ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
I thought Biden really stood out. He seemed like a President. Edwards all of the sudden is Mr Aggressive. Clinton was solid. Obama was too. the others are just not in the same league.
For that reason, i thought it was a huge night for Biden, he showed he belongs in the race.
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
Richardson, by far, won this debate. He is the most presidential of all those who took the stage, not to mention the other 72 Democrat candidates who couldn't fit into the room.
Dennis Kunichki (sp.) was also darn strong. Everybody needs to look at these guys for their "not already in the pockets of some lobby" quality.
Biden was also terrific. The rest were just reading from Hollywood scripts. You could see their directors talking to them from backstage. Pathetic.
Richardson, by far, won this debate. He is the most presidential of all those who took the stage, not to mention the other 72 Democrat candidates who couldn't fit into the room.
Dennis Kunichki (sp.) was also darn strong. Everybody needs to look at these guys for their "not already in the pockets of some lobby" quality.
Biden was also terrific. The rest were just reading from Hollywood scripts. You could see their directors talking to them from backstage. Pathetic.
//
Richardson? Pah! This clown was asked what his #1 priority and what was his answer? Was it education or health care?? I forget. Either way, it shows how and why Dems continue to lose election after election. This guy is a pathetic little skidmark on the underwear of US electoral politics.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I only saw about an hour of the debate last night as I had a softball game, and like I felt after watching the Repub's, I think we're fukced. That Dodd guy is a maroon. What did he say? 50 mpg CAFE standards? Hillary is clearly the Dem version of Romney. She's tall, has a strong arm....Edward's is a total fraud. To hear him talk abotu healthcare was comical. Richardson was trying hard, and he's got a pretty good record, but he didn't do himself much last night. Biden has always been strong, but that strength is also his downfall. He sometimes doesn't know when to (Please be quiet - edited). Obama is clearly the best candidate on the Dem side. His only problem is his inexperience. He didn't do too well in answering the question about the VA.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
On Meet the Press yesterday they were all speculating on a Gore/Obama ticket and how that is the talk in all the inner circles, that Gore will wait for the public to get dissatisfied with the choices in the fall and then jump in.
Gore makes up for Obamas inexperience and Obama livens up the ticket.
for Clinton, Obama, or Edwards, either Biden or Richardson would make perfect sense as the VP.
I didn't see the debate, but I did read that Biden did very well. The problem for him is that he's kind of past his prime, has a lot of baggage, and has a tendency to put his foot in his mouth. Too bad Richardson didn't do well. He seems like a pretty decent guy. The pundits seem to think that Hillary didn't hurt herself, Obama did a better job in the last debate by being specific, and Edwards went on the offensive. I'd be reasonably happy with any of the three frontrunner, though Hillary is my last choice. Hillary seems convinced that if she changes her tune on Iraq, it will set the stage for later attacks that a woman isn't strong enough or consistent enough to be president. Women politicians do face an uphill battle; that said, I'm not sure if Hillary's version of the Iron Lady (Margaret Thatcher) will fly here.
keep in mind, Gore got more popular votes than Bush, and now Bush is at all time lows and Gore is more popular than he was before. Add Obama to that......
On Meet the Press yesterday they were all speculating on a Gore/Obama ticket and how that is the talk in all the inner circles, that Gore will wait for the public to get dissatisfied with the choices in the fall and then jump in.
Gore makes up for Obamas inexperience and Obama livens up the ticket.
for Clinton, Obama, or Edwards, either Biden or Richardson would make perfect sense as the VP.
Obama would be doing himself a disservice. People will run away from Al Gore. People want something new, not the same old names. I could see the Dems doing that, since they seem to think two names makes a ticket better than one. That would be a mistake ticket like Edwards/Kerry was.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
I didn't see the debate, but I did read that Biden did very well. The problem for him is that he's kind of past his prime, has a lot of baggage, and has a tendency to put his foot in his mouth. Too bad Richardson didn't do well. He seems like a pretty decent guy. The pundits seem to think that Hillary didn't hurt herself, Obama did a better job in the last debate by being specific, and Edwards went on the offensive. I'd be reasonably happy with any of the three frontrunner, though Hillary is my last choice. Hillary seems convinced that if she changes her tune on Iraq, it will set the stage for later attacks that a woman isn't strong enough or consistent enough to be president. Women politicians do face an uphill battle; that said, I'm not sure if Hillary's version of the Iron Lady (Margaret Thatcher) will fly here.
Obama was stellar on CNN tonight. I didn't see Hillary portion, but Obama was very good.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897