ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
See, this is the sort of thing that homosexuals don't like to talk about. Because for all of their "we just want to be left alone to live in peace" bull*****, fact is that what they want is to impose their lifestyle on all the rest of us, shove it down our throats (figuratively speaking) and force all the rest of us to accept their "lifestyle" on an equal footing on the rest of society.
If I want to run a service (or a parade or a hotel or whatever) and say "ya know, this is for straight people only" then what right does anyone have forcing me to change that..?
LOS ANGELES --A Northern California woman sued the online dating service eHarmony on Thursday, alleging it discriminates against gays, lesbians and bisexuals.
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
You can't treat any American as a second-class citizen. At the same time, if you aren't qualified to offer a service, like matching gays, because you don't understand enough about them, then you should be entitled to deny them what would otherwise be a crappy service anyway. My guess is that this case will turn on whether E-harmony is entitled to remain ignorant of gays. After all, I'm sure the president of this company doesn't know the first thing about the computer algorithm that his company uses to match straight people. He hires people to understand it for him. Why has he chosen to not hire people who could create one for gays?
It's an absurd case. There are all sorts of restrictive groups: Christian singles, Jewish singles, gay dating services, not to mention porn. The case is almost as ignorant as anyone who believes one woman's activities in Northern California represent the gay agenda.
Lol, one person's lawsuit constitutes an agenda for an entire class of people? Like Patters said, it's a stupid suit and it should get tossed. When that woman sued McDonalds because she spilled her coffee, did we call it the feminine agenda?
I it find laughable to think of nation's gay people getting together at a secret meeting to discuss how they're going to push their agenda to make us all gay.
You can't treat any American as a second-class citizen. At the same time, if you aren't qualified to offer a service, like matching gays, because you don't understand enough about them, then you should be entitled to deny them what would otherwise be a crappy service anyway. My guess is that this case will turn on whether E-harmony is entitled to remain ignorant of gays. After all, I'm sure the president of this company doesn't know the first thing about the computer algorithm that his company uses to match straight people. He hires people to understand it for him. Why has he chosen to not hire people who could create one for gays?
Why does he have to? It's a service site. If they don't fit your needs, go somewhere else.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Lol, one person's lawsuit constitutes an agenda for an entire class of people? Like Patters said, it's a stupid suit and it should get tossed. When that woman sued McDonalds because she spilled her coffee, did we call it the feminine agenda?
I it find laughable to think of nation's gay people getting together at a secret meeting to discuss how they're going to push their agenda to make us all gay.
Nope, it fits the John Edwards Agenda.
BTW, that netted her something like $3 million from the jury. Although I do believe that total was later reduced.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him." Leo Tolstoy, 1897
Yes, yes it does. But, even then, she wasn't part of any agenda. She just wanted to get paid, there was no overriding agenda behind it. Likewise with this case. It's one person peeved with what they perceive is discrimination, there were no late-night backroom discussions about how to further the "gay agenda".
It's an absurd case. There are all sorts of restrictive groups: Christian singles, Jewish singles, gay dating services, not to mention porn. The case is almost as ignorant as anyone who believes one woman's activities in Northern California represent the gay agenda.
Oh there's a surprise... ad hominem attacks from Patters the Moderator... never seen that before
A Little More From The Gay Agenda
Linear Mode
