The Roots of Obama's Rage - New England Patriots Forums

PatsFanInMaine · 09-25-2010, 11:32 AM

Should be some interesting reading.

How Obama Thinks - Forbes.com

Mrs.PatsFanInVa · 09-25-2010, 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatsFanInMaine

Should be some interesting reading.

How Obama Thinks - Forbes.com

Isn't that Ann Coulter's old boyfriend?

Oughta be a totally unbiased read, no doubt.

***Harry Boy*** · 09-25-2010, 09:26 PM

Obama's Rage
Who gives a *****

***IcyPatriot*** · 09-25-2010, 09:36 PM

How Obama Thinks Page 3 of 5 - Forbes.com

Quote:

It may seem incredible to suggest that the anticolonial ideology of Barack Obama Sr. is espoused by his son, the President of the United States. That is what I am saying. From a very young age and through his formative years, Obama learned to see America as a force for global domination and destruction. He came to view America's military as an instrument of neocolonial occupation.

He adopted his father's position that capitalism and free markets are code words for economic plunder. Obama grew to perceive the rich as an oppressive class, a kind of neocolonial power within America.

In his worldview, profits are a measure of how effectively you have ripped off the rest of society, and America's power in the world is a measure of how selfishly it consumes the globe's resources and how ruthlessly it bullies and dominates the rest of the planet.

For Obama, the solutions are simple. He must work to wring the neocolonialism out of America and the West. And here is where our anticolonial understanding of Obama really takes off, because it provides a vital key to explaining not only his major policy actions but also the little details that no other theory can adequately account for

***IcyPatriot*** · 09-25-2010, 09:39 PM

Quote:

If Obama shares his father's anticolonial crusade, that would explain why he wants people who are already paying close to 50% of their income in overall taxes to pay even more.

The anticolonialist believes that since the rich have prospered at the expense of others, their wealth doesn't really belong to them; therefore whatever can be extracted from them is automatically just.

Recall what Obama Sr. said in his 1965 paper: There is no tax rate too high, and even a 100% rate is justified under certain circumstances.

This book makes the elections much more fun now.

***reflexblue*** · 09-25-2010, 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harry Boy

Obama's Rage
Who gives a *****

Harry's Rage......Who Gives Sh1t

***IcyPatriot*** · 09-25-2010, 09:42 PM

Quote:

But instead of readying us for the challenge, our President is trapped in his father's time machine. Incredibly, the U.S. is being ruled according to the dreams of a Luo tribesman of the 1950s.

This philandering, inebriated African socialist, who raged against the world for denying him the realization of his anticolonial ambitions, is now setting the nation's agenda through the reincarnation of his dreams in his son.

The son makes it happen, but he candidly admits he is only living out his father's dream. The invisible father provides the inspiration, and the son dutifully gets the job done. America today is governed by a ghost.

Sheesh ... I told everyone to support Hillary ... everyone laughed.

Patsfanin Philly · 09-25-2010, 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mrs.PatsFanInVa

Isn't that Ann Coulter's old boyfriend?

Oughta be a totally unbiased read, no doubt.

Nice deflection but do you really want to get into the "you're judged by the company you keep" as it relates to President Obama?

D'Souza isn't the first to make this argument and it explains the issue of the bust of Winston Churchill being returned to the
British embassy rather than being moved to another room in the White House or simply placed in storage. Churchill was the personification of British colonialism and there was no way a bust of this guy was going to be in the Oval Office, let alone anywhere in the WH.

***apple strudel*** · 09-25-2010, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patsfanin Philly

D'Souza isn't the first to make this argument and it explains the issue of the bust of Winston Churchill being returned to the
British embassy rather than being moved to another room in the White House or simply placed in storage. Churchill was the personification of British colonialism and there was no way a bust of this guy was going to be in the Oval Office, let alone anywhere in the WH.

Why not when all Obama has done in his foreign policy is to extend American colonialism? Or do people still think we're in Afghanistan fighting for freedom rather than opening up new markets for American beef exports.

And of course, we all know the real roots of Obama's rage are that he hates white people. Because he's black. And a Communist. I can see the Communism on my street now, and it's all red and full of pictures of farm implements.

***Patters*** · 09-25-2010, 10:49 PM

Conservative writer writes about angry black man. What's interesting about that? It's practically a meme of the right. Problem of course is that Obama does not appear to have any rage. He's pretty laid back by and large.