Please feel free to provide a counter example.

Put up or shut up, Jack.

Nah.

I'll just resort to your tried and true tactic: if you're really so ignorant of basic history, I shan't be taking the time to educate you. Go pick up an American History 101 textbook, you just might learn something.

JackBauer · 10-22-2010, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolfpack

IMHO that trumps being a "community organizer" and state senator plus 4 years of voting "present" in the U.S. Senate.

You would think that, obviously, since you actually seem to believe Senators can vote "present" in the US Senate.

JackBauer · 10-22-2010, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by khayos

Right... he's #2 after Dewey (who lost). What a huge error.

Incorrect.

khayos · 10-22-2010, 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackBauer

Incorrect.

Well color me convinced...

***Wolfpack*** · 10-22-2010, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackBauer

Nah.

I'll just resort to your tried and true tactic: if you're really so ignorant of basic history, I shan't be taking the time to educate you. Go pick up an American History 101 textbook, you just might learn something.

Wow. It's been a long time since I made someone look so foolish so easily!

Of course, as usual, you're not even man enough to admit you were wrong.

I'm very knowledgeable about American history, and that's how I know you're wrong. I challenged you to put up or shut up, Jack, and you weren't man enough to do either of those things!!

***Wolfpack*** · 10-22-2010, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackBauer

You would think that, obviously, since you actually seem to believe Senators can vote "present" in the US Senate.

Well I stand corrected! I had a brain fart, I was careless in my sentence and my post and I apologize for my error!

(See how easy it is to admit when you are wrong about something? Someday you may realize that when you make a mistake the easiest thing to do is just man up and admit you made a mistake. But you, with your childlike mind, can't even realize how you look so much more foolish when you defend an incorrect statement than you would just by saying "my bad").