ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Re: Thoughts on Tolerance for the Ground Zero Mosque
Quote:
Originally Posted by Real World
Can a deficit growing, government bloating administration and congress, be called conservative? I think we're seeing what the general populace thinks about that question, in this election cycle. The answer is no. It's why incumbents, and candidates like Mike Castle, are getting kicked to the curbside.
The answer to your question btw, is no. They didn't. The follow up question is, do you think the liberal congress in power since 2007, and the liberal president in control since 2009, have done a lot to improve America, from where it was when they took over?
Like it or not, the Republicans have been the "conservatives" in the nation.
There is no small-government party, but the Republicans were the ones pretending to be just that.
Obama has done a poor job. He expanded government even beyond what I expected (and I voted for him knowing that he was very liberal), he has been weak on social issues and he has shown poor judgment, rushing to judgment on matters where a calm thoughtful approach may have served him well and being circumspect when quicker action, or at least words, may have been better.
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Thoughts on Tolerance for the Ground Zero Mosque
On the first part: actually, my response to your post didn't condemn you posting those jokes at all. Before I formed a judgment, I wanted to know where you were coming from.
My criticism of your jokes came after your comment to mrs. Those 2 coupled together (plus you later essentially calling her a similar name) were what I took -- and still take -- to be unacceptable on this board.
I think there's a big difference between what is acceptable among a group of friends and what is acceptable among strangers, acquaintances or just out in public. Honestly, I don't know what gets somebody banned here if what you said in multiple posts yesterday is permitted.
Re the 2nd, I'm pretty sure there was a very clear reason I didn't answer your question, which is why I'm asking which thread.
Assuming that was you, you've either forgotten that part or are deliberately omitting it now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupofjoe1962
Then why are you so worried about people telling Muslim radical or non radical jokes.
I do appreciate and respect your honest answer.
I am not going to look back to the exact thread, but a few months ago, there was a post about the Rev Wright.....
I put you on a list of liberals with Patters & Darryls in one of my posts and you did not like that....
You then hit me with a ton of questions and I answered them the
best I could.
Time and time again, I asked you your view on Rev Wright and you
never responded.....
That's it...
Last edited by chicowalker; 09-24-2010 at 10:56 AM..
Re: Thoughts on Tolerance for the Ground Zero Mosque
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicowalker
I'm going to defend my statement because there was nothing wrong with it, and you have now mischaracterized it.
Show me where I defended sharia in any way.
I pointed out that we should be aware of our own current and past laws when we are condemning others. I don't know how you can possibly find fault with that.
But Chico, our LAWS are fine. It is the interpretation of them as well as problems with jury's decisions that are the problem.
I correctly pointed out that Sharia law MAKES IT LEGAL for men to beat their wives. Wives in the USA have every protection they need in our laws, however imperfect they may be.
Please show me the U.S law that allows for spouses to be raped. That comparison you made was ridiculous.
THAT was my point.
So, do you condemn Sharia law? I absolutely do.
Last edited by PatriotsReign; 09-24-2010 at 10:57 AM..
Re: Thoughts on Tolerance for the Ground Zero Mosque
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupofjoe1962
I do not believe you?
Don't give up your day job...... Your sophisticated humor must be as dry as your...... you know what.
Seriously dude? That's classless pal.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Re: Thoughts on Tolerance for the Ground Zero Mosque
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatriotsReign
But Chico, our LAWS are fine. It is the interpretation of them as well as problems with jury's decisions that are the problem.
I correctly pointed out that Sharia law MAKES IT LEGAL for men to beat their wives. Wives in the USA have every protection they need in our laws, however imperfect they may be.
Please show me the U.S law that allows for spouses to be raped.
THAT was my point.
So, do you condemn Sharia law? I absolutely do.
Of course I do, as I've already stated in this thread.
As for US laws, I believe that there are still states that treat spousal rape with more lenience than other rape.
Do you know how recently spousal rape was legal in many states?
Re: Thoughts on Tolerance for the Ground Zero Mosque
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicowalker
Not sure how much of a high horse we can be on, given the US treatment of spousal rape.
Huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatriotsReign
THIS IS IT...RIGHT THERE!!!
You're first reaction is to DEFEND Islam and criticize the US. Why?
Sharia law is an effing JOKE Chico...no, it's actually cruel and sad. But you rationalize it by attempting to compare it to something YOU believe is comparable.
At least we have LAWS and constitutional protections against rape. Sharia law ALLOWS these beatings...it is perfectly LEGAL and OK to beat your wife.
No comparison at all.
But I bet your first reaction will be to defend your statement...just a gut feeling.
Bingo.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Re: Thoughts on Tolerance for the Ground Zero Mosque
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicowalker
Like it or not, the Republicans have been the "conservatives" in the nation.
There is no small-government party, but the Republicans were the ones pretending to be just that.
Obama has done a poor job. He expanded government even beyond what I expected (and I voted for him knowing that he was very liberal), he has been weak on social issues and he has shown poor judgment, rushing to judgment on matters where a calm thoughtful approach may have served him well and being circumspect when quicker action, or at least words, may have been better.
Wrong chico. The dumb down that is US politics has labeled the Republican Party as "conservative", just as it is now labelling the Democratic Party as "liberal". You can't be conservative if you grow gubmit, and blow up budgets. Fortunately, the voting public, by way of the Tea Party movement, is seeing that, and pointing it out, by voting out fonies. Out go fake so-called "conservatives", who have done nothing but expand government. In come people they percieve to be fiscally sane, smaller government, balance the budget types. Just because someone calls themselves a conservative, or the media labels them as one, it doesn't mean that they are. I think Dems will face the same cleansing of their ranks issue, after these next two elections shake up their party.
So I take it the answer to my follow up question, is no, they haven't?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Last edited by Real World; 09-24-2010 at 11:15 AM..
Re: Thoughts on Tolerance for the Ground Zero Mosque
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupofjoe1962
Didn't you hear about the 3 alter boys sitting in a snow bank.
Father Porter liked a couple cold one's after church.
Yes.... I hate the Catholic church too.
I am an equal opportunity offender....
Yanno, call me crazy, but I don't think this one's all that funny, either.
There is one difference, however, in this one you're mocking someone or something specific - you're not saying all Catholics are child molesting maniacs, you're saying priests in specific are child molesting maniacs. It's not generic, it's specific. Your Muslim "jokes" on the other hand, were about ALL Muslim men and ALL Muslim women.
I don't expect you'll see the difference and it doesn't really matter, anyhow. They're all in bad taste and they're all unfair in one way or another.
Re: Thoughts on Tolerance for the Ground Zero Mosque
Quote:
Originally Posted by Real World
Wrong chico. The dumb down that is US politics has labeled the Republican Party as "conservative", just as it is now labelling the Democratic Party as "liberal". You can't be conservative if you grow gubmit, and blow up budgets. Fortunately, the voting public, by way of the Tea Party movement, is seeing that, and pointing it out, by voting out fonies. Out go fake so-called "conservatives", who have done nothing but expand government. In come people they percieve to be fiscally sane, smaller government, balance the budget types. Just because someone calls themselves a conservative, or the media labels them as one, it doesn't mean that they are. I think Dems will face the same cleansing of their ranks issue, after these next two elections shake up their party.
So I take it the answer to my follow up question, is no, they haven't?
This is why I regularly ask the question of what the Republican party is when people speak of RINOs.
If you want to say the Republicans aren't conservatives because they've been for big government, too, I have no quibble with that, as it is their own label, and I agree with your statement of the facts.
It just means there is no conservative party in the US and there hasn't been one in decades.
As for your last question, I thought my answer was clearly no -- im on my phone and can't see what I'm responding to once I start typing, so apologies if that was unclear.
Re: Thoughts on Tolerance for the Ground Zero Mosque
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatriotsReign
Wives in the USA have every protection they need in our laws, however imperfect they may be.
Please show me the U.S law that allows for spouses to be raped. That comparison you made was ridiculous.
You think so, really?
Spousal rape was legal in all 50 states until the late 1970s. It remained legal in some states until the mid-90s. It is still prosecuted (WHEN it's prosecuted) under far different standards than any other type of rape and the punishment, if found guilty, is significantly less.
Until the late 1970's, most states did not consider spousal rape a crime. Typically, spouses were exempted from the sexual assault laws. For example, until 1993 North Carolina law stated that "a person may not be prosecuted under this article if the victim is the person's legal spouse at the time of the commission of the alleged rape or sexual offense unless the parties are living separate and apart."
While spousal rape is now considered a crime, victims often have to overcome additional legal hurdles to prosecution not present for other victims of rape. These include time limits for reporting the offense, a requirement that force or threat of force be used by the offender, and the fact that some sexual assault offenses still preclude spousal victims.
In seven states, rape of a spouse is a separate crime from rape where the victim and offender are unmarried. For example, in West Virginia, spousal sexual assault is defined as unconsented sexual penetration or sexual intrusion of the perpetrator's spouse. In addition, the perpetrator must use forcible compulsion or a deadly weapon or inflict serious bodily injury upon anyone. This offense is a felony, punishable by imprisonment for two to ten years. The same acts against a person who is not married to the perpetrator result in a sentence of ten to thirty-five years. An example of a similar statute comes from California.The offenses of rape and spousal rape mostly parallel each other, but with some differences For instance, a person who commits non-spousal rape by means of force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury may not be sentenced to probation or suspended sentence. However, this prohibition does not apply to those who use the same means to commit spousal rape.
While all states recognize spousal rape as a crime, still, there are ways in which spousal rape is treated differently than non-spousal rape. One difference in some states is a reporting period which is shorter for spousal rape than for other crimes. Another way that some states treat rape of a spouse is treated differently than non-spousal rape is the requirement that force or threat of force must be used by the spouse.
Still, in many states, there are some offenses which are unavailable to victims who are married to the offender. In some, offenses which involve sexual acts other than penetration are precluded for spouses. In Ohio, the offense of "sexual battery" does not apply to a spouse, and the offense of "rape" by the use of a drug or intoxicant which impairs the victim's ability to resist only applies to a spouse who is living separate and apart from the victim.