Study Backs Up Feds' Theory of Why World Trade Center Collapsed on Sept. 11 - Page 2 - New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard
ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
Re: Study Backs Up Feds' Theory of Why World Trade Center Collapsed on Sept. 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuiGon
I never understood the motivation behind the Flight 93 conspiracy theorists... If it was shot down, why would the government deny it...? As horrible as that would be, not one single American would criticize the President for ordering that plane to be downed given that it was under terrorist control and headed straight for the Capitol.
Actually, wait... on second thought there are plenty of rabid Bush haters that would criticize him no matter what he did...
Ain't THAT the truth.
Actually, I could give a fig whether 93 was shot down or not; at least it didn't hit the Capitol or 1600 Penn Ave.
Personally, I see no reason whatsoever for the government to deny it if they *did* shoot down 93. Knowing what they knew, it would have been perfectly acceptable.
The kicker, however, is all the cell phone conversations between loved ones whose family members were on the flight, the ones who called and said they were hijacked and that they were going to try to re-gain control of the plane. I believe they did rush the terrorists but when they did the terrorists simply put the plane into a head-first dive, at which point it was virtually impossible to stop it, especially since the guys counter-punching the al qaeda were not trained pilots and it's damned hard to take control of a plane when you're standing on the ceiling upside down.
//
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Re: Study Backs Up Feds' Theory of Why World Trade Center Collapsed on Sept. 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fogbuster
I only went to the top of the WTC once in my life, around 1993. I remember standing out on the observation deck -- it is NOTHING like the Empire SB, almost nobody there, had the place to ourselves (wife's family from Japan was visiting) -- and as I was looking up the Hudson river, over toward Jersey, I could see two small planes, 4 or 6-seaters, who were flying above the river, about a 3/4 mile apart. Those two planes, probably out of Teeterboro, looked so-o-o-o small, wa-a-a-y down below us. Iow, the Twin Towers were up there in the clouds.
//
I did that flight several times in the 90's. I used to work as a Flight Instructor out of Fitchburg, MA. Round trip with a fuel stop was a bit over 5 hours. It was charted as the Hudson River Scenic on aviation maps back then. Air Traffic Control permitted you to fly over the river below 600' without a clearance IIRC. West side of the river all the way south from the Tapanzee(?) bridge to the Statue of Liberty. You could only circle the Statue counter clockwise for anti-collision reasons. Then back up the East side. You looked up at the little sky scrapers from that height.
Re: Study Backs Up Feds' Theory of Why World Trade Center Collapsed on Sept. 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdaniels7114
I did that flight several times in the 90's. I used to work as a Flight Instructor out of Fitchburg, MA. Round trip with a fuel stop was a bit over 5 hours. It was charted as the Hudson River Scenic on aviation maps back then. Air Traffic Control permitted you to fly over the river below 600' without a clearance IIRC. West side of the river all the way south from the Tapanzee(?) bridge to the Statue of Liberty. You could only circle the Statue counter clockwise for anti-collision reasons. Then back up the East side. You looked up at the little sky scrapers from that height.
Re: Study Backs Up Feds' Theory of Why World Trade Center Collapsed on Sept. 11
No way MAAAAAAAAAN. The government lies have you all FOOOLED. The bigger lie, the easier it is to believe! Question authority! Kill you TV! Open your eyes! <insert bumper sticker slogan of conspiracy theorist who watched too much X-Files in the late 90s and now has a delusions of grandeur that he/she can solve all governments cover-ups, conspiracies, etc.>
Re: Study Backs Up Feds' Theory of Why World Trade Center Collapsed on Sept. 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fogbuster
Those buildings were constructed in an era when full size commercial airliners hitting them was not even considered. Small planes (2 to 20 seats), yes, but big planes, no. Poor design and building on the cheap was the reason they went down so easily.
//
//
Actually, contrary to Quigs' implicit claim that this is a case of "hindsight is 20/20," you need look no further than your local neighborhood NFL murderer running back's videography to see this claim has been made before (In "The Towering Inferno," these exact weaknesses are actually mentioned in the plot. The tower in that film, insofar as it is anything other than a basic action/disaster movie, serves as commentary on "just building them higher and cheaper.)
Of course the fed "theory" -- that people who don't like America ran big freakin planes into buildings -- is correct.
There's no conspiracy here. But the "blank check" the event was taken to signify as been cashed too many times. Naturally, when people play enough games with the truth, they make nutty conspiracy theories look plausible.
PFnV
Last edited by PatsFanInVa; 06-20-2007 at 08:01 PM..
Re: Study Backs Up Feds' Theory of Why World Trade Center Collapsed on Sept. 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuiGon
I never understood the motivation behind the Flight 93 conspiracy theorists... If it was shot down, why would the government deny it...? As horrible as that would be, not one single American would criticize the President for ordering that plane to be downed given that it was under terrorist control and headed straight for the Capitol.
Actually, wait... on second thought there are plenty of rabid Bush haters that would criticize him no matter what he did...
Well, I could see where they would initially deny it was shot down, since that had never been done in our history, and thus the reaction by the public couldn't have been predicted. After the fact, I think we all agree that if they did, or if it happened again, such a course of action would be regrettabley justified. Therefore, if they initially denied it, they are not going to admit it thereafter. Doing so would give people the ability to point at the government and say "so you lied at first? Why? So what else have you lied to us about in the past?"
A possibility anyway.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897